<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Sync Redundancy in ClusterXL with MDPS in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sync-Redundancy-in-ClusterXL-with-MDPS/m-p/259465#M50885</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Have you reached out to TAC as suggested previously?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 14:59:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-10-08T14:59:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Sync Redundancy in ClusterXL with MDPS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sync-Redundancy-in-ClusterXL-with-MDPS/m-p/248005#M48445</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Setting up a new cluster with 19200-appliances running 81.20 take98 with "Management Data Plane Separation (MDPS)". These appliances has two sync-interfaces and seem to be best practice to create a bond if you want to have&amp;nbsp;Sync Redundancy but there is one problem here. One Synch-interface (Synch) is shown i Mplane and the other synch-interface (Synch2) is shown i Dplane.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Why?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Management Data Plane Separation (MDPS) and&amp;nbsp;Sync Redundancy in ClusterXL using bond-interface not supportet?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anders&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 13:30:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sync-Redundancy-in-ClusterXL-with-MDPS/m-p/248005#M48445</guid>
      <dc:creator>andersplarsson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-02T13:30:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sync Redundancy in ClusterXL with MDPS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sync-Redundancy-in-ClusterXL-with-MDPS/m-p/248033#M48451</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What was your order of operations, is the bond configured / present before enabling mdps?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 06:06:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sync-Redundancy-in-ClusterXL-with-MDPS/m-p/248033#M48451</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-03T06:06:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sync Redundancy in ClusterXL with MDPS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sync-Redundancy-in-ClusterXL-with-MDPS/m-p/248080#M48458</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;The bond was not configured since before no. MDPS was implemented from start. The gateways has not yet been completely set up yet.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So first the firts-time wizard was completed (set of MGMT, Synch, NTP, DNS -ip:s was set), then upgraded to take98 (R81.20) then configuration of MDPS was done.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anders&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 07:05:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sync-Redundancy-in-ClusterXL-with-MDPS/m-p/248080#M48458</guid>
      <dc:creator>andersplarsson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-05T07:05:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sync Redundancy in ClusterXL with MDPS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sync-Redundancy-in-ClusterXL-with-MDPS/m-p/248087#M48461</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you follow the configuration procedure per&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;sk138672 and continue to have difficulty please reach out to TAC.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 10:03:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sync-Redundancy-in-ClusterXL-with-MDPS/m-p/248087#M48461</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-05T10:03:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sync Redundancy in ClusterXL with MDPS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sync-Redundancy-in-ClusterXL-with-MDPS/m-p/248101#M48464</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For what is worth, this is what AI says...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;H3 class="" data-start="267" data-end="304"&gt;1. &lt;STRONG data-start="274" data-end="304"&gt;M-plane (Management Plane)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/H3&gt;
&lt;UL data-start="305" data-end="613"&gt;
&lt;LI class="" data-start="305" data-end="364"&gt;
&lt;P class="" data-start="307" data-end="364"&gt;Handles configuration, fault, and performance management.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI class="" data-start="365" data-end="613"&gt;
&lt;P class="" data-start="367" data-end="439"&gt;If a &lt;STRONG data-start="372" data-end="391"&gt;Synch interface&lt;/STRONG&gt; is shown here (Synch), it's typically used for:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL data-start="442" data-end="613"&gt;
&lt;LI class="" data-start="442" data-end="481"&gt;
&lt;P class="" data-start="444" data-end="481"&gt;Synchronization of configuration data&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI class="" data-start="484" data-end="511"&gt;
&lt;P class="" data-start="486" data-end="511"&gt;Managing software updates&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI class="" data-start="514" data-end="578"&gt;
&lt;P class="" data-start="516" data-end="578"&gt;Interfacing with centralized management systems (like EMS/NMS)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI class="" data-start="581" data-end="613"&gt;
&lt;P class="" data-start="583" data-end="613"&gt;It might be logical or virtual&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;H3 class="" data-start="615" data-end="646"&gt;2. &lt;STRONG data-start="622" data-end="646"&gt;D-plane (Data Plane)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/H3&gt;
&lt;UL data-start="647" data-end="933"&gt;
&lt;LI class="" data-start="647" data-end="700"&gt;
&lt;P class="" data-start="649" data-end="700"&gt;Handles user traffic and real-time data processing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI class="" data-start="701" data-end="933"&gt;
&lt;P class="" data-start="703" data-end="738"&gt;If &lt;STRONG data-start="706" data-end="716"&gt;Synch2&lt;/STRONG&gt; appears here, it may:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL data-start="741" data-end="933"&gt;
&lt;LI class="" data-start="741" data-end="833"&gt;
&lt;P class="" data-start="743" data-end="833"&gt;Be used for time synchronization (e.g., &lt;STRONG data-start="783" data-end="790"&gt;PTP&lt;/STRONG&gt;, &lt;STRONG data-start="792" data-end="801"&gt;SyncE&lt;/STRONG&gt;) between nodes or base stations&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI class="" data-start="836" data-end="933"&gt;
&lt;P class="" data-start="838" data-end="933"&gt;Be a physical interface connected to a synchronization source (like GNSS, boundary clock, etc.)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 12:35:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sync-Redundancy-in-ClusterXL-with-MDPS/m-p/248101#M48464</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-05T12:35:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sync Redundancy in ClusterXL with MDPS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sync-Redundancy-in-ClusterXL-with-MDPS/m-p/248109#M48467</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please stop posting these unless you've personally validated them as fact.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I for one would hate for the AI to start believing its own terrible insights/answers.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 14:02:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sync-Redundancy-in-ClusterXL-with-MDPS/m-p/248109#M48467</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-05T14:02:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sync Redundancy in ClusterXL with MDPS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sync-Redundancy-in-ClusterXL-with-MDPS/m-p/248110#M48468</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You are 100% right, I find most of those AI answers now are not super useful.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 14:19:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sync-Redundancy-in-ClusterXL-with-MDPS/m-p/248110#M48468</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-05T14:19:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sync Redundancy in ClusterXL with MDPS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sync-Redundancy-in-ClusterXL-with-MDPS/m-p/259430#M50884</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I´m in the exact same situation. Did you find a solution for this? Remove Sync from Mplane and create bond in dplane and move it back?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anders&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 13:01:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sync-Redundancy-in-ClusterXL-with-MDPS/m-p/259430#M50884</guid>
      <dc:creator>andersplarsson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-08T13:01:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sync Redundancy in ClusterXL with MDPS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sync-Redundancy-in-ClusterXL-with-MDPS/m-p/259465#M50885</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Have you reached out to TAC as suggested previously?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 14:59:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sync-Redundancy-in-ClusterXL-with-MDPS/m-p/259465#M50885</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-08T14:59:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

