<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MVC R81.10 VSX VSLS Upgrade in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MVC-R81-10-VSX-VSLS-Upgrade/m-p/228210#M43892</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;So can i use also the blink image ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 12:57:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JacWev</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-09-27T12:57:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MVC R81.10 VSX VSLS Upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MVC-R81-10-VSX-VSLS-Upgrade/m-p/155784#M26565</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So am trying to do some MVC upgrades to R81.10 on VSX VSLS but am managing to get strange statuses.&lt;BR /&gt;For the first box it works like a charm, but when i do second member i end up in active / active / down and similar statuses.&lt;BR /&gt;This is a test environment running open servers and only 2 test VS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="vsx_mvc.jpg" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/17588iE65265BE9516BDE6/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="vsx_mvc.jpg" alt="vsx_mvc.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So process i have been doing is.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1: vsx_util upgrade&lt;BR /&gt;2: upgrade M3 with cpuse, (no HFA applied)&lt;BR /&gt;3:&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;cphaconf mvc on&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Here it currently has default policy.&lt;BR /&gt;Status Active on M3 GW and down on VS&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;4: Install policy on VSX Cluster&lt;BR /&gt;Successful on upgraded member and fail on none upgraded.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When upgrading M2 and have done the above on that one aswell.&lt;BR /&gt;I start to get the none wanted statuses on the VS.&lt;BR /&gt;Ofc i can disable interfaces in the infrastructure so active / active dosn´t matter.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What you guys recommending, adding the HFA before the mvc etc?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Magnus&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2022 15:36:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MVC-R81-10-VSX-VSLS-Upgrade/m-p/155784#M26565</guid>
      <dc:creator>Magnus-Holmberg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-26T15:36:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MVC R81.10 VSX VSLS Upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MVC-R81-10-VSX-VSLS-Upgrade/m-p/155787#M26566</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Looks like adding installing the HFA66 did do the trick to get correct statuses &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="mvc_vsx.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/17589iE7381100982F7FA2/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="mvc_vsx.png" alt="mvc_vsx.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2022 16:09:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MVC-R81-10-VSX-VSLS-Upgrade/m-p/155787#M26566</guid>
      <dc:creator>Magnus-Holmberg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-26T16:09:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MVC R81.10 VSX VSLS Upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MVC-R81-10-VSX-VSLS-Upgrade/m-p/155857#M26584</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I personally always trying to install latest (or known as good enough) JHF GA and try to sort out if upgrade is working fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Daniel.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2022 07:24:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MVC-R81-10-VSX-VSLS-Upgrade/m-p/155857#M26584</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel_Szydelko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-29T07:24:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MVC R81.10 VSX VSLS Upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MVC-R81-10-VSX-VSLS-Upgrade/m-p/228210#M43892</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So can i use also the blink image ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 12:57:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MVC-R81-10-VSX-VSLS-Upgrade/m-p/228210#M43892</guid>
      <dc:creator>JacWev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-27T12:57:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MVC R81.10 VSX VSLS Upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MVC-R81-10-VSX-VSLS-Upgrade/m-p/228574#M43961</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, you can.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 10:05:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MVC-R81-10-VSX-VSLS-Upgrade/m-p/228574#M43961</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel_Szydelko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-01T10:05:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

