<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: You should use active/active mode only if your single gateway is not able to handle traffic/ CPU in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/You-should-use-active-active-mode-only-if-your-single-gateway-is/m-p/69660#M5352</link>
    <description>If you have a traditional Active/Active ClusterXL cluster and one member fails, then the other cluster member will have to shoulder the load of both members.&lt;BR /&gt;If both members are above 50% capacity and one fails, now your remaining member will be overloaded and that may cause additional issues.&lt;BR /&gt;As long as you understand/accept that tradeoff, it's fine.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you need more capacity and don't want to sacrifice resiliency, your choices are to buy larger appliances or use Maestro.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 02:31:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-12-09T02:31:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>You should use active/active mode only if your single gateway is not able to handle traffic/ CPU/ Me</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/You-should-use-active-active-mode-only-if-your-single-gateway-is/m-p/69632#M5351</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You should use active/active mode only if your single gateway is not able to handle traffic/ CPU/ Memory-&lt;STRONG&gt;Why&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Dec 2019 12:17:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/You-should-use-active-active-mode-only-if-your-single-gateway-is/m-p/69632#M5351</guid>
      <dc:creator>Asherh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-08T12:17:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: You should use active/active mode only if your single gateway is not able to handle traffic/ CPU</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/You-should-use-active-active-mode-only-if-your-single-gateway-is/m-p/69660#M5352</link>
      <description>If you have a traditional Active/Active ClusterXL cluster and one member fails, then the other cluster member will have to shoulder the load of both members.&lt;BR /&gt;If both members are above 50% capacity and one fails, now your remaining member will be overloaded and that may cause additional issues.&lt;BR /&gt;As long as you understand/accept that tradeoff, it's fine.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you need more capacity and don't want to sacrifice resiliency, your choices are to buy larger appliances or use Maestro.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 02:31:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/You-should-use-active-active-mode-only-if-your-single-gateway-is/m-p/69660#M5352</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-09T02:31:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: You should use active/active mode only if your single gateway is not able to handle traffic/ CPU</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/You-should-use-active-active-mode-only-if-your-single-gateway-is/m-p/69679#M5353</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok,Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is another&amp;nbsp;reasons not use&amp;nbsp;active/active mode?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Asher&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 08:05:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/You-should-use-active-active-mode-only-if-your-single-gateway-is/m-p/69679#M5353</guid>
      <dc:creator>Asherh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-09T08:05:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: You should use active/active mode only if your single gateway is not able to handle traffic/ CPU</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/You-should-use-active-active-mode-only-if-your-single-gateway-is/m-p/69680#M5354</link>
      <description>Other reasons</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 08:06:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/You-should-use-active-active-mode-only-if-your-single-gateway-is/m-p/69680#M5354</guid>
      <dc:creator>Asherh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-09T08:06:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: You should use active/active mode only if your single gateway is not able to handle traffic/ CPU</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/You-should-use-active-active-mode-only-if-your-single-gateway-is/m-p/69791#M5370</link>
      <description>If you need support for Load Sharing VPN in R80.20+, it's not supported.&lt;BR /&gt;See: &lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/When-will-checkpoint-support-the-Load-Sharing-mode-in-either-R80/m-p/58571/thread-id/11805#M11854" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/When-will-checkpoint-support-the-Load-Sharing-mode-in-either-R80/m-p/58571/thread-id/11805#M11854&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also, there's some feature limitations with Load Sharing.&lt;BR /&gt;See: &lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk101539" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk101539&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 16:40:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/You-should-use-active-active-mode-only-if-your-single-gateway-is/m-p/69791#M5370</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-09T16:40:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

