<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Sync interface migration in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sync-interface-migration/m-p/67186#M5155</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have to migrate a sync link from its current interface "eth3" to the interface "eth2".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a best practice to avoid some side-effects like an Active/Active situation ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks to your expertise !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Trif&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:54:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Exploitation_RE</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-11-12T13:54:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Sync interface migration</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sync-interface-migration/m-p/67186#M5155</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have to migrate a sync link from its current interface "eth3" to the interface "eth2".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a best practice to avoid some side-effects like an Active/Active situation ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks to your expertise !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Trif&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:54:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sync-interface-migration/m-p/67186#M5155</guid>
      <dc:creator>Exploitation_RE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-12T13:54:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sync interface migration</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sync-interface-migration/m-p/67467#M5156</link>
      <description>The most obvious thing I can think of is to do this during an outage window with low traffic volumes.&lt;BR /&gt;The gateways use CCP packets on all interfaces to determine reachability, so it shouldn't cause a failover.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 19:30:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sync-interface-migration/m-p/67467#M5156</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-14T19:30:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

