<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: performance impact of sk34295 (How to configure DNS NAT) ? in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/performance-impact-of-sk34295-How-to-configure-DNS-NAT/m-p/211619#M40129</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't believe DNS traffic benefits from SecureXL that substantially, given the relatively short nature of a DNS query.&lt;BR /&gt;Never heard of a performance-related issue tied to this feature, either.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:28:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-04-17T14:28:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>performance impact of sk34295 (How to configure DNS NAT) ?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/performance-impact-of-sk34295-How-to-configure-DNS-NAT/m-p/211540#M40105</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Are there any performance impact following&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk34295" target="_blank"&gt;How to configure DNS NAT (checkpoint.com)&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If enabled all UDP-DNS traffic will be not accelerated by SecureXL but I think this has not much impact.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 05:08:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/performance-impact-of-sk34295-How-to-configure-DNS-NAT/m-p/211540#M40105</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-17T05:08:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: performance impact of sk34295 (How to configure DNS NAT) ?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/performance-impact-of-sk34295-How-to-configure-DNS-NAT/m-p/211619#M40129</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't believe DNS traffic benefits from SecureXL that substantially, given the relatively short nature of a DNS query.&lt;BR /&gt;Never heard of a performance-related issue tied to this feature, either.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:28:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/performance-impact-of-sk34295-How-to-configure-DNS-NAT/m-p/211619#M40129</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-17T14:28:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: performance impact of sk34295 (How to configure DNS NAT) ?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/performance-impact-of-sk34295-How-to-configure-DNS-NAT/m-p/211631#M40135</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Traffic subject to this feature cannot be handled fastpath and will be handled in at least the Medium Path.&amp;nbsp; It does not appear to always force this traffic F2F/slowpath (which would not be good), but this DNS traffic could end up in the slowpath anyway if some other condition is present requiring it.&amp;nbsp; Unlikely that enabling this feature would cause any noticeable performance impact in my opinion.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:24:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/performance-impact-of-sk34295-How-to-configure-DNS-NAT/m-p/211631#M40135</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-17T15:24:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: performance impact of sk34295 (How to configure DNS NAT) ?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/performance-impact-of-sk34295-How-to-configure-DNS-NAT/m-p/211640#M40139</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I cant speak for others, but TAC had customer follow this back in 2020 and they never had any issues afterwards.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 16:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/performance-impact-of-sk34295-How-to-configure-DNS-NAT/m-p/211640#M40139</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-17T16:37:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

