<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Allow all VLANs on a Bridge Interface in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Allow-all-VLANs-on-a-Bridge-Interface/m-p/245415#M47799</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The only reason you get that is the kernel variable referenced doesn't exist.&lt;BR /&gt;Which means this SK is not correct, at least on current versions.&lt;BR /&gt;However, I think you should be ok if you disable anti-sppofing on the relevant bridge interface in SmartConsole.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 20:55:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-04-01T20:55:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Allow all VLANs on a Bridge Interface</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Allow-all-VLANs-on-a-Bridge-Interface/m-p/245284#M47770</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, Mates.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to configure in the “Bridge Mode” interface of a FW CP, the option to allow all VLANS?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have 1 box with 2 interfaces in bridge mode.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This box is in the middle of 2 Routers, which currently have configured on the ports that connects them, multiple VLANs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So, I want the br1 interface that has my 2 physical interfaces to “allow all these VLANs without any exception”.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The routers currently pass more than 30 VLANs, and manually making 1 bridge group for each VLAN is not very productive.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to make the br1 interface that has the 2 physical interfaces as such, “allow” all VLANs?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Greetings.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 19:00:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Allow-all-VLANs-on-a-Bridge-Interface/m-p/245284#M47770</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matlu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-31T19:00:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Allow all VLANs on a Bridge Interface</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Allow-all-VLANs-on-a-Bridge-Interface/m-p/245298#M47774</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;From what I remember, if you just create a bridge with just the physical interfaces, it will pass all the VLANs.&lt;BR /&gt;That's basically what this SK does while telling you to also disable bridge anti-spoofing (needed in this case):&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk34312" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk34312&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 21:01:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Allow-all-VLANs-on-a-Bridge-Interface/m-p/245298#M47774</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-31T21:01:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Allow all VLANs on a Bridge Interface</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Allow-all-VLANs-on-a-Bridge-Interface/m-p/245301#M47775</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If I apply the SK, how can you validate that the change has actually been made and has the value recommended in the document?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;To disable Anti-Spoofing, set the global parameter&lt;EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;fw_bridge_antispoofing&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;to 0.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;[Expert@Hostname] # fw ctl set int fw_bridge_antispoofing 0&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Note:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;This configuration will be lost after the reboot.&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;To set it to be permanent, run:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;[Expert@Hostname]# echo "fw_bridge_antispoofing=0"&amp;gt;&amp;gt; $FWDIR/modules/fwkern.conf&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 21:45:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Allow-all-VLANs-on-a-Bridge-Interface/m-p/245301#M47775</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matlu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-31T21:45:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Allow all VLANs on a Bridge Interface</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Allow-all-VLANs-on-a-Bridge-Interface/m-p/245302#M47776</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;To confirm the setting&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;[Expert@Hostname] # fw ctl get int fw_bridge_antispoofing&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 21:57:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Allow-all-VLANs-on-a-Bridge-Interface/m-p/245302#M47776</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-31T21:57:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Allow all VLANs on a Bridge Interface</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Allow-all-VLANs-on-a-Bridge-Interface/m-p/245414#M47798</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The option to validate the current antispoofing status does not seem to work.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is the command you shared correct?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;[Expert@FW-WF:0]#&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;[Expert@FW-WF:0]# fw ctl get int fw_bridge_antispoofing&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Get operation failed: failed to get parameter fw_bridge_antispoofing&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;get: Operation failed&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Killed&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;STRONG&gt;.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 20:52:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Allow-all-VLANs-on-a-Bridge-Interface/m-p/245414#M47798</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matlu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-01T20:52:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Allow all VLANs on a Bridge Interface</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Allow-all-VLANs-on-a-Bridge-Interface/m-p/245415#M47799</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The only reason you get that is the kernel variable referenced doesn't exist.&lt;BR /&gt;Which means this SK is not correct, at least on current versions.&lt;BR /&gt;However, I think you should be ok if you disable anti-sppofing on the relevant bridge interface in SmartConsole.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 20:55:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Allow-all-VLANs-on-a-Bridge-Interface/m-p/245415#M47799</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-01T20:55:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Allow all VLANs on a Bridge Interface</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Allow-all-VLANs-on-a-Bridge-Interface/m-p/245416#M47800</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So it should be enough if I remove the Antispoofing on the 2 interfaces that form the br1?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Because in the topology of the GW from the SmartConsole, there is no “br1” interface, but the 2 interfaces that make the “br1” appear.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 21:14:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Allow-all-VLANs-on-a-Bridge-Interface/m-p/245416#M47800</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matlu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-01T21:14:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Allow all VLANs on a Bridge Interface</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Allow-all-VLANs-on-a-Bridge-Interface/m-p/245418#M47802</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I believe you are correct: disable anti-spoofing on the two interfaces that make up br1.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If traffic originating from the gateway itself flows over the bridge, you will have to make other adjustments to account for "local interface anti-spoofing."&lt;BR /&gt;For that, see:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk105899" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk105899&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;If I'm understanding this correctly these steps disable anti-spoofing &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;globally&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; (not just on the bridge interface), among other things.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 21:31:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Allow-all-VLANs-on-a-Bridge-Interface/m-p/245418#M47802</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-01T21:31:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

