<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: weird issue with 40Gbit Module and new 29100 Plus appliances in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/weird-issue-with-40Gbit-Module-and-new-29100-Plus-appliances/m-p/230329#M44327</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Was that the problem? Seems unlikely six different boxes would all have the wrong transceivers inserted in the same slot and the right transceivers inserted in the same slot.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 20:06:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bob_Zimmerman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-10-21T20:06:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>weird issue with 40Gbit Module and new 29100 Plus appliances</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/weird-issue-with-40Gbit-Module-and-new-29100-Plus-appliances/m-p/229377#M44175</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;we have 6 spare (for now there isnt' any cluster configuration ) 29100 plus appliances ( 81.20 Take 84 ) ,each one is equipped with 1 of this module&lt;/P&gt;&lt;H3&gt;&lt;FONT size="4"&gt;2 Port 40GBase QSFP+ / 100GBase QSFP28 interface card for 9000/19000/29000 appliances -&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;CPAC-2-40/100F-D.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;Both the port of EACH gateway are connected to a cisco ACI LEAF where all the ports are configured in the same way.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="4"&gt;What is my problem?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="4"&gt;Only the port2 of EACH modulo goes up.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="4"&gt;Is not a Cisco ACI issue or a QSFP+ issue or a fiber issue because we tried to&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/H3&gt;&lt;P&gt;change port on cisco ACI moving ,and in every port&amp;nbsp; ...module port2 is working,module port1 doesn't.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;move all the QSFP and fiber from port2 to port1 , on port2 everything is working fine,in port1 we see only "link down".&lt;BR /&gt;Remember that this issue occurs on SIX spare 29100 with SIX different module connected to different leaf on ACI and we tried to change/swap anything&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The only difference I can see from CP pov is this one :&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;[Expert@:0]# ethtool --show-fec eth4-01&lt;BR /&gt;FEC parameters for eth4-01:&lt;BR /&gt;Configured FEC encodings: Auto&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Active FEC encoding: Auto&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;[Expert@0]# ethtool --show-fec eth4-02&lt;BR /&gt;FEC parameters for eth4-02:&lt;BR /&gt;Configured FEC encodings: Auto&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Active FEC encoding: Off&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;the "Active FEC encoding" it's indipendent and cannot be changed with " ethtool --set-fec eth4-01 encoding 'parameter' "&lt;BR /&gt;Even if I change Fec Encoding to none ,or RB or Baser the&amp;nbsp;"Active FEC encoding" remain Auto in port eth4-01 and Off in port eth4-02&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any idea?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2024 12:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/weird-issue-with-40Gbit-Module-and-new-29100-Plus-appliances/m-p/229377#M44175</guid>
      <dc:creator>AleLovaz82</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-10T12:01:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: weird issue with 40Gbit Module and new 29100 Plus appliances</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/weird-issue-with-40Gbit-Module-and-new-29100-Plus-appliances/m-p/229401#M44177</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The forward error correction is negotiated. "Configured FEC encodings" is what you can control. "Active FEC encoding" tells you what value was negotiated, and "Auto" just means it hasn't negotiated a value. It's like the difference in lspci output between&amp;nbsp;LnkCap (Link Capabilities) and&amp;nbsp;LnkSta (Link State; a card which is capable of 8 GT/s and 16x width could be used in a slot supporting only 2.5 GT/s and 4x).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What does 'ethtool -m' show on each interface? Do they both recognize their transceivers? Do both transceivers show received light?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2024 14:17:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/weird-issue-with-40Gbit-Module-and-new-29100-Plus-appliances/m-p/229401#M44177</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bob_Zimmerman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-10T14:17:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: weird issue with 40Gbit Module and new 29100 Plus appliances</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/weird-issue-with-40Gbit-Module-and-new-29100-Plus-appliances/m-p/229412#M44183</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;ethtool -m eth4-01&lt;BR /&gt;Identifier : 0x11 (QSFP28)&lt;BR /&gt;holy s**t ,it's the 100gbit trasnceiver. The people in datacenter told us that they used QSFP+ in both the ports.&lt;BR /&gt;This should be the issue, thx for the hint , I never head the -m flag on ethtool !&lt;BR /&gt;tomorrow we'll see ,someone will change them&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2024 15:40:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/weird-issue-with-40Gbit-Module-and-new-29100-Plus-appliances/m-p/229412#M44183</guid>
      <dc:creator>AleLovaz82</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-10T15:40:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: weird issue with 40Gbit Module and new 29100 Plus appliances</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/weird-issue-with-40Gbit-Module-and-new-29100-Plus-appliances/m-p/230329#M44327</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Was that the problem? Seems unlikely six different boxes would all have the wrong transceivers inserted in the same slot and the right transceivers inserted in the same slot.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 20:06:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/weird-issue-with-40Gbit-Module-and-new-29100-Plus-appliances/m-p/230329#M44327</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bob_Zimmerman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-21T20:06:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: weird issue with 40Gbit Module and new 29100 Plus appliances</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/weird-issue-with-40Gbit-Module-and-new-29100-Plus-appliances/m-p/230364#M44334</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Bob,&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;wrong SFP in each port 2 of each 29100, and also a cabling issue -.-'&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 07:18:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/weird-issue-with-40Gbit-Module-and-new-29100-Plus-appliances/m-p/230364#M44334</guid>
      <dc:creator>AleLovaz82</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-22T07:18:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

