<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PBR Question in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/PBR-Question/m-p/69181#M5348</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a Checkpoint Cluster named FW1 with a lot of interface and networks attached to it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now we are adding a new Checkpoint Cluster named FW@ for filtering web access. We plan to use pbr on FW1 to override the default route for some vlan like vlan1 and vlan 5 and to redirect the flow to our core network then to FW@.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In theory this can work but ... For communications between vlan1 and vlan2 or vlan1 and vlan3 we need to add a lot of route in the pbr table for each network ....&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to be more simple like saying ... from vlan1 to rfc1918 use static route table, and from vlan1 to other networks use pbr routing table ? Like a cisco device would do ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Olivier&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="PBR .jpg" style="width: 406px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/3482iE080587001339A6E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="PBR .jpg" alt="PBR .jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 15:19:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>oriehl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-12-03T15:19:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PBR Question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/PBR-Question/m-p/69181#M5348</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a Checkpoint Cluster named FW1 with a lot of interface and networks attached to it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now we are adding a new Checkpoint Cluster named FW@ for filtering web access. We plan to use pbr on FW1 to override the default route for some vlan like vlan1 and vlan 5 and to redirect the flow to our core network then to FW@.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In theory this can work but ... For communications between vlan1 and vlan2 or vlan1 and vlan3 we need to add a lot of route in the pbr table for each network ....&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to be more simple like saying ... from vlan1 to rfc1918 use static route table, and from vlan1 to other networks use pbr routing table ? Like a cisco device would do ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Olivier&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="PBR .jpg" style="width: 406px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/3482iE080587001339A6E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="PBR .jpg" alt="PBR .jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 15:19:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/PBR-Question/m-p/69181#M5348</guid>
      <dc:creator>oriehl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-03T15:19:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

