<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Missmatched GW name in VTI and GW object in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Missmatched-GW-name-in-VTI-and-GW-object/m-p/210590#M39896</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The peer name in VTI needs to match the smartconsole gw object name&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2024 09:09:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AmirArama</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-04-06T09:09:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Missmatched GW name in VTI and GW object</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Missmatched-GW-name-in-VTI-and-GW-object/m-p/210588#M39895</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi we have a problem with IPSEC VPN s2s. Let's say there are 2 GWs named LocalGW (our site) and RemoteGW (remote site).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We on out local site created object of remote GW called "Remote_GW" and created a VTI with GW peer name "&lt;STRONG&gt;RemoteGW&lt;/STRONG&gt;" (difference in underscore _ ) thus the packets are being dropped with error message "&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;According to the policy the packet should not have been decrypted". My question is, does it suffice if we just rename the VTI to the name "&lt;STRONG&gt;Remote_GW&lt;/STRONG&gt;" or does object name and VTI peer GW name also need to match a real remote GW name (RemoteGW) ???&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2024 05:56:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Missmatched-GW-name-in-VTI-and-GW-object/m-p/210588#M39895</guid>
      <dc:creator>adamec</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-06T05:56:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Missmatched GW name in VTI and GW object</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Missmatched-GW-name-in-VTI-and-GW-object/m-p/210590#M39896</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The peer name in VTI needs to match the smartconsole gw object name&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2024 09:09:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Missmatched-GW-name-in-VTI-and-GW-object/m-p/210590#M39896</guid>
      <dc:creator>AmirArama</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-06T09:09:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Missmatched GW name in VTI and GW object</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Missmatched-GW-name-in-VTI-and-GW-object/m-p/210599#M39898</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/86692"&gt;@AmirArama&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;said, it HAS TO match, exactly, so if character is missing, it will never work, period.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2024 13:28:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Missmatched-GW-name-in-VTI-and-GW-object/m-p/210599#M39898</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-06T13:28:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

