<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Checkpoint Active-Active Traffic Handling in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Checkpoint-Active-Active-Traffic-Handling/m-p/250120#M48867</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have two Firewall as JKTFW1 and JKTFW2&lt;BR /&gt;Mode: Cluster Load sharing Multicast 50/50&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;JKTFW1 and JKTFW2 having 5 interface:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Mgmt&lt;BR /&gt;- eth1-01&lt;BR /&gt;- eth1-02&lt;BR /&gt;- eth1-03&lt;BR /&gt;- eth1-04&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cluster status show Active/Active and both Firewall JKTFW1 and JKTFW2 handle the traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. If JKTFW1 , Mgmt interface goes down then cluster status show below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;JKTFW1 &amp;gt; DOWN&lt;BR /&gt;JKTFW2 &amp;gt; Active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. So is this the full fail-over happen like JKTFW2 handle the all traffic?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. If eth1-01 interface goes down also status show same so question is , only eth1-01 interface is not handle by JKTFW1 and remaining interface handle because we configured Active/Active?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My requirement:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. I don't want that if Mgmt. interface goes down also I don't want JKTFW1 cluster goes DOWN I still want that JKTFW1 handle the remaining interface traffic expect Mgmt. because Mgmt is down so is this possible ?????&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Saranya&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 07:42:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Saranya_0305</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-05-29T07:42:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Checkpoint Active-Active Traffic Handling</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Checkpoint-Active-Active-Traffic-Handling/m-p/250120#M48867</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have two Firewall as JKTFW1 and JKTFW2&lt;BR /&gt;Mode: Cluster Load sharing Multicast 50/50&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;JKTFW1 and JKTFW2 having 5 interface:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Mgmt&lt;BR /&gt;- eth1-01&lt;BR /&gt;- eth1-02&lt;BR /&gt;- eth1-03&lt;BR /&gt;- eth1-04&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cluster status show Active/Active and both Firewall JKTFW1 and JKTFW2 handle the traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. If JKTFW1 , Mgmt interface goes down then cluster status show below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;JKTFW1 &amp;gt; DOWN&lt;BR /&gt;JKTFW2 &amp;gt; Active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. So is this the full fail-over happen like JKTFW2 handle the all traffic?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. If eth1-01 interface goes down also status show same so question is , only eth1-01 interface is not handle by JKTFW1 and remaining interface handle because we configured Active/Active?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My requirement:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. I don't want that if Mgmt. interface goes down also I don't want JKTFW1 cluster goes DOWN I still want that JKTFW1 handle the remaining interface traffic expect Mgmt. because Mgmt is down so is this possible ?????&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Saranya&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 07:42:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Checkpoint-Active-Active-Traffic-Handling/m-p/250120#M48867</guid>
      <dc:creator>Saranya_0305</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-29T07:42:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Checkpoint Active-Active Traffic Handling</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Checkpoint-Active-Active-Traffic-Handling/m-p/250135#M48868</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You can make the MGMT interface private from a topology perspective (it won't have a VIP)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 11:45:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Checkpoint-Active-Active-Traffic-Handling/m-p/250135#M48868</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-29T11:45:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

