<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PBR Not Working in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/PBR-Not-Working/m-p/226904#M43623</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;I'm having trouble getting the PBR configuration to work and could use some help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Network Configuration&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The firewall is connected as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="2024-09-17_19h21_39.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/27658i60464D718B3600A1/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="2024-09-17_19h21_39.png" alt="2024-09-17_19h21_39.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;eth1: Internet&lt;BR /&gt;eth2: Local Network (access to 10.100.0.0/16 via 10.100.1.1/24)&lt;BR /&gt;Mgmt: Management Network (10.100.254.0/24)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;What I Want to Achieve&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I want to synchronize time with the NTP server located at 10.100.253.1 through the Management network. However, due to the current routing, access to the NTP server goes through eth2. I want to correct this using PBR.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Current Configuration&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;Static Route&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;default via [eth1 nexthop]
10.100.0.0/16 via 10.100.1.1&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;PBR Table&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;set pbr table MgmtPbrTable static-route 10.100.253.1/32 nexthop gateway address 10.100.254.254 priority 1&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;# I have tried the following three patterns, but none of them worked:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Default route via 10.100.254.254&lt;BR /&gt;To 10.100.253.0/24 via 10.100.254.254&lt;BR /&gt;To 10.100.253.1/32 via 10.100.254.254&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;PBR Rule&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;set pbr rule priority 1 match from 10.100.254.1/32
set pbr rule priority 1 match to 10.100.253.1/32
set pbr rule priority 1 action table MgmtPbrTable&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;Additional Information&lt;/U&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When I added the static route 10.100.253.1/32 via 10.100.254.254, access worked correctly. However, this is not a viable solution because I want access from the Internet to the NTP server to go through eth2 as usual.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 10:35:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>IGSSV</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-09-17T10:35:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PBR Not Working</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/PBR-Not-Working/m-p/226904#M43623</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;I'm having trouble getting the PBR configuration to work and could use some help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Network Configuration&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The firewall is connected as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="2024-09-17_19h21_39.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/27658i60464D718B3600A1/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="2024-09-17_19h21_39.png" alt="2024-09-17_19h21_39.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;eth1: Internet&lt;BR /&gt;eth2: Local Network (access to 10.100.0.0/16 via 10.100.1.1/24)&lt;BR /&gt;Mgmt: Management Network (10.100.254.0/24)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;What I Want to Achieve&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I want to synchronize time with the NTP server located at 10.100.253.1 through the Management network. However, due to the current routing, access to the NTP server goes through eth2. I want to correct this using PBR.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Current Configuration&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;Static Route&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;default via [eth1 nexthop]
10.100.0.0/16 via 10.100.1.1&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;PBR Table&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;set pbr table MgmtPbrTable static-route 10.100.253.1/32 nexthop gateway address 10.100.254.254 priority 1&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;# I have tried the following three patterns, but none of them worked:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Default route via 10.100.254.254&lt;BR /&gt;To 10.100.253.0/24 via 10.100.254.254&lt;BR /&gt;To 10.100.253.1/32 via 10.100.254.254&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;PBR Rule&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;set pbr rule priority 1 match from 10.100.254.1/32
set pbr rule priority 1 match to 10.100.253.1/32
set pbr rule priority 1 action table MgmtPbrTable&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;Additional Information&lt;/U&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When I added the static route 10.100.253.1/32 via 10.100.254.254, access worked correctly. However, this is not a viable solution because I want access from the Internet to the NTP server to go through eth2 as usual.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 10:35:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/PBR-Not-Working/m-p/226904#M43623</guid>
      <dc:creator>IGSSV</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-17T10:35:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR Not Working</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/PBR-Not-Working/m-p/226905#M43624</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you're using NAT, check if the PBR policy is considering the IP before or after a NAT.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Test, if possible, changing the PBR to consider (or not) the NAT .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 10:39:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/PBR-Not-Working/m-p/226905#M43624</guid>
      <dc:creator>rrbranco</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-17T10:39:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR Not Working</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/PBR-Not-Working/m-p/226912#M43626</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Note&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Locally-generated traffic is considered a limitation of PBR per sk167135&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Perhaps a normal static route for the /32 can work for you (may also require an anti-spoofing exception).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 12:02:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/PBR-Not-Working/m-p/226912#M43626</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-17T12:02:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR Not Working</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/PBR-Not-Working/m-p/227019#M43649</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your prompt response and for clarifying the PBR limitation for locally-generated traffic as outlined in sk167135.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’ll look into using a normal static route for the /32, and consider the anti-spoofing exception if needed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I appreciate your help!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 04:05:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/PBR-Not-Working/m-p/227019#M43649</guid>
      <dc:creator>IGSSV</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-18T04:05:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

