<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Quantum 3920 feedback in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Quantum-3920-feedback/m-p/260035#M51005</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Got it! Sounds like something with that specific appliance then.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 07:52:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-10-16T07:52:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Quantum 3920 feedback</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Quantum-3920-feedback/m-p/256154#M50170</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We recently installed a cluster of Quantum 3920 with dual 10G connectivity.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;They are really fast devices, the boot time is impressive and they integrate perfectly in the R82 SMS along with the relevant hotfix and Smart Console version.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We only have an issue on one of the systems where it's impossible to go in Expert mode, regardless of the authentication method (shared or per user).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In SSH, it gives:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;/bin/clish: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/cli/lib/libcli_cmd.so: undefined symbol: pam_start&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;while in serial console, it just displays "\b".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In both cases, the connection is closed afterwards.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Not much documentation yet for R82.10 and we're just getting started with the cluster, we'll check for features and commands in the coming weeks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 16:00:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Quantum-3920-feedback/m-p/256154#M50170</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex-</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-28T16:00:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Quantum 3920 feedback</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Quantum-3920-feedback/m-p/256161#M50173</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I suspect this is a bug and probably should be reported to TAC.&lt;BR /&gt;Similar to:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk118800" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk118800&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 19:37:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Quantum-3920-feedback/m-p/256161#M50173</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-28T19:37:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Quantum 3920 feedback</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Quantum-3920-feedback/m-p/260030#M51002</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;According to TAC this is a known issue, currently at R&amp;amp;D.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 07:27:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Quantum-3920-feedback/m-p/260030#M51002</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex-</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-16T07:27:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Quantum 3920 feedback</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Quantum-3920-feedback/m-p/260032#M51003</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I worked with customer who bought few of those, had not heard about such an issue. What jumbo?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 07:42:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Quantum-3920-feedback/m-p/260032#M51003</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-16T07:42:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Quantum 3920 feedback</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Quantum-3920-feedback/m-p/260033#M51004</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It doesn't seem to affect all appliances as we have another one where Expert works fine.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Take 22, but was already there on base R82.10.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 07:44:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Quantum-3920-feedback/m-p/260033#M51004</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex-</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-16T07:44:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Quantum 3920 feedback</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Quantum-3920-feedback/m-p/260035#M51005</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Got it! Sounds like something with that specific appliance then.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 07:52:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Quantum-3920-feedback/m-p/260035#M51005</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-16T07:52:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Quantum 3920 feedback</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Quantum-3920-feedback/m-p/260040#M51008</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Interestingly, we now have this issue on the other appliance, after having changed the previously defined admin password.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 08:15:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Quantum-3920-feedback/m-p/260040#M51008</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex-</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-16T08:15:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Quantum 3920 feedback</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Quantum-3920-feedback/m-p/260045#M51010</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I checked with customer and he told me they changed all 4 passwords, no issues.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 09:19:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Quantum-3920-feedback/m-p/260045#M51010</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-16T09:19:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Quantum 3920 feedback</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Quantum-3920-feedback/m-p/261855#M51337</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Identified as&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;PRHF-42465.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;TAC can be approached to provide a port until it's implemented in the GA JHF.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 09:38:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Quantum-3920-feedback/m-p/261855#M51337</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex-</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-05T09:38:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

