<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SandBlast Errors in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SandBlast-Errors/m-p/143854#M55652</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We have encountered a problem with SandBlast TE250 equipment.&lt;BR /&gt;We have cases where letters from the MTA go to Bypass without waiting for a response from SandBlast. When such cases occur, we see the following errors in the ted.elg directory.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[TE (TD::Surprise)] te::Emulation::EmulationInvestigator::HandleFileEmulationFailed: {CA........} Failed to emulate file on image 'e........' (file status: VM assigned): Internal virtual sandbox communication error&lt;BR /&gt;[TE_TRACE]: {................} Run 3 for image: 'e50....' ended with verdict 'Error' (0 malicious runs, min:2), reason: Internal virtual sandbox communication error&lt;BR /&gt;[TE_TRACE]: {................} verdict 'Error' set for image: 'e50e...' (WinXP,Office 2003/7,Adobe 9) by: 1, reason: Internal virtual sandbox communication error&lt;BR /&gt;[TE_TRACE]: VM 272 KeyPoint: Terminating VM due to error: Failed to connect to SYMO client&lt;BR /&gt;[TE (TD::Surprise)] te::Emulation::EmulatingVM::TerminateWithError: VM 272 (Creation In Process): Terminating VM due to error: Failed to connect to SYMO client&lt;BR /&gt;[TE_TRACE]: VM 272 KeyPoint: Terminating (error occured? 1, detected events: 0 malicious, 0 benign)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We found similar sk120479 and sk135392, they don't fully correspond to our problem, but they are similar.&lt;BR /&gt;Both SKs say about TAS. Unfortunately our existing cases in TAS are going very long, so I would like to know if anyone has any experience with similar errors and how you can diagnose these errors?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 07:45:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Hllrdm</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-03-16T07:45:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SandBlast Errors</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SandBlast-Errors/m-p/143854#M55652</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have encountered a problem with SandBlast TE250 equipment.&lt;BR /&gt;We have cases where letters from the MTA go to Bypass without waiting for a response from SandBlast. When such cases occur, we see the following errors in the ted.elg directory.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[TE (TD::Surprise)] te::Emulation::EmulationInvestigator::HandleFileEmulationFailed: {CA........} Failed to emulate file on image 'e........' (file status: VM assigned): Internal virtual sandbox communication error&lt;BR /&gt;[TE_TRACE]: {................} Run 3 for image: 'e50....' ended with verdict 'Error' (0 malicious runs, min:2), reason: Internal virtual sandbox communication error&lt;BR /&gt;[TE_TRACE]: {................} verdict 'Error' set for image: 'e50e...' (WinXP,Office 2003/7,Adobe 9) by: 1, reason: Internal virtual sandbox communication error&lt;BR /&gt;[TE_TRACE]: VM 272 KeyPoint: Terminating VM due to error: Failed to connect to SYMO client&lt;BR /&gt;[TE (TD::Surprise)] te::Emulation::EmulatingVM::TerminateWithError: VM 272 (Creation In Process): Terminating VM due to error: Failed to connect to SYMO client&lt;BR /&gt;[TE_TRACE]: VM 272 KeyPoint: Terminating (error occured? 1, detected events: 0 malicious, 0 benign)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We found similar sk120479 and sk135392, they don't fully correspond to our problem, but they are similar.&lt;BR /&gt;Both SKs say about TAS. Unfortunately our existing cases in TAS are going very long, so I would like to know if anyone has any experience with similar errors and how you can diagnose these errors?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 07:45:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SandBlast-Errors/m-p/143854#M55652</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hllrdm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-16T07:45:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SandBlast Errors</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SandBlast-Errors/m-p/143856#M55653</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;TE250 is from &lt;SPAN&gt;Sep-2013 and&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;out of any support since&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Jun-2020 !&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 08:33:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SandBlast-Errors/m-p/143856#M55653</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-16T08:33:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SandBlast Errors</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SandBlast-Errors/m-p/143858#M55654</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We did further analysis, similar problems also exist on other equipment that is fresher than 250.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 08:39:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SandBlast-Errors/m-p/143858#M55654</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hllrdm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-16T08:39:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SandBlast Errors</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SandBlast-Errors/m-p/143861#M55655</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="cp_link sc_ellipsis" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk114806&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=Threat" target="_blank"&gt;sk114806: ATRG: Threat Emulation &lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;gives treoubleshooting help.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You should ask TAC to resolve the issue &lt;SPAN&gt;on other equipment that is still supported&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;- not on the TE250 soon out of support for 2 years already...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 08:47:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SandBlast-Errors/m-p/143861#M55655</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-16T08:47:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SandBlast Errors</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SandBlast-Errors/m-p/143863#M55656</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As I wrote earlier, while we do not see the point in contacting the TAC, as cases are delayed for a long time. I wrote this thread to find out if anyone had such a problem at SandBlast and how to solve it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 09:01:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SandBlast-Errors/m-p/143863#M55656</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hllrdm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-16T09:01:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SandBlast Errors</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SandBlast-Errors/m-p/143883#M55657</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am afraid, sometimes you do have to let TAC help you. There is always an option to escalate, if you believe you are not getting enough attention.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you need any assistance, please feel free to PM me.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:38:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SandBlast-Errors/m-p/143883#M55657</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-16T10:38:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

