<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: OSPF P2P - R82.10 in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/OSPF-P2P-R82-10/m-p/264134#M51874</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'll have to see about setting something up to get that for you. The firewall this was performed on has been in production for months now using broadcast. I still have a 3920 I have not deployed yet though.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 13:42:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CaseyB</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-12-02T13:42:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>OSPF P2P - R82.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/OSPF-P2P-R82-10/m-p/253691#M49694</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Configuring OSPF this morning on&amp;nbsp;R82.10 Build 271.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It appears that when using P2P mode, OSPF learned routes still show-up as hidden / inactive. Per&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk116500" target="_self"&gt;sk116500&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;OSPF Point-to-Point on Ethernet configuration/functionality is available on all appliances in R81.10 and above versions.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;While the functionality is there, it appears you still need to go the extra step and create a route-map to get this to work. Is there any plan to remove this extra step or did I configure something wrong?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I switched it from P2P to broadcast and everything worked as I originally thought without extra steps.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 16:23:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/OSPF-P2P-R82-10/m-p/253691#M49694</guid>
      <dc:creator>CaseyB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-22T16:23:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OSPF P2P - R82.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/OSPF-P2P-R82-10/m-p/264013#M51865</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Casey,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can you share the OSPF P2P configuration from each GW? On the GW with the inactive/hidden routes, please share the output of "show ospf database" and "show route all".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cortnie&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 21:31:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/OSPF-P2P-R82-10/m-p/264013#M51865</guid>
      <dc:creator>cortnieg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-01T21:31:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OSPF P2P - R82.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/OSPF-P2P-R82-10/m-p/264073#M51866</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Additionally, if you happen to have a TAC case open for this please share the SR so that we can follow-up internally.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 04:23:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/OSPF-P2P-R82-10/m-p/264073#M51866</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-02T04:23:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OSPF P2P - R82.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/OSPF-P2P-R82-10/m-p/264134#M51874</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'll have to see about setting something up to get that for you. The firewall this was performed on has been in production for months now using broadcast. I still have a 3920 I have not deployed yet though.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 13:42:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/OSPF-P2P-R82-10/m-p/264134#M51874</guid>
      <dc:creator>CaseyB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-02T13:42:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OSPF P2P - R82.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/OSPF-P2P-R82-10/m-p/273577#M104142</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3630"&gt;@Chris_Atkinson&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/136895"&gt;@cortnieg&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;we have a SR&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;6-0004456069, our customer uses P2P with /31 mask due to RFC 3021, but OSPF routes hidden and we can't fix it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;One recommendation that we received from RnD and TAC is "change your configuration from /31 to /30 or other, because both routers must be in same network".&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;But the RFC says that /31 can be used.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is there a more detailed explanation of the reasoning behind this or any specific recommendations?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Or does Check Point not support this standard?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 09:45:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/OSPF-P2P-R82-10/m-p/273577#M104142</guid>
      <dc:creator>gkhokhlov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-17T09:45:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OSPF P2P - R82.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/OSPF-P2P-R82-10/m-p/273578#M104143</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;To be clear /31 usage and P2P networks are related but not the same requirement.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Suspect you will need to submit an RFE but you will need a workaround in the interim.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 09:59:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/OSPF-P2P-R82-10/m-p/273578#M104143</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-17T09:59:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OSPF P2P - R82.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/OSPF-P2P-R82-10/m-p/273579#M104144</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 10:14:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/OSPF-P2P-R82-10/m-p/273579#M104144</guid>
      <dc:creator>gkhokhlov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-17T10:14:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

