<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic HA configuration with multiple ISP in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HA-configuration-with-multiple-ISP/m-p/231687#M44682</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;how to configure two ISP fail over when we are using multiple applications with public Ip address and NAT on checkpoint 81.20 9000 series firewall?&amp;nbsp; Do we need to DNS fail over if primary ISP fail ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:14:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ddesai</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-11-05T00:14:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HA configuration with multiple ISP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HA-configuration-with-multiple-ISP/m-p/231687#M44682</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;how to configure two ISP fail over when we are using multiple applications with public Ip address and NAT on checkpoint 81.20 9000 series firewall?&amp;nbsp; Do we need to DNS fail over if primary ISP fail ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:14:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HA-configuration-with-multiple-ISP/m-p/231687#M44682</guid>
      <dc:creator>ddesai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-05T00:14:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA configuration with multiple ISP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HA-configuration-with-multiple-ISP/m-p/231691#M44685</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Depends entirely on the routing and who the IP address belongs to, if they're specific to the ISP (non-portable) then something like DNS manipulations with corresponding NAT would be mandatory I would imagine.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 03:28:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HA-configuration-with-multiple-ISP/m-p/231691#M44685</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-05T03:28:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA configuration with multiple ISP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HA-configuration-with-multiple-ISP/m-p/231738#M44699</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you don't have provider-independent IP addresses and aren't using BGP, then DNS changes will most certainly be required to fail over publicly hosted applications.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 14:37:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HA-configuration-with-multiple-ISP/m-p/231738#M44699</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-05T14:37:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

