<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: HyperFlow and VSX in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HyperFlow-and-VSX/m-p/229573#M44206</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Correct&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 09:48:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AmitShmuel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-10-14T09:48:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HyperFlow and VSX</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HyperFlow-and-VSX/m-p/226885#M43620</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Im trying to figure out some details on how HyperFlow works on VSX.&lt;BR /&gt;We have a 7000 Plus VSX Cluster, R81.20 T79 with 16 (32 HT) cores and multiple virtual systems.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Some of these virtual systems have 1 virtual core only.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What will happen in case of a heavy&amp;nbsp; connection/hyperflow connection,&amp;nbsp; will it be able to allocate more virtual cores (or more underlying physical cores for this 1 virtual&amp;nbsp; core) or will it be limited&amp;nbsp; by the number of cores allocated to the VS ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We did just have&amp;nbsp; an issue where on a 1-core VS where&amp;nbsp; some heavy connections seems to be handled by HyperFlow (PM was higher than 0, ref hyperflow sk),&amp;nbsp; but are unsure what resources&amp;nbsp; HyperFlow can use on a 1-core VS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 08:11:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HyperFlow-and-VSX/m-p/226885#M43620</guid>
      <dc:creator>PetterD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-17T08:11:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HyperFlow and VSX</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HyperFlow-and-VSX/m-p/226977#M43642</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Petter,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are you sure VSs have only 1 core allocated? This sounds strange to me as for HyperFlow to be enabled, you must have Dynamic Balancing running, and if that's the case, all VSs must have all CoreXL-FW cores allocated for them.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It may be that you're confusing cores with FW workers? It could definitely be that a certain VS has only 1 FW worker allocated for it, and when this 1 worker handles a heavy connection, HyperFlow will trigger, and use other cores to process this connection in parallel.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In general, HyperFlow will only trigger and use other cores if the overall utilization of the system allows it (lower than a certain threshold), which means that other VSs should not be affected by it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Amit&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 18:17:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HyperFlow-and-VSX/m-p/226977#M43642</guid>
      <dc:creator>AmitShmuel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-17T18:17:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HyperFlow and VSX</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HyperFlow-and-VSX/m-p/228047#M43872</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Amit,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the reply!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;On the Virtual System/VS-object i have defined 1 virtual core (which creates a fw worker process), i was just using wrong name (virtual core) &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are using Dynamic Balancing as its enabled by default on these Appliances in R81.20 so this means that a Virtual System with 1 FW worker (1 core assigned on the VS object) will still be able to use multiple physical underlaying cores on the box ? That definately makes sence as to what we see here&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 12:38:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HyperFlow-and-VSX/m-p/228047#M43872</guid>
      <dc:creator>PetterD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-26T12:38:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HyperFlow and VSX</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HyperFlow-and-VSX/m-p/229573#M44206</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Correct&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 09:48:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HyperFlow-and-VSX/m-p/229573#M44206</guid>
      <dc:creator>AmitShmuel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-14T09:48:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

