<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Strange MTU behavior PPPOE in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Strange-MTU-behavior-PPPOE/m-p/74109#M5701</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;fixed!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The trial license allowed me to update to 80.30 and it's working now..&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 12:32:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RZomerman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-04T12:32:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Strange MTU behavior PPPOE</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Strange-MTU-behavior-PPPOE/m-p/73996#M5690</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a PPPOE connection to my telco which gives me an MTU of 1492.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However the device seems to be unable to process a packet &amp;gt;1472 bytes that I send out to the internet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My setup is rather simple, ISPmodem-&amp;gt;eth1-CP4400-&amp;gt;Mngt-client&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;when the client is pinging to a public IP address, it all goes fine, as long as the packet size is smaller than 1473.&amp;nbsp;I can send up to 1472, but as soon as I go over it packets are dropped. Which causes weird behaviors obviously.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm on R80.20 Build: 101&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any idea as to why packets &amp;gt;1472 are dropped? Is there a way to find out what is happening?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I had Junipers/USG's connected to the same link and those all work fine..&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't have a support contract as this is my demo device to run some tests on at home..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 09:06:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Strange-MTU-behavior-PPPOE/m-p/73996#M5690</guid>
      <dc:creator>RZomerman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-03T09:06:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Strange MTU behavior PPPOE</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Strange-MTU-behavior-PPPOE/m-p/74109#M5701</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;fixed!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The trial license allowed me to update to 80.30 and it's working now..&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 12:32:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Strange-MTU-behavior-PPPOE/m-p/74109#M5701</guid>
      <dc:creator>RZomerman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-04T12:32:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Strange MTU behavior PPPOE</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Strange-MTU-behavior-PPPOE/m-p/74127#M5702</link>
      <description>With the do not fragment bit set and an IP header of 20 bytes this would be expected behavior.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 15:37:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Strange-MTU-behavior-PPPOE/m-p/74127#M5702</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maarten_Sjouw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-04T15:37:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Strange MTU behavior PPPOE</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Strange-MTU-behavior-PPPOE/m-p/74557#M5736</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It is possible that the ICMP packet somehow got tangled up with SecureXL under R80.20 since SecureXL does not support Point-To-Point links, but ICMP is never supposed to be accelerated by SecureXL at all so that seems consistent with some kind of bug that was fixed.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2020 16:03:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Strange-MTU-behavior-PPPOE/m-p/74557#M5736</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-09T16:03:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

