<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: I am curious about the policy matching logic. in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/I-am-curious-about-the-policy-matching-logic/m-p/223303#M42817</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;take a look here for VOIP&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk95369" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk95369&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ATRG: VoIP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check the topology and all details.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Extra attentions to the rules according to your scenario and ports used.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Special attention to the following quotations:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Do not use this service in the same rule with the 'XXXXXX' service&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;(because they contradict each other).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Best regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 09:13:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rrbranco</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-08-12T09:13:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>I am curious about the policy matching logic.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/I-am-curious-about-the-policy-matching-logic/m-p/223294#M42816</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm curious about check point's policy matching method.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let's take an example&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As shown below, sip and custom-made udp-5060 were included in one policy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So which of the following two ports does the checkpoint match to?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As far as I know, Service is Any, and if there is a port conflict due to the 'match for any' option, it is determined randomly when installing the policy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, I cannot find any explanation as to the order in which they are matched when two conflicting ports are added to one policy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you know the policy matching logic or have any SK involved, please let me know&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a nice day and I'll wait for your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="2024-08-12_16-25-02.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/27206i1F4F98D124B6BA46/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="2024-08-12_16-25-02.png" alt="2024-08-12_16-25-02.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 07:40:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/I-am-curious-about-the-policy-matching-logic/m-p/223294#M42816</guid>
      <dc:creator>JaeYoung_An</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-12T07:40:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: I am curious about the policy matching logic.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/I-am-curious-about-the-policy-matching-logic/m-p/223303#M42817</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;take a look here for VOIP&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk95369" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk95369&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ATRG: VoIP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check the topology and all details.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Extra attentions to the rules according to your scenario and ports used.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Special attention to the following quotations:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Do not use this service in the same rule with the 'XXXXXX' service&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;(because they contradict each other).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Best regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 09:13:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/I-am-curious-about-the-policy-matching-logic/m-p/223303#M42817</guid>
      <dc:creator>rrbranco</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-12T09:13:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: I am curious about the policy matching logic.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/I-am-curious-about-the-policy-matching-logic/m-p/223304#M42818</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81.20/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81.20_SecurityManagement_AdminGuide/Content/Topics-SECMG/Rule-Matching-in-the-Access-Control-Policy.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;R81.20 Quantum Security Management Administration Guide - &lt;STRONG&gt;Rule&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Matching&lt;/STRONG&gt; in the Access Control Policy&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 09:24:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/I-am-curious-about-the-policy-matching-logic/m-p/223304#M42818</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-12T09:24:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: I am curious about the policy matching logic.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/I-am-curious-about-the-policy-matching-logic/m-p/223393#M42833</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You mean one rule?&lt;BR /&gt;The multiple "Match for Any" rules behavior is documented:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk150553" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk150553&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I assume it is similar when you add the services to the rule explicitly as well (i.e. it's random).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 21:29:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/I-am-curious-about-the-policy-matching-logic/m-p/223393#M42833</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-12T21:29:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

