<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic &amp;quot;Multiple obects have the same IP address&amp;quot; with no duplicate objects in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/quot-Multiple-obects-have-the-same-IP-address-quot-with-no/m-p/262273#M51454</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I've got an issue with a gateway cluster.&amp;nbsp; This started when I replaced one of my older appliances with a new one.&amp;nbsp; I installed the new appliance and attempted to establish SIC, however it failed.&amp;nbsp; I realized that the cluster member's IP address (in Cluster Member Properties) was set to an internal address.&amp;nbsp; We used to have an on-prem management server, but now use Smart-1 Cloud, so it makes sense that SIC would fail if it's attempting to use the internal address.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I changed the IP address on the member to it's public address, but now I keep getting the&amp;nbsp;"Multiple obects have the same IP address" message on this public address whenever I make a change to the cluster.&amp;nbsp; Ignoring that message, I am able to establish SIC.&amp;nbsp; But when I try to install policy, it "fails" after 10 minutes with SmartConsole reporting, "&lt;SPAN&gt;Installation failed. Reason: Due to a timeout value of 600000 (millisecond)."&amp;nbsp; It doesn't actually fail to install - if I run "fw stat" in the CLI, it shows the correct policy installed.&amp;nbsp; I should also mention that it only "fails" on the new member - it's fine on the existing member.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;After the timeout message, SIC is broken again.&amp;nbsp; I have to run "fw unloadlocal" in the CLI to re-establish SIC.&amp;nbsp; Another side effect is that if I try to "Get Inerfaces," it fails with the message, "RunCommandInNgm('CreateNgmInterfacesCommand') failed."&amp;nbsp; I followed &lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk154292" target="_self"&gt;sk154292&lt;/A&gt;, deleting all the interfaces and then am able to get interfaces, however I still have the same issue with the "multiple objects" message and the policy install timeout.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;One thing to note after getting interfaces is that the maas_tunnel interface is populated and the existing member has an IP address defined, but the new one does not - it just says "none."&amp;nbsp; I checked my other clusters and none of them have the maas_tunnel listed as an interface.&amp;nbsp; In any case, whether I leave that interface or delete it, the problems still exist.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I opened a case on this, however they want to do a remote troubleshooting session in a few days.&amp;nbsp; In an effort to get my HA back before I'm able to connect with support, I removed the new appliance and put my old one back in.&amp;nbsp; However, the same issues still exist.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It feels like the issue is because of the multiple objects issue, but I've searched and there are no objects with that IP address with the exception of the gateway's interface.&amp;nbsp; If I change the address on the original (working) member, I get the multiple objects message on that IP address as well.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As I said, I have a case open on this, but since it seems it will be a few days before I can make any progress there, I thought I'd reach out here.&amp;nbsp; Thanks.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2025 21:29:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jamie_Kelahan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-11-09T21:29:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>"Multiple obects have the same IP address" with no duplicate objects</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/quot-Multiple-obects-have-the-same-IP-address-quot-with-no/m-p/262273#M51454</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've got an issue with a gateway cluster.&amp;nbsp; This started when I replaced one of my older appliances with a new one.&amp;nbsp; I installed the new appliance and attempted to establish SIC, however it failed.&amp;nbsp; I realized that the cluster member's IP address (in Cluster Member Properties) was set to an internal address.&amp;nbsp; We used to have an on-prem management server, but now use Smart-1 Cloud, so it makes sense that SIC would fail if it's attempting to use the internal address.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I changed the IP address on the member to it's public address, but now I keep getting the&amp;nbsp;"Multiple obects have the same IP address" message on this public address whenever I make a change to the cluster.&amp;nbsp; Ignoring that message, I am able to establish SIC.&amp;nbsp; But when I try to install policy, it "fails" after 10 minutes with SmartConsole reporting, "&lt;SPAN&gt;Installation failed. Reason: Due to a timeout value of 600000 (millisecond)."&amp;nbsp; It doesn't actually fail to install - if I run "fw stat" in the CLI, it shows the correct policy installed.&amp;nbsp; I should also mention that it only "fails" on the new member - it's fine on the existing member.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;After the timeout message, SIC is broken again.&amp;nbsp; I have to run "fw unloadlocal" in the CLI to re-establish SIC.&amp;nbsp; Another side effect is that if I try to "Get Inerfaces," it fails with the message, "RunCommandInNgm('CreateNgmInterfacesCommand') failed."&amp;nbsp; I followed &lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk154292" target="_self"&gt;sk154292&lt;/A&gt;, deleting all the interfaces and then am able to get interfaces, however I still have the same issue with the "multiple objects" message and the policy install timeout.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;One thing to note after getting interfaces is that the maas_tunnel interface is populated and the existing member has an IP address defined, but the new one does not - it just says "none."&amp;nbsp; I checked my other clusters and none of them have the maas_tunnel listed as an interface.&amp;nbsp; In any case, whether I leave that interface or delete it, the problems still exist.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I opened a case on this, however they want to do a remote troubleshooting session in a few days.&amp;nbsp; In an effort to get my HA back before I'm able to connect with support, I removed the new appliance and put my old one back in.&amp;nbsp; However, the same issues still exist.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It feels like the issue is because of the multiple objects issue, but I've searched and there are no objects with that IP address with the exception of the gateway's interface.&amp;nbsp; If I change the address on the original (working) member, I get the multiple objects message on that IP address as well.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As I said, I have a case open on this, but since it seems it will be a few days before I can make any progress there, I thought I'd reach out here.&amp;nbsp; Thanks.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2025 21:29:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/quot-Multiple-obects-have-the-same-IP-address-quot-with-no/m-p/262273#M51454</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jamie_Kelahan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-09T21:29:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: "Multiple obects have the same IP address" with no duplicate objects</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/quot-Multiple-obects-have-the-same-IP-address-quot-with-no/m-p/262284#M51460</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/9577"&gt;@Jamie_Kelahan&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; please try searching again the duplicate object. Search in the object explorer or search via GUIdbedit for the duplicated object or use this older script to find the problematic object&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/API-CLI-Discussion/Find-host-objects-that-share-the-same-IP-address-Duplicate/m-p/39075#M2422" target="_blank"&gt;Find host objects that share the same IP-address /... - Check Point CheckMates&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 07:24:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/quot-Multiple-obects-have-the-same-IP-address-quot-with-no/m-p/262284#M51460</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-10T07:24:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: "Multiple obects have the same IP address" with no duplicate objects</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/quot-Multiple-obects-have-the-same-IP-address-quot-with-no/m-p/262525#M51528</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Wolfgang.&amp;nbsp; It turns out that I actually did have a duplicate object, created by a colleague.&amp;nbsp; The way it was named made me believe it was the default "eth" name from the gateway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The duplicate object didn't have any effect on my failing policy installation nor connectivity to the cloud.&amp;nbsp; That was more my own doing with taking the wrong steps to replace my old appliances.&amp;nbsp; Got it all straightened out with support.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 16:06:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/quot-Multiple-obects-have-the-same-IP-address-quot-with-no/m-p/262525#M51528</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jamie_Kelahan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-11T16:06:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: "Multiple obects have the same IP address" with no duplicate objects</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/quot-Multiple-obects-have-the-same-IP-address-quot-with-no/m-p/262536#M51530</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey Jamie,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Just for the reference, if you ever have this problem again and cant find those objects in smart console, I always recommend guidbedit. Glad you got it sorted out.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 17:05:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/quot-Multiple-obects-have-the-same-IP-address-quot-with-no/m-p/262536#M51530</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-11T17:05:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

