<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Route based VPN with palo alto firewall in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Route-based-VPN-with-palo-alto-firewall/m-p/257535#M50460</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Through static route? I doubt it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 17:56:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-09-17T17:56:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Route based VPN with palo alto firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Route-based-VPN-with-palo-alto-firewall/m-p/257523#M50457</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we are trying to &amp;nbsp;establish route based vpn with palo alto firewall as requirement is to have automatic tunnel and traffic failover from pa side as they are using 2 isp.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;on palo alto side, they configured static route with path monitoring to track the ip so incase that ip is unreachable, it failover to secondary tunnel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i want to know is this can be achieved through static routes. On palo alto side, failover happen but when traffic comes to checkpoint it still sending reply traffic through primary tunnel. Is there any way we can configure something like path monitoring that is in pa to monitor there tunnel interface ip?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 17:12:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Route-based-VPN-with-palo-alto-firewall/m-p/257523#M50457</guid>
      <dc:creator>an_technical</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-17T17:12:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Route based VPN with palo alto firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Route-based-VPN-with-palo-alto-firewall/m-p/257530#M50458</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there a specific reason you do not want to use Dynamic Routing here?&lt;BR /&gt;In R82, we have an object type "Network Probe" that could potentially do what you're after here.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 17:40:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Route-based-VPN-with-palo-alto-firewall/m-p/257530#M50458</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-17T17:40:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Route based VPN with palo alto firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Route-based-VPN-with-palo-alto-firewall/m-p/257532#M50459</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Customer dont want to do use dynamic routing. Is there anyway we an achieve this?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 17:43:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Route-based-VPN-with-palo-alto-firewall/m-p/257532#M50459</guid>
      <dc:creator>an_technical</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-17T17:43:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Route based VPN with palo alto firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Route-based-VPN-with-palo-alto-firewall/m-p/257535#M50460</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Through static route? I doubt it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 17:56:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Route-based-VPN-with-palo-alto-firewall/m-p/257535#M50460</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-17T17:56:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Route based VPN with palo alto firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Route-based-VPN-with-palo-alto-firewall/m-p/257536#M50461</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I imagine it would be similar to the configuration for AWS, which prefers Dynamic Routing:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk100726" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk100726&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 18:02:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Route-based-VPN-with-palo-alto-firewall/m-p/257536#M50461</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-17T18:02:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

