<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: High memory utilisation on Threat Emulation box in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211340#M40059</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Recommend upgrading to JHF T53 and monitoring.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There were some memory leaks addressed between these takes that may apply depending on exactly how the TE appliance is deployed.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 23:45:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-04-15T23:45:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>High memory utilisation on Threat Emulation box</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211243#M40019</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi team&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Need some guidance with high memory utilisation of one of our TE appliance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Details of the TE appliance:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Platform: TT-10-00&lt;BR /&gt;Model: Check Point TE100X&lt;BR /&gt;CPU Model: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590S CPU&lt;BR /&gt;CPU Frequency: 2993.124 Mhz&lt;BR /&gt;Number of Cores: 4&lt;BR /&gt;CPU Hyperthreading: Disabled&lt;BR /&gt;Number of line cards: 1&lt;BR /&gt;Line card 1 model: **bleep**-51040-090&lt;BR /&gt;Line card 1 type: 4 ports 1GbE Copper&lt;BR /&gt;Number of disks: 1&lt;BR /&gt;Disk 1 Model: xxxx&lt;BR /&gt;Disk 1 Capacity: 1.00 TB&lt;BR /&gt;Total Disks size: 1.00 TB&lt;BR /&gt;Total Memory: 16384 MB&lt;BR /&gt;Memory Slot 1 Size: 8192 MB&lt;BR /&gt;Memory Slot 2 Size: 8192 MB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The box is on H&lt;STRONG&gt;OTFIX_R81_20_JUMBO_HF_MAIN Take: 41&lt;/STRONG&gt; and doesn't have many connections (Peak connections range upto 30)&lt;BR /&gt;ID | Active | CPU | Connections | Peak&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;0 | Yes | 3 | 5 | 28&lt;BR /&gt;1 | Yes | 2 | 7 | 30&lt;BR /&gt;2 | Yes | 1 | 5 | 31&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reviewing the &lt;STRONG&gt;top&lt;/STRONG&gt; command output with memory sorted I can see lots of memory being consumed by the process gunicorn&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tasks: 326 total, 2 running, 324 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie&lt;BR /&gt;%Cpu(s): 1.4 us, 0.4 sy, 0.0 ni, 98.1 id, 0.0 wa, 0.1 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st&lt;BR /&gt;KiB Mem : 16067604 total, 1906020 free, 10656116 used, 3505468 buff/cache&lt;BR /&gt;KiB Swap: 17277900 total, 17231556 free, 46344 used. 4613200 avail Mem&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND&lt;BR /&gt;26689 nobody 20 0 1155900 628800 2744 S 0.0 3.9 1:19.67 python3&lt;BR /&gt;27760 admin 20 0 616240 407728 2028 S 0.0 2.5 4:11.65 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;20443 nobody 20 0 616496 407356 1652 S 0.0 2.5 0:00.13 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;20444 nobody 20 0 616496 407356 1652 S 0.0 2.5 0:00.13 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;20445 nobody 20 0 616496 407356 1652 S 0.0 2.5 0:00.13 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;20446 nobody 20 0 616496 407356 1652 S 0.0 2.5 0:00.13 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;20447 nobody 20 0 616496 407356 1652 S 0.0 2.5 0:00.13 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;20918 nobody 20 0 616240 406380 1656 S 0.0 2.5 0:00.22 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;20914 nobody 20 0 616240 406308 1596 S 0.0 2.5 0:00.21 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;20915 nobody 20 0 616240 406308 1596 S 0.0 2.5 0:00.22 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;20916 nobody 20 0 616240 406300 1588 S 0.0 2.5 0:00.22 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;20917 nobody 20 0 616240 406300 1588 S 0.0 2.5 0:00.22 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;15012 nobody 20 0 616240 405368 1656 S 0.0 2.5 0:00.31 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;15009 nobody 20 0 616240 405320 1616 S 0.0 2.5 0:00.31 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;15010 nobody 20 0 616240 405308 1604 S 0.0 2.5 0:00.31 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;15013 nobody 20 0 616240 405308 1604 S 0.0 2.5 0:00.31 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;15011 nobody 20 0 616240 405304 1600 S 0.0 2.5 0:00.31 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;19764 nobody 20 0 616108 404964 1632 S 0.0 2.5 0:01.22 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;19737 nobody 20 0 616108 404956 1624 S 0.0 2.5 0:01.20 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;19740 nobody 20 0 616108 404952 1620 S 0.0 2.5 0:01.21 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;19753 nobody 20 0 616108 404952 1620 S 0.0 2.5 0:01.22 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;19757 nobody 20 0 616108 404952 1620 S 0.0 2.5 0:01.21 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;27266 nobody 20 0 616108 404068 1644 S 0.0 2.5 0:01.30 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;27267 nobody 20 0 616108 404068 1644 S 0.0 2.5 0:01.31 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;27268 nobody 20 0 616108 404068 1644 S 0.0 2.5 0:01.30 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;27269 nobody 20 0 616108 404068 1644 S 0.0 2.5 0:01.32 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;27270 nobody 20 0 616108 404068 1644 S 0.0 2.5 0:01.30 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;10685 nobody 20 0 615852 403416 1652 S 0.0 2.5 0:01.56 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;10687 nobody 20 0 615852 403416 1648 S 0.0 2.5 0:01.57 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;10688 nobody 20 0 615852 403416 1648 S 0.0 2.5 0:01.59 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;10684 nobody 20 0 615852 403412 1648 S 0.0 2.5 0:01.57 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;10686 nobody 20 0 615852 403412 1648 S 0.0 2.5 0:01.57 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;18659 nobody 20 0 551736 398848 1872 S 0.0 2.5 0:01.68 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;18660 nobody 20 0 550316 397828 1652 S 0.0 2.5 0:01.66 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;18661 nobody 20 0 550316 397828 1652 S 0.0 2.5 0:01.65 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;18662 nobody 20 0 550316 397828 1652 S 0.0 2.5 0:01.66 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;18663 nobody 20 0 550316 397828 1652 S 0.0 2.5 0:01.67 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;7697 nobody 20 0 550316 389884 1652 S 0.0 2.4 0:01.72 gunicorn&lt;BR /&gt;.........................................................................................................................&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;The swap memory is being used aswell:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; total&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; used&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;free&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;shared buff/cache available&lt;BR /&gt;Mem: 15691&amp;nbsp; 10405&amp;nbsp; 1861&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 17&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 3423&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;4505&lt;BR /&gt;Swap: 16872&amp;nbsp; 45&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;16827&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Output of ps -auxw is as below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PID TTY TIME CMD&lt;BR /&gt;14029 pts/2 00:00:00 ps&lt;BR /&gt;28687 ? 00:00:00 sshd&lt;BR /&gt;28693 pts/2 00:00:00 shell_wrapper.s&lt;BR /&gt;28702 pts/2 00:00:00 sudo&lt;BR /&gt;28703 pts/2 00:00:00 bash&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Output of cpwd_admin list&amp;nbsp;is as below:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;APP PID STAT #START START_TIME MON COMMAND&lt;BR /&gt;CPVIEWD 13961 E 1 [10:35:09] 3/4/2024 N cpviewd&lt;BR /&gt;OTLPAGENT 14021 E 1 [10:35:09] 3/4/2024 N cpview_exporter&lt;BR /&gt;CPVIEWS 14028 E 1 [10:35:09] 3/4/2024 N cpview_services&lt;BR /&gt;CVIEWAPIS 20712 E 1 [10:44:13] 3/4/2024 N cpview_api_service&lt;BR /&gt;SXL_STATD 14036 E 1 [10:35:09] 3/4/2024 N sxl_statd&lt;BR /&gt;MSGD 14044 E 1 [10:35:09] 3/4/2024 Y msgd&lt;BR /&gt;CPD 14050 E 1 [10:35:09] 3/4/2024 Y cpd&lt;BR /&gt;MPDAEMON 14061 E 1 [10:35:09] 3/4/2024 N mpdaemon /opt/CPshrd-R81.20/log/mpdaemon.elg /opt/CPshrd-R81.20/conf/mpdaemon.conf&lt;BR /&gt;TP_CONF_SERVICE 14087 E 1 [10:35:09] 3/4/2024 N tp_conf_service --conf=tp_conf.json --log=error&lt;BR /&gt;CI_CLEANUP 14314 E 1 [10:35:14] 3/4/2024 N avi_del_tmp_files&lt;BR /&gt;CIHS 14316 E 1 [10:35:14] 3/4/2024 N ci_http_server -j -f /opt/CPsuite-R81.20/fw1/conf/cihs.conf&lt;BR /&gt;FWD 14325 E 1 [10:35:14] 3/4/2024 N fwd&lt;BR /&gt;SPIKE_DETECTIVE 20713 E 1 [10:44:13] 3/4/2024 N spike_detective&lt;BR /&gt;RAD 14902 E 1 [10:35:20] 3/4/2024 N rad&lt;BR /&gt;DLPU_0 16393 E 1 [10:35:35] 3/4/2024 Y dlpu -i4 0 1 -i6 -1 -1&lt;BR /&gt;DLPU_1 16400 E 1 [10:35:35] 3/4/2024 Y dlpu -i4 2 2 -i6 -1 -1&lt;BR /&gt;RTMD 26637 E 1 [10:37:31] 3/4/2024 N rtmd&lt;BR /&gt;DASERVICE 26832 E 1 [10:37:32] 3/4/2024 N DAService_script&lt;BR /&gt;AUTOUPDATER 26855 E 1 [10:37:32] 3/4/2024 N AutoUpdaterService.sh&lt;BR /&gt;LPD 14363 E 1 [10:39:32] 3/4/2024 N lpd&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;enabled_blades are as below:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;fw av ThreatEmulation mon Scrub&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Output of meminfo:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MemTotal: 16067604 kB&lt;BR /&gt;MemFree: 1902576 kB&lt;BR /&gt;MemAvailable: 4610896 kB&lt;BR /&gt;Buffers: 384640 kB&lt;BR /&gt;Cached: 2539212 kB&lt;BR /&gt;SwapCached: 4260 kB&lt;BR /&gt;Active: 8548532 kB&lt;BR /&gt;Inactive: 2595080 kB&lt;BR /&gt;Active(anon): 6929856 kB&lt;BR /&gt;Inactive(anon): 1307652 kB&lt;BR /&gt;Active(file): 1618676 kB&lt;BR /&gt;Inactive(file): 1287428 kB&lt;BR /&gt;Unevictable: 152 kB&lt;BR /&gt;Mlocked: 16 kB&lt;BR /&gt;SwapTotal: 17277900 kB&lt;BR /&gt;SwapFree: 17231556 kB&lt;BR /&gt;Dirty: 144 kB&lt;BR /&gt;Writeback: 0 kB&lt;BR /&gt;AnonPages: 8215948 kB&lt;BR /&gt;Mapped: 122492 kB&lt;BR /&gt;Shmem: 17840 kB&lt;BR /&gt;Slab: 582576 kB&lt;BR /&gt;SReclaimable: 408752 kB&lt;BR /&gt;SUnreclaim: 173824 kB&lt;BR /&gt;KernelStack: 11696 kB&lt;BR /&gt;PageTables: 92324 kB&lt;BR /&gt;NFS_Unstable: 0 kB&lt;BR /&gt;Bounce: 0 kB&lt;BR /&gt;WritebackTmp: 0 kB&lt;BR /&gt;CommitLimit: 25311700 kB&lt;BR /&gt;Committed_AS: 10596024 kB&lt;BR /&gt;VmallocTotal: 34359738367 kB&lt;BR /&gt;VmallocUsed: 2067964 kB&lt;BR /&gt;VmallocChunk: 34357551444 kB&lt;BR /&gt;Percpu: 704 kB&lt;BR /&gt;AnonHugePages: 1366016 kB&lt;BR /&gt;HugePages_Total: 0&lt;BR /&gt;HugePages_Free: 0&lt;BR /&gt;HugePages_Rsvd: 0&lt;BR /&gt;HugePages_Surp: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Hugepagesize: 2048 kB&lt;BR /&gt;DirectMap4k: 557976 kB&lt;BR /&gt;DirectMap2M: 16109568 kB&lt;BR /&gt;DirectMap1G: 0 kB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Output of&amp;nbsp;cpstat fw -f all:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Product name: Firewall&lt;BR /&gt;Major version: 9&lt;BR /&gt;Minor version: 9&lt;BR /&gt;Kernel build num.: xxx&lt;BR /&gt;Policy name:xxxxxxxxxxxx&lt;BR /&gt;Policy install time: Fri Apr 12 20:11:38 2024&lt;BR /&gt;Num. connections: 11&lt;BR /&gt;Peak num. connections: 533&lt;BR /&gt;Connections capacity limit: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Total accepted packets: 91134456&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Interface table&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;|Name |Dir|Accept |Drop|Reject|Log |&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;|Mgmt |in | 5218781|2900| 0| 7356|&lt;BR /&gt;|Mgmt |out|83840391| 0| 0| 1334|&lt;BR /&gt;|bond1 |in | 0| 0| 0| 0|&lt;BR /&gt;|bond1 |out| 0| 0| 0| 0|&lt;BR /&gt;|bond1.xxxx|in | 1159509| 459| 0| 284|&lt;BR /&gt;|bond1.xxxx|out| 915775| 44| 0| 8737|&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;| | |91134456|3403| 0|17711|&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interface table (64-bit)&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;|Name |Dir|Accept |Drop|Reject|Log |&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;|Mgmt |in | 5218781|2900| 0| 7356|&lt;BR /&gt;|Mgmt |out|83840391| 0| 0| 1334|&lt;BR /&gt;|bond1 |in | 0| 0| 0| 0|&lt;BR /&gt;|bond1 |out| 0| 0| 0| 0|&lt;BR /&gt;|bond1.xx|in | 1159509| 459| 0| 284|&lt;BR /&gt;|bond1.xxx|out| 915775| 44| 0| 8737|&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;| | |91134456|3403| 0|17711|&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ISP link table&lt;BR /&gt;------------------&lt;BR /&gt;|Name|Status|Role|&lt;BR /&gt;------------------&lt;BR /&gt;------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hmem - block size: 4096&lt;BR /&gt;hmem - requested bytes: 1233125376&lt;BR /&gt;hmem - initial allocated bytes: 1233125376&lt;BR /&gt;hmem - initial allocated blocks: 0&lt;BR /&gt;hmem - initial allocated pools: 0&lt;BR /&gt;hmem - current allocated bytes: 1233125376&lt;BR /&gt;hmem - current allocated blocks: 301056&lt;BR /&gt;hmem - current allocated pools: 1&lt;BR /&gt;hmem - maximum bytes: 1281359872&lt;BR /&gt;hmem - maximum pools: 512&lt;BR /&gt;hmem - bytes used: 0&lt;BR /&gt;hmem - blocks used: 0&lt;BR /&gt;hmem - bytes unused: 1233125376&lt;BR /&gt;hmem - blocks unused: 301056&lt;BR /&gt;hmem - bytes peak: 218223496&lt;BR /&gt;hmem - blocks peak: 55811&lt;BR /&gt;hmem - bytes internal use: 0&lt;BR /&gt;hmem - number of items: 0&lt;BR /&gt;hmem - alloc operations: 245917421&lt;BR /&gt;hmem - free operations: 243930260&lt;BR /&gt;hmem - failed alloc: 0&lt;BR /&gt;hmem - failed free: 0&lt;BR /&gt;kmem - system physical mem: 0&lt;BR /&gt;kmem - available physical mem: 0&lt;BR /&gt;kmem - aix heap size: 0&lt;BR /&gt;kmem - bytes used: 1695331560&lt;BR /&gt;kmem - blocking bytes used: 9851712&lt;BR /&gt;kmem - non blocking bytes used: 1685479848&lt;BR /&gt;kmem - bytes unused: 0&lt;BR /&gt;kmem - bytes peak: 1741700516&lt;BR /&gt;kmem - blocking bytes peak: 9941124&lt;BR /&gt;kmem - non blocking bytes peak: 1731759392&lt;BR /&gt;kmem - bytes internal use: 108112&lt;BR /&gt;kmem - number of items: 6757&lt;BR /&gt;kmem - alloc operations: 1675154&lt;BR /&gt;kmem - free operations: 1668397&lt;BR /&gt;kmem - failed alloc: 0&lt;BR /&gt;kmem - failed free: 0&lt;BR /&gt;inspect - packets: 0&lt;BR /&gt;inspect - operations: 0&lt;BR /&gt;inspect - lookups: 0&lt;BR /&gt;inspect - record: 0&lt;BR /&gt;inspect - extract: 0&lt;BR /&gt;cookies - total: 371979711&lt;BR /&gt;cookies - alloc: 0&lt;BR /&gt;cookies - free: 0&lt;BR /&gt;cookies - dup: 332666019&lt;BR /&gt;cookies - get: 1129273158&lt;BR /&gt;cookies - put: 363541903&lt;BR /&gt;cookies - len: 743931873&lt;BR /&gt;chains - alloc: 0&lt;BR /&gt;chains - free: 0&lt;BR /&gt;fragments - fragments: 2&lt;BR /&gt;fragments - expired: 0&lt;BR /&gt;fragments - packets: 1&lt;BR /&gt;ufp - % hits ratio: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ufp - total connections: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ufp - hits connections: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ufp - session max: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ufp - session current: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ufp - session count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ufp - rej session : 0&lt;BR /&gt;ufp - time stamp:&lt;BR /&gt;ufp - is alive: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - pid: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - proto: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - port: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - logical port: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - max avail socket: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - socket in use max: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - socket in use current: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - socket in use count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - session max: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - session current: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - session count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - auth session max: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - auth session current: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - auth session count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - accepted session: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - rejected session: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - auth failures: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - opsec cvp session max: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - opsec cvp session current: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - opsec cvp session count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - opsec cvp rej session : 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - ssl encryp session max: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - ssl encryp session current: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - ssl encryp session count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - transparent session max: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - transparent session current: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - transparent session count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - proxied session max: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - proxied session current: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - proxied session count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - tunneled session max: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - tunneled session current: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - tunneled session count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - ftp session max: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - ftp session current: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - ftp session count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;http - time stamp:&lt;BR /&gt;http - is alive: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ftp - pid: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ftp - proto: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ftp - port: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ftp - logical port: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ftp - max avail socket: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ftp - socket in use max: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ftp - socket in use current: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ftp - socket in use count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ftp - session max: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ftp - session current: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ftp - session count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ftp - auth session max: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ftp - auth session current: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ftp - auth session count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ftp - accepted session: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ftp - rejected session: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ftp - auth failures: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ftp - opsec cvp session max: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ftp - opsec cvp session current: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ftp - opsec cvp session count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;ftp - opsec cvp rej session : 0&lt;BR /&gt;ftp - time stamp:&lt;BR /&gt;ftp - is alive: 0&lt;BR /&gt;telnet - pid: 0&lt;BR /&gt;telnet - proto: 0&lt;BR /&gt;telnet - port: 0&lt;BR /&gt;telnet - logical port: 0&lt;BR /&gt;telnet - max avail socket: 0&lt;BR /&gt;telnet - socket in use max: 0&lt;BR /&gt;telnet - socket in use current: 0&lt;BR /&gt;telnet - socket in use count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;telnet - session max: 0&lt;BR /&gt;telnet - session current: 0&lt;BR /&gt;telnet - session count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;telnet - auth session max: 0&lt;BR /&gt;telnet - auth session current: 0&lt;BR /&gt;telnet - auth session count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;telnet - accepted session: 0&lt;BR /&gt;telnet - rejected session: 0&lt;BR /&gt;telnet - auth failures: 0&lt;BR /&gt;telnet - time stamp:&lt;BR /&gt;telnet - is alive: 0&lt;BR /&gt;rlogin - pid: 0&lt;BR /&gt;rlogin - proto: 0&lt;BR /&gt;rlogin - port: 0&lt;BR /&gt;rlogin - logical port: 0&lt;BR /&gt;rlogin - max avail socket: 0&lt;BR /&gt;rlogin - socket in use max: 0&lt;BR /&gt;rlogin - socket in use current: 0&lt;BR /&gt;rlogin - socket in use count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;rlogin - session max: 0&lt;BR /&gt;rlogin - session current: 0&lt;BR /&gt;rlogin - session count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;rlogin - auth session max: 0&lt;BR /&gt;rlogin - auth session current: 0&lt;BR /&gt;rlogin - auth session count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;rlogin - accepted session: 0&lt;BR /&gt;rlogin - rejected session: 0&lt;BR /&gt;rlogin - auth failures: 0&lt;BR /&gt;rlogin - time stamp:&lt;BR /&gt;rlogin - is alive: 0&lt;BR /&gt;smtp - pid: 0&lt;BR /&gt;smtp - proto: 0&lt;BR /&gt;smtp - port: 0&lt;BR /&gt;smtp - logical port: 0&lt;BR /&gt;smtp - max avail socket: 0&lt;BR /&gt;smtp - socket in use max: 0&lt;BR /&gt;smtp - socket in use current: 0&lt;BR /&gt;smtp - socket in use count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;smtp - session max: 0&lt;BR /&gt;smtp - session current: 0&lt;BR /&gt;smtp - session count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;smtp - accepted session: 0&lt;BR /&gt;smtp - rejected session: 0&lt;BR /&gt;smtp - mail max: 0&lt;BR /&gt;smtp - mail curr: 0&lt;BR /&gt;smtp - mail count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;smtp - outgoing mail max: 0&lt;BR /&gt;smtp - outgoing mail curr: 0&lt;BR /&gt;smtp - outgoing mail count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;smtp - max mail on conn: 0&lt;BR /&gt;smtp - total mails : 0&lt;BR /&gt;smtp - time stamp: Sat Apr 13 08:11:40 2024&lt;BR /&gt;smtp - is alive: 0&lt;BR /&gt;sync - configured: No&lt;BR /&gt;sync - out state: Off&lt;BR /&gt;sync - in state: Off&lt;BR /&gt;sync - number of sent packets: 0&lt;BR /&gt;sync - number of Kbytes sent: 0&lt;BR /&gt;sync - number of packets received: 0&lt;BR /&gt;sync - number of Kbytes received: 0&lt;BR /&gt;sync - number of retrans requests sent: 0&lt;BR /&gt;sync - number of retrans requests received: 0&lt;BR /&gt;sync - number of ack packets sent: 0&lt;BR /&gt;sync - number of ack packets received: 0&lt;BR /&gt;sync - number of packets dropped by network: 0&lt;BR /&gt;sync - overall number of table updates to be synced: 152488&lt;BR /&gt;sync - number of updates filtered by 'non sync': 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have restarted the box once which helped to resolve the memory utilisation however it has now gone back up to 80% and its constantly increasing&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anything you recommend for me to try to resolve this high memory utilisation please?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 03:09:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211243#M40019</guid>
      <dc:creator>salil_arora</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-15T03:09:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High memory utilisation on Threat Emulation box</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211299#M40043</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Are there any actual symptoms of high memory usage (like performance/functionality degradation)?&lt;BR /&gt;If you think you have a memory leak, use this SK to diagnose where and engage with TAC:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk35496" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk35496&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, what you're describing is normal behavior.&lt;BR /&gt;"free" only shows you what has been allocated thus far, which will normally decrease and not increase.&lt;BR /&gt;This is normal.&lt;BR /&gt;"buff/cache" shows you what memory is allocated for other things but could easily be freed up if necessary.&lt;BR /&gt;This will fluctuate.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If both of these things are near their maximum, then swap will be utilized.&lt;BR /&gt;For gateways passing production traffic, swap should not be used or you'll likely start experiencing performance-related issues.&lt;BR /&gt;Threat Emulation appliances aren't inline, so swap is less problematic here, but the usage is minimal.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211299#M40043</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-15T15:22:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High memory utilisation on Threat Emulation box</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211328#M40052</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't see an issue. Unless you have memory leak as stated by PhoneBoy. If there is no memory leak then it is OK.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Linux systems uses all the memory it can or most of it. The trick is to monitor swap. But in this case it is to low to even consider to be worried.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 20:01:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211328#M40052</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lesley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-15T20:01:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High memory utilisation on Threat Emulation box</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211336#M40055</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi mate&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for your reply&lt;BR /&gt;There are currently no symptoms yet as I restarted the TE appliance when the memory went as high as 86% and since the restart the memory started going up from 50% all the way upto 80% now and it is still increasing. With this trend the memory will keep increasing hence I wanted to do something about it before there is a real impact&lt;BR /&gt;I will have a look at the memory leak article and see if I can spot something&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 21:42:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211336#M40055</guid>
      <dc:creator>salil_arora</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-15T21:42:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High memory utilisation on Threat Emulation box</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211337#M40056</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi mate&lt;BR /&gt;There is not an issue now however there can be as the memory keeps increasing day by day.&lt;BR /&gt;I will have a look at the memory leak article&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for your input&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 21:44:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211337#M40056</guid>
      <dc:creator>salil_arora</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-15T21:44:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High memory utilisation on Threat Emulation box</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211338#M40057</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You are fine, ignore what "free" is reporting (1.8GB) and focus on what "available" is reporting (4.5GB), which is a more accurate representation of how much memory is really available.&amp;nbsp; Transient conditions such as policy installations can cause high memory utilization which may cause the system to temporarily dip into swap space.&amp;nbsp; However it never frees that swap space until reboot.&amp;nbsp; Please see my &lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Member-Exclusive-Content/Be-your-own-TAC-Advanced-Gateway-Troubleshooting-Commands/m-p/208378" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Be your Own TAC&lt;/A&gt; speech from CPX Vegas where I discussed how to properly assess the amount of memory available on a system.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 22:30:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211338#M40057</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-15T22:30:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High memory utilisation on Threat Emulation box</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211339#M40058</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you so much Timothy for your update,the available memory has gone down to 4GB now&lt;BR /&gt;Will look into your CPX speech now and see if I can diagnose further&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 22:45:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211339#M40058</guid>
      <dc:creator>salil_arora</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-15T22:45:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High memory utilisation on Threat Emulation box</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211340#M40059</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Recommend upgrading to JHF T53 and monitoring.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There were some memory leaks addressed between these takes that may apply depending on exactly how the TE appliance is deployed.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 23:45:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211340#M40059</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-15T23:45:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High memory utilisation on Threat Emulation box</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211350#M40060</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Chris for your input and suggestion. The funny thing is we have multiple TE 's with same Take(T43) and only one TE appliance out of the 4 is facing the memory issue. Looking into this further I see this also:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[Expert@xxxxxxxxxxx:0]# ps -ef |grep "ifi"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;nobody 3481 27708 0 Apr10 ? 00:00:43 /var/log/py/python3_64 /var/log/py/rpi/gunicorn/gunicorn --config /var/log/py/rpmi/server_conf/ifi_server_config.py&lt;BR /&gt;admin 8104 13212 0 14:08 pts/2 00:00:00 grep --color=auto ifi&lt;BR /&gt;admin 27708 25467 0 Apr03 ? 00:00:53 /var/log/py/python3_64 /var/log/py/rpi/gunicorn/gunicorn --config /var/log/py/rpmi/server_conf/ifi_server_config.py&lt;BR /&gt;admin 28343 1 0 Apr03 ? 00:00:00 /tmp/ifiPython3 /tmp/ifi_server restart&lt;BR /&gt;admin 28347 28343 0 Apr03 ? 00:00:55 /tmp/ifiPython3 /tmp/ifi_server restart&lt;BR /&gt;admin 28348 28343 0 Apr03 ? 00:00:56 /tmp/ifiPython3 /tmp/ifi_server restart&lt;BR /&gt;admin 28349 28343 0 Apr03 ? 00:00:53 /tmp/ifiPython3 /tmp/ifi_server restart&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reading the release note of Take 43 I see its a known issue:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE cellspacing="0"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD width="92.9792px"&gt;&lt;P&gt;PRJ-46118,&lt;BR /&gt;PMTR-91889&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="122.969px"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Threat Emulation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="698.719px"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Multiple&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;ifiPython3&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;processes may utilize the Security Gateway memory, affecting the Anti-Virus blade performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can you please confirm if the above has been fixed with T53?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Appreciate your help in advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 02:12:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211350#M40060</guid>
      <dc:creator>salil_arora</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-16T02:12:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High memory utilisation on Threat Emulation box</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211357#M40062</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Are all the TE appliances the same model or different...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Confirmed. Whilst there are rare exceptions, T53 will include fixes of the previous takes as a rule.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 04:51:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211357#M40062</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-16T04:51:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High memory utilisation on Threat Emulation box</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211513#M40096</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the confirmation Chris,appreciate it&lt;BR /&gt;Yes correct we have a mixture of 1000X and 2000X TE&lt;BR /&gt;Will go ahead and upgrade the TE to Take 53 as per your recommendation&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 23:18:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211513#M40096</guid>
      <dc:creator>salil_arora</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-16T23:18:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High memory utilisation on Threat Emulation box</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211514#M40097</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The different models&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;would have significantly more memory available and potentially a greater ability to endure any leak for longer as a result - assuming one exists.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Work with TAC if you need to put some science to it, there is a procedure (SK) to trace potential leaks otherwise&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 23:32:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211514#M40097</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-16T23:32:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High memory utilisation on Threat Emulation box</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211519#M40100</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yeah that makes sense thanks Chris&lt;BR /&gt;Yes will do if after upgrading the TE to Take 53 if I face the same symptom(hopefully not)&lt;BR /&gt;I will then follow the steps on&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk35496" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;sk35496&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks again for your help&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 01:21:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/High-memory-utilisation-on-Threat-Emulation-box/m-p/211519#M40100</guid>
      <dc:creator>salil_arora</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-17T01:21:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

