<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: question regarding limitation of Lightspeed 100G interfaces and enabling UPPAK in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/question-regarding-limitation-of-Lightspeed-100G-interfaces-and/m-p/247113#M48225</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;VPN was discussed at CPX.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also as I recall UPPAK offers some mild improvement for TP unrelated to the 100G NIC at this time.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;sk179432 is a further useful source of relevant detail.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 13:00:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-04-23T13:00:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>question regarding limitation of Lightspeed 100G interfaces and enabling UPPAK</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/question-regarding-limitation-of-Lightspeed-100G-interfaces-and/m-p/247110#M48224</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We want to enable UPPAK to get some of the benefits, but with MLS / QLS appliances&amp;nbsp;there are still a lot of limitations following&amp;nbsp;&lt;A title="Known Limitations (LightSpeed 10/25/40/100G QSFP28 Ports Administration Guide)" href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/Appliances/100G_Ports_AdminGuide/Content/Topics-100G-Card-AG/Known-Limitations.htm?tocpath=_____11" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Known Limitations (LightSpeed 10/25/40/100G QSFP28 Ports Administration Guide)&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I want to check maybe something changed...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;TABLE id="filter1Table" class="TableStyle-TP_Table_Dark_Header_and_Pattern" cellspacing="0"&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;
&lt;TR class="TableStyle-TP_Table_Dark_Header_and_Pattern-Body-Blue_Background_to_Highlight" data-mc-pattern="5"&gt;
&lt;TD colspan="6" class="TableStyle-TP_Table_Dark_Header_and_Pattern-BodyD-Column_Style-Blue_Background_to_Highlight"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_BladesFeatures.tp_sblades variable"&gt;Software Blades&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR class="TableStyle-TP_Table_Dark_Header_and_Pattern-Body-Grey_Background"&gt;
&lt;TD class="TableStyle-TP_Table_Dark_Header_and_Pattern-BodyE-Column_Style-Grey_Background"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Firewall&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD class="TableStyle-TP_Table_Dark_Header_and_Pattern-BodyE-Column_Style-Grey_Background"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_HW.tp_lightspeed_appliances variable"&gt;LightSpeed Appliances&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;QLS and MLS with&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_HW.tp_NVIDIA_CX_QSFP_ports_short variable"&gt;100G Ports&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;are shipped with a license that supports only the&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_Other.tp_fwcap variable"&gt;Firewall&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_BladesFeatures.tp_sblade variable"&gt;Software Blade&lt;/SPAN&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can purchase licenses for additional&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_BladesFeatures.tp_sblades variable"&gt;Software Blades&lt;/SPAN&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, the&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_HW.tp_NVIDIA_CX_QSFP_ports_short variable"&gt;100G Ports&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;accelerate the traffic only for the&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_Other.tp_fwcap variable"&gt;Firewall&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_BladesFeatures.tp_sblade variable"&gt;Software Blade&lt;/SPAN&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD class="TableStyle-TP_Table_Dark_Header_and_Pattern-BodyE-Column_Style-Grey_Background"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD class="TableStyle-TP_Table_Dark_Header_and_Pattern-BodyE-Column_Style-Grey_Background"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD class="TableStyle-TP_Table_Dark_Header_and_Pattern-BodyE-Column_Style-Grey_Background"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_Versions.r_ignis variable"&gt;R81.10&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD class="TableStyle-TP_Table_Dark_Header_and_Pattern-BodyD-Column_Style-Grey_Background"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TBODY&gt;
&lt;/TABLE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Still not yet a solution to accelerate other then firewall-blade traffic ?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;TABLE id="filter1Table" class="TableStyle-TP_Table_Dark_Header_and_Pattern" cellspacing="0"&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;
&lt;TR class="TableStyle-TP_Table_Dark_Header_and_Pattern-Body-White_Background"&gt;
&lt;TD class="TableStyle-TP_Table_Dark_Header_and_Pattern-BodyE-Column_Style-White_Background"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_Other.tp_ioc variable"&gt;IoC&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD class="TableStyle-TP_Table_Dark_Header_and_Pattern-BodyE-Column_Style-White_Background"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It is not supported to use the&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_BladesFeatures.tp_tp variable"&gt;Threat Prevention&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;Custom Intelligence Feeds feature (&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk132193" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;sk132193&lt;/A&gt;) to import IP Address lists to a blacklist.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD class="TableStyle-TP_Table_Dark_Header_and_Pattern-BodyE-Column_Style-White_Background"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD class="TableStyle-TP_Table_Dark_Header_and_Pattern-BodyE-Column_Style-White_Background"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD class="TableStyle-TP_Table_Dark_Header_and_Pattern-BodyE-Column_Style-White_Background"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_Versions.r_ignis variable"&gt;R81.10&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD class="TableStyle-TP_Table_Dark_Header_and_Pattern-BodyD-Column_Style-White_Background"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TBODY&gt;
&lt;/TABLE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We had this smooth running with 9300 appliances and UPPAK on, but there are no 100G interface in this gateways. But how about a solution with MLS200 ? &lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk132193" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;sk132193&lt;/A&gt; does not show any limitation regarding UPPAK.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 12:26:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/question-regarding-limitation-of-Lightspeed-100G-interfaces-and/m-p/247110#M48224</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-23T12:26:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: question regarding limitation of Lightspeed 100G interfaces and enabling UPPAK</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/question-regarding-limitation-of-Lightspeed-100G-interfaces-and/m-p/247113#M48225</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;VPN was discussed at CPX.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also as I recall UPPAK offers some mild improvement for TP unrelated to the 100G NIC at this time.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;sk179432 is a further useful source of relevant detail.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 13:00:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/question-regarding-limitation-of-Lightspeed-100G-interfaces-and/m-p/247113#M48225</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-23T13:00:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: question regarding limitation of Lightspeed 100G interfaces and enabling UPPAK</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/question-regarding-limitation-of-Lightspeed-100G-interfaces-and/m-p/247165#M48249</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Chris, following&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;sk179432, still only firewall blade will be accelerated.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 20:12:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/question-regarding-limitation-of-Lightspeed-100G-interfaces-and/m-p/247165#M48249</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-23T20:12:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

