<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: performance impact of adding XFF header in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/performance-impact-of-adding-XFF-header/m-p/208683#M39508</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;At minimum you need to activate APCL/URLF and HTTPS Inspection as all HTTP Headers are encrypted.&lt;BR /&gt;Not sure what the performance impact is above and beyond that.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:22:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-03-13T15:22:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>performance impact of adding XFF header</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/performance-impact-of-adding-XFF-header/m-p/208312#M39441</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Following&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk167578" target="_blank"&gt;XFF Header injection over source NATed HTTP/S connections (checkpoint.com)&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;we can add XFF-header to every http request.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any experience out there which performance impact has this feature ? I've a feeling that changing every http/https-request needs a lot.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I think to add the XFF-header to a HTTPS-request full HTTPS inspection is needed. From the requirements in sk167578 "&lt;SPAN&gt;For HTTPS traffic: Enable HTTPS inspection on the relevant connections.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;"&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;But I'm not sure if the XFF-header is part of the whole encrypted HTTP-request-header or maybe readable unencrypted ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 12:42:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/performance-impact-of-adding-XFF-header/m-p/208312#M39441</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-11T12:42:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: performance impact of adding XFF header</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/performance-impact-of-adding-XFF-header/m-p/208683#M39508</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;At minimum you need to activate APCL/URLF and HTTPS Inspection as all HTTP Headers are encrypted.&lt;BR /&gt;Not sure what the performance impact is above and beyond that.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:22:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/performance-impact-of-adding-XFF-header/m-p/208683#M39508</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-13T15:22:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

