<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: R81.20 ClusterXL distribution problem in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-20-ClusterXL-distribution-problem/m-p/218708#M41757</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This is correct but from R80.20 it is done with the:&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Cluster Correction Layer (CCL).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk169154" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk169154&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is this Maestro or VSX?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;VSX example:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81.20/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81.20_Chassis_AdminGuide/Content/Topics-Chassis-AG/NAT-and-Correction-Layer-on-VSX-Gateway.htm?tocpath=Managing%20Security%20Groups%7C_____14" target="_blank"&gt;https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81.20/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81.20_Chassis_AdminGuide/Content/Topics-Chassis-AG/NAT-and-Correction-Layer-on-VSX-Gateway.htm?tocpath=Managing%20Security%20Groups%7C_____14&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:01:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Lesley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-06-25T21:01:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>R81.20 ClusterXL distribution problem</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-20-ClusterXL-distribution-problem/m-p/218692#M41755</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Checkpoint Community,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’m facing a problem and can’t move forward with it. Current setup is a ClusterXL Act-Act , Load-Sharing Multicast mode ; OS = R81.20.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the firewall I’ve a Public IP translated to private IP ( normal destination nat ) using https.&amp;nbsp; Having both nodes up the traffic distribution goes to first fw1 were it get’s nat-ed, leaves via the internal interface and send a SYN to server.&amp;nbsp; But the respond goes to fw2 were there is no session for it and get’s dropped “first packet isn’t SYN “&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’ve already tried to change the tcp 3-way handshake synchronization mode from default value to “smart sync” – did not help. Changing in Global_prop &amp;nbsp;Stateful inspection setting for tcp out of state drop – did not help, Doing zdebug + drop I'm see also an error like: coockie validation error message. Here I need to mention that IPS is turned off.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Last information, this setup did work correctly on r80.40 version with exact the same settings – problem started in version 81.10 and .20. If you have any suggestions how to proceed, please let me know. Is there a way to hold / stick the session to the gateway who first received the packet from external (internet ) ?&amp;nbsp; One of my suspicions is that maybe the port nat pool which is divided between the two cluster members get exhausted.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any hint appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:44:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-20-ClusterXL-distribution-problem/m-p/218692#M41755</guid>
      <dc:creator>H4ppyM3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-25T18:44:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R81.20 ClusterXL distribution problem</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-20-ClusterXL-distribution-problem/m-p/218693#M41756</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I cant recall now where this setting is, but I believe its under cluster properties somewhere in smart console, sticky connections...can you see if thats on or off?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:48:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-20-ClusterXL-distribution-problem/m-p/218693#M41756</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-25T18:48:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R81.20 ClusterXL distribution problem</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-20-ClusterXL-distribution-problem/m-p/218708#M41757</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is correct but from R80.20 it is done with the:&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Cluster Correction Layer (CCL).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk169154" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk169154&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is this Maestro or VSX?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;VSX example:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81.20/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81.20_Chassis_AdminGuide/Content/Topics-Chassis-AG/NAT-and-Correction-Layer-on-VSX-Gateway.htm?tocpath=Managing%20Security%20Groups%7C_____14" target="_blank"&gt;https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81.20/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81.20_Chassis_AdminGuide/Content/Topics-Chassis-AG/NAT-and-Correction-Layer-on-VSX-Gateway.htm?tocpath=Managing%20Security%20Groups%7C_____14&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:01:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-20-ClusterXL-distribution-problem/m-p/218708#M41757</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lesley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-25T21:01:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R81.20 ClusterXL distribution problem</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-20-ClusterXL-distribution-problem/m-p/218732#M41767</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;it is not vsx or maestro. 2x appliances&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2024 05:51:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-20-ClusterXL-distribution-problem/m-p/218732#M41767</guid>
      <dc:creator>H4ppyM3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-26T05:51:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R81.20 ClusterXL distribution problem</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-20-ClusterXL-distribution-problem/m-p/218886#M41801</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Strongly suggest a TAC case, especially since this worked in an earlier version.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://help.checkpoint.com" target="_blank"&gt;https://help.checkpoint.com&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2024 21:58:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-20-ClusterXL-distribution-problem/m-p/218886#M41801</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-26T21:58:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

