<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VSX with BGP in different GAIA versions in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-with-BGP-in-different-GAIA-versions/m-p/247563#M48356</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I dont even recall having to configure local address setting.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:49:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-04-29T00:49:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VSX with BGP in different GAIA versions</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-with-BGP-in-different-GAIA-versions/m-p/247067#M48220</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We noticed that the BGP protocol configuration for virtual systems in different GAIA versions began to differ.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a virtual system that is peered via BGP. Peering interface settings:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;GW1-VSX-81.20:1&amp;gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;show interface eth2.102&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;state on&lt;BR /&gt;mac-addr 00:50:56:ae:75:cd&lt;BR /&gt;type vlan&lt;BR /&gt;instance 1&lt;BR /&gt;ipv4-address 10.1.102.77/24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Virtual system service interface settings:&lt;BR /&gt;eth2.102@if4: &amp;lt;BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP&amp;gt; mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP qlen 1000&lt;BR /&gt;inet 192.168.196.17/28 brd 192.168.196.196.31 scope global eth2.102&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In versions R80.40 and R81.10 the configuration of the peer link could look like this:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;set bgp external remote-as 65001 on&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;set bgp external remote-as 65001 local-address 10.1.102.77 on&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And in R81.20, it became impossible to bind interface address to bgp remote-as on a virtual system:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;GW1-VSX-81.20:1&amp;gt; &lt;EM&gt;set bgp external remote-as 65001 local-address 10.1.102.77 on&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;RTGRTG0019 BGP: Address 10.1.102.77 does not belong to any interface.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and we have to use such as workaround:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;set bgp external remote-as 65001 on&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;set bgp external remote-as 65001 local-address 192.168.196.17 on&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 06:58:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-with-BGP-in-different-GAIA-versions/m-p/247067#M48220</guid>
      <dc:creator>yura_k</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-23T06:58:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VSX with BGP in different GAIA versions</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-with-BGP-in-different-GAIA-versions/m-p/247072#M48221</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/108389"&gt;@yura_k&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;with R81.20 some changes are implemented for dynamic routing protocols to be more compliant with the RFCs and recommendations. We had a problem with OSPF interfaces in the past after switch to R81.20&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Maestro/max-interfaces-OSPF/m-p/199829#M2337" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Maestro/max-interfaces-OSPF/m-p/199829#M2337&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Open a case with TAC to check your need.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 08:03:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-with-BGP-in-different-GAIA-versions/m-p/247072#M48221</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-23T08:03:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VSX with BGP in different GAIA versions</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-with-BGP-in-different-GAIA-versions/m-p/247487#M48342</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If this is a cluster (looks like it is) then you shouldn't be configuring local address per:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81.20/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81.20_Gaia_Advanced_Routing_AdminGuide/Content/Topics-GARG/BGP-Configuring-in-Gaia-Clish-External-BGP.htm" target="_blank"&gt;https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81.20/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81.20_Gaia_Advanced_Routing_AdminGuide/Content/Topics-GARG/BGP-Configuring-in-Gaia-Clish-External-BGP.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 04:17:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-with-BGP-in-different-GAIA-versions/m-p/247487#M48342</guid>
      <dc:creator>emmap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-28T04:17:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VSX with BGP in different GAIA versions</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-with-BGP-in-different-GAIA-versions/m-p/247497#M48344</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Emma! The BGP speaker is a virtual system, not a VSX cluster node.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 07:45:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-with-BGP-in-different-GAIA-versions/m-p/247497#M48344</guid>
      <dc:creator>yura_k</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-28T07:45:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VSX with BGP in different GAIA versions</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-with-BGP-in-different-GAIA-versions/m-p/247503#M48345</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes but it's a VS on a cluster, yes? That still counts.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 09:43:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-with-BGP-in-different-GAIA-versions/m-p/247503#M48345</guid>
      <dc:creator>emmap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-28T09:43:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VSX with BGP in different GAIA versions</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-with-BGP-in-different-GAIA-versions/m-p/247563#M48356</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I dont even recall having to configure local address setting.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:49:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-with-BGP-in-different-GAIA-versions/m-p/247563#M48356</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-29T00:49:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

