<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: R80.20 Cluster Load sharing issue in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-Cluster-Load-sharing-issue/m-p/72608#M5531</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I would not use LS mode. It doesn't really give you an advantage. From years of experience I recommend HA mode to many of our customers.&amp;nbsp;There you can discuss many advantages and disadvantages.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would open a TAC case here.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Tip&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here you will find an interesting collection of commands to debug this issue:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-wiki-small" href="https://community.checkpoint.com/docs/DOC-3741-r8030-cheat-sheet-clusterxl" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-containerid="2057" data-containertype="14" data-objectid="3475" data-objecttype="102"&gt;R80.x - cheat sheet - ClusterXL&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2020 16:41:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-01-18T16:41:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>R80.20 Cluster Load sharing issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-Cluster-Load-sharing-issue/m-p/72599#M5530</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear CheckMates,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I ran into below issue for customer using Loadsharing mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Mgmt Server in R80.20 Smart appliance with latest JHF_Take_118&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(followed &lt;SPAN&gt;sk162637&lt;/SPAN&gt;) - (No IPSec blade enabled)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) FW Clusters in R80.20 with JHF_Take_118 as well (5800 appliances)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;a)When we use Cluster Load sharing - Multicast - All working fine&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;b)When we use Cluster Load sharing - Unicast (without VMAC) - All working fine&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;c)When we use Cluster Load sharing - Unicast (with VMAC) - Complete halt of traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even Pivot member unable to reach default gateway IP and their production halted. (So reverted to HA mode)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The above scenario I had tested in my lab environment and faced exactly same issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Loadsharing Unicast (without VMAC) &amp;amp; Multicast works fine post JHF_Take_118 on both Mgmt server &amp;amp; FWs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But when LS-with VMAC option = stops working.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any one had faced such scenario?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(I haven't tried the above LS in R80.30 for now - will check that as well)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards, Prabulingam.N&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2020 12:09:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-Cluster-Load-sharing-issue/m-p/72599#M5530</guid>
      <dc:creator>Prabulingam_N1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-18T12:09:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.20 Cluster Load sharing issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-Cluster-Load-sharing-issue/m-p/72608#M5531</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would not use LS mode. It doesn't really give you an advantage. From years of experience I recommend HA mode to many of our customers.&amp;nbsp;There you can discuss many advantages and disadvantages.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would open a TAC case here.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Tip&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here you will find an interesting collection of commands to debug this issue:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-wiki-small" href="https://community.checkpoint.com/docs/DOC-3741-r8030-cheat-sheet-clusterxl" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-containerid="2057" data-containertype="14" data-objectid="3475" data-objecttype="102"&gt;R80.x - cheat sheet - ClusterXL&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2020 16:41:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-Cluster-Load-sharing-issue/m-p/72608#M5531</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-18T16:41:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.20 Cluster Load sharing issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-Cluster-Load-sharing-issue/m-p/72613#M5532</link>
      <description>Best to engage with the TAC on this.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2020 19:06:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-Cluster-Load-sharing-issue/m-p/72613#M5532</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-18T19:06:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.20 Cluster Load sharing issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-Cluster-Load-sharing-issue/m-p/72667#M5547</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Heiko/Phoneboy,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Opening TAC case not a problem at all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have suggested customer to use LS-Multicast or LS-Unicast without VMAC as per my lab result.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But prior to that I'm thinking if this could any chance be "Limitation on LS mode usage with VMAC"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not sure if any of CheckMates have faced or tried in their setup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards, Prabulingam.N&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 05:02:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-Cluster-Load-sharing-issue/m-p/72667#M5547</guid>
      <dc:creator>Prabulingam_N1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-20T05:02:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

