https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Reflections-on-PRHF-33710-In-a-VSX-Cluster-environment-the/m-p/232295#M44834 <P>Hi.<BR /><BR />I upgraded our vsx-cluster on our secondary site last sunday from R81.10 to R81.20 take 84.<BR />I notice that the overall cpu usage raised after the upgrade and it looks like it is the cpview daemon that is the cause.<BR />The issue is solved in take 89 but I skipped that version because of the issues with&nbsp;sk182819.<BR /><BR />Any thoughts on if I should stay on R81.10 on the primary site and wait for next JHF for R81.20 or is it safe to upgrade to take 84 depending on the affect the cpviewd issue has on the gateways?</P> Mon, 11 Nov 2024 09:26:17 GMT Mattias_Jansson 2024-11-11T09:26:17Z https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Reflections-on-PRHF-33710-In-a-VSX-Cluster-environment-the/m-p/232295#M44834 <P>Hi.<BR /><BR />I upgraded our vsx-cluster on our secondary site last sunday from R81.10 to R81.20 take 84.<BR />I notice that the overall cpu usage raised after the upgrade and it looks like it is the cpview daemon that is the cause.<BR />The issue is solved in take 89 but I skipped that version because of the issues with&nbsp;sk182819.<BR /><BR />Any thoughts on if I should stay on R81.10 on the primary site and wait for next JHF for R81.20 or is it safe to upgrade to take 84 depending on the affect the cpviewd issue has on the gateways?</P> Mon, 11 Nov 2024 09:26:17 GMT https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Reflections-on-PRHF-33710-In-a-VSX-Cluster-environment-the/m-p/232295#M44834 Mattias_Jansson 2024-11-11T09:26:17Z