<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Using Cluster Object in NAT rules in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Using-Cluster-Object-in-NAT-rules/m-p/257808#M50541</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey mate,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Did you end up figuring this out?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2025 00:30:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-09-20T00:30:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Using Cluster Object in NAT rules</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Using-Cluster-Object-in-NAT-rules/m-p/257302#M50421</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, I used the Cluster object in the NAT rules but the traffic is only NATed to the primary Cluster IP and not to the outgoing Cluster IP. What did I do wrong here?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 17:56:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Using-Cluster-Object-in-NAT-rules/m-p/257302#M50421</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mahajem</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-15T17:56:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using Cluster Object in NAT rules</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Using-Cluster-Object-in-NAT-rules/m-p/257305#M50423</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What version of code are you running on your SMS/MDS?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 19:18:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Using-Cluster-Object-in-NAT-rules/m-p/257305#M50423</guid>
      <dc:creator>AaronCP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-15T19:18:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using Cluster Object in NAT rules</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Using-Cluster-Object-in-NAT-rules/m-p/257306#M50424</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you have a failover, things that rely on that rule will NOT work, as new active member would not be associated with it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 19:19:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Using-Cluster-Object-in-NAT-rules/m-p/257306#M50424</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-15T19:19:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using Cluster Object in NAT rules</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Using-Cluster-Object-in-NAT-rules/m-p/257313#M50425</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;By default, all traffic from cluster member is translated to VIP of cluster and going over active member (from standby over sync interface to active member).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can use "no-NAT" rules to force cluster members to use their physical IP instead of cluster VIP.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 20:16:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Using-Cluster-Object-in-NAT-rules/m-p/257313#M50425</guid>
      <dc:creator>JozkoMrkvicka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-15T20:16:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using Cluster Object in NAT rules</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Using-Cluster-Object-in-NAT-rules/m-p/257317#M50428</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thats actually really good idea, no-nat, agree.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 21:15:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Using-Cluster-Object-in-NAT-rules/m-p/257317#M50428</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-15T21:15:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using Cluster Object in NAT rules</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Using-Cluster-Object-in-NAT-rules/m-p/257808#M50541</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey mate,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Did you end up figuring this out?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2025 00:30:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Using-Cluster-Object-in-NAT-rules/m-p/257808#M50541</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-20T00:30:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

