<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Sizing base on bandwidth for Cloud Guard Network Security in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-base-on-bandwidth-for-Cloud-Guard-Network-Security/m-p/237072#M45993</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a customer want to using Checkpoint in their Private Cloud (KVM Environment) - Cluster HA (Active/Standby)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Physical Network: 2x 10Gbps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Physical Host running VM Firewall: Chip 6448Y&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Blade FW only.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- Throughput ~ 40Gbs&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am planning to this license:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE width="503px"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD width="193.675px"&gt;CPSG-VSEC-VEN-BUN-NGTP-*Y&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="308.525px"&gt;1 CloudGuard Network virtual core for VMware ESXi, Hyper-V, KVM Gateway. Annual subscription for * year.&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tested 16 vCore =&amp;gt; overload.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;So, I just want to ask that with that such traffic/&lt;SPAN&gt;throughput&lt;/SPAN&gt;, can 32 vCore handle it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope anyone who have experience in this can help and give me your opinion, before I'm doing another test with 32 vCore.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &amp;amp; Best Regards.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2024 19:36:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mk_83</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-12-28T19:36:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Sizing base on bandwidth for Cloud Guard Network Security</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-base-on-bandwidth-for-Cloud-Guard-Network-Security/m-p/237072#M45993</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a customer want to using Checkpoint in their Private Cloud (KVM Environment) - Cluster HA (Active/Standby)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Physical Network: 2x 10Gbps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Physical Host running VM Firewall: Chip 6448Y&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Blade FW only.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- Throughput ~ 40Gbs&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am planning to this license:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE width="503px"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD width="193.675px"&gt;CPSG-VSEC-VEN-BUN-NGTP-*Y&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="308.525px"&gt;1 CloudGuard Network virtual core for VMware ESXi, Hyper-V, KVM Gateway. Annual subscription for * year.&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tested 16 vCore =&amp;gt; overload.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;So, I just want to ask that with that such traffic/&lt;SPAN&gt;throughput&lt;/SPAN&gt;, can 32 vCore handle it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope anyone who have experience in this can help and give me your opinion, before I'm doing another test with 32 vCore.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &amp;amp; Best Regards.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2024 19:36:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-base-on-bandwidth-for-Cloud-Guard-Network-Security/m-p/237072#M45993</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mk_83</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-28T19:36:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sizing base on bandwidth for Cloud Guard Network Security</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-base-on-bandwidth-for-Cloud-Guard-Network-Security/m-p/237099#M46017</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In general I would suggest working with your local Check Point SE / rep on this who can engage solution center where required.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What throughput did you see with the 16-cores?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Likely we are missing some details but the networking seems not to align with the throughput requirements?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Dec 2024 02:13:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-base-on-bandwidth-for-Cloud-Guard-Network-Security/m-p/237099#M46017</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-29T02:13:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sizing base on bandwidth for Cloud Guard Network Security</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-base-on-bandwidth-for-Cloud-Guard-Network-Security/m-p/237100#M46018</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Are there any online sizing tools to feed the results of cpsizeme to?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Dec 2024 02:34:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-base-on-bandwidth-for-Cloud-Guard-Network-Security/m-p/237100#M46018</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlekzNet</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-29T02:34:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sizing base on bandwidth for Cloud Guard Network Security</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-base-on-bandwidth-for-Cloud-Guard-Network-Security/m-p/237102#M46019</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Appliance Sizing Tool should be available to partners as I recall but its not entirely applicable here.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Dec 2024 03:20:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-base-on-bandwidth-for-Cloud-Guard-Network-Security/m-p/237102#M46019</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-29T03:20:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sizing base on bandwidth for Cloud Guard Network Security</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-base-on-bandwidth-for-Cloud-Guard-Network-Security/m-p/237128#M46024</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you, by any chance, have the direct link to this sizing tool? I can not find it anywhere... The closest is &lt;A href="https://catalog.checkpoint.com/cat/quantum/security_gateway" target="_blank"&gt;https://catalog.checkpoint.com/cat/quantum/security_gateway&lt;/A&gt; , but I wonder if there is anything more intelligent.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Dec 2024 20:57:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-base-on-bandwidth-for-Cloud-Guard-Network-Security/m-p/237128#M46024</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlekzNet</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-29T20:57:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sizing base on bandwidth for Cloud Guard Network Security</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-base-on-bandwidth-for-Cloud-Guard-Network-Security/m-p/237138#M46026</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;sk144133 provides a link to the tool I mentioned above, but again it is appliance centric.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2024 01:05:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-base-on-bandwidth-for-Cloud-Guard-Network-Security/m-p/237138#M46026</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-30T01:05:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sizing base on bandwidth for Cloud Guard Network Security</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-base-on-bandwidth-for-Cloud-Guard-Network-Security/m-p/237184#M46031</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks much Chris! That's exactly what I needed (sorry for hijacking the thread &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":smiling_face_with_halo:"&gt;😇&lt;/span&gt; )&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2024 15:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-base-on-bandwidth-for-Cloud-Guard-Network-Security/m-p/237184#M46031</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlekzNet</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-30T15:21:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sizing base on bandwidth for Cloud Guard Network Security</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-base-on-bandwidth-for-Cloud-Guard-Network-Security/m-p/237255#M46055</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The only problem is - it does not work. Regardless of what I enter or choose, it shows either:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Failed to get products for this CPSizeMe file. Please try to refresh the page"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Failed to get products for this settings. Please try to refresh the page"&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 00:50:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-base-on-bandwidth-for-Cloud-Guard-Network-Security/m-p/237255#M46055</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlekzNet</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-31T00:50:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sizing base on bandwidth for Cloud Guard Network Security</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-base-on-bandwidth-for-Cloud-Guard-Network-Security/m-p/237260#M46057</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Many things can impact performance.&lt;BR /&gt;We need a lot more details like:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Version/JHF&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Precise testing methodology&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Scripts/S7PAC-Super-Seven-Performance-Assessment-Commands/m-p/40528#M703" target="_self"&gt;Super Seven output&lt;/A&gt; while testing&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In general, not sure that you can get that sort of performance in virtualized environments.&lt;BR /&gt;As&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3630"&gt;@Chris_Atkinson&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;said, you should work with your Check Point SE on your precise requirements.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 01:20:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-base-on-bandwidth-for-Cloud-Guard-Network-Security/m-p/237260#M46057</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-31T01:20:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

