<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: no rx_missed_errors counter in i40e interface? in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/no-rx-missed-errors-counter-in-i40e-interface/m-p/199766#M37464</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Looks like it is rx_dropped, assuming all of those are legit ring buffer drops the overall drop rate is a miniscule 0.0033% which is well beyond the 0.1% target.&amp;nbsp; You can use &lt;STRONG&gt;sar -n EDEV&lt;/STRONG&gt; if you are curious to see if these increments are happening constantly or in clumps.&amp;nbsp; If RX-DRPs are incrementing slowly and constantly that generally means it is trash traffic, but this trash traffic normally does not increment any counters under &lt;STRONG&gt;ethtool -S&lt;/STRONG&gt; at all.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Does the RX-DRP value shown by &lt;STRONG&gt;netstat -ni&lt;/STRONG&gt; exactly follow rx-dropped?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 14:51:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-12-05T14:51:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>no rx_missed_errors counter in i40e interface?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/no-rx-missed-errors-counter-in-i40e-interface/m-p/199705#M37450</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I tried to analyse our system (16200, R80.40) for RX-DROPs. Timothy suggested in "Check Point Firewall&lt;BR /&gt;Performance Optimization" book to take a look for&amp;nbsp;rx_missed_errors in "ethtool -S &amp;lt;interface&amp;gt;".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On a i40e we don't have a counter for rx_missed_errors. On igb interfaces it's available on the same system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can I verify that&amp;nbsp;a ring buffer slot was not available to receive a frame on a i40e interface?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 08:11:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/no-rx-missed-errors-counter-in-i40e-interface/m-p/199705#M37450</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-05T08:11:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: no rx_missed_errors counter in i40e interface?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/no-rx-missed-errors-counter-in-i40e-interface/m-p/199738#M37459</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The relevant counter probably has something like "fifo" or even "buffer" (maybe rx_out_of_buffer?) in it, but this varies wildly for every driver.&amp;nbsp; Please post the output of ethtool -S for the relevant interface and I should be able to find it.&amp;nbsp; Keep in mind though that starting in Gaia 3.10 not every RX-DRP is necessarily a buffering miss, and could instead be "trash traffic" such as unknown EtherTypes and invalid VLAN tags.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk166424" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;sk166424: Number of RX packet drops on interfaces increases on a Security Gateway R80.30 and higher with Gaia kernel 3.10&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 12:55:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/no-rx-missed-errors-counter-in-i40e-interface/m-p/199738#M37459</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-05T12:55:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: no rx_missed_errors counter in i40e interface?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/no-rx-missed-errors-counter-in-i40e-interface/m-p/199749#M37460</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your answer. I attached ethtool -S. Looks like it's&amp;nbsp;rx_dropped but with a gap between ip link show and ethtool....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="javascript"&gt;# ip -s link show eth2-03 ; ethtool -S eth2-03 |grep rx_dropped
18: eth2-03: &amp;lt;BROADCAST,MULTICAST,SLAVE,UP,LOWER_UP&amp;gt; mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master bond2 state UP mode DEFAULT qlen 1000
    link/ether de:ad:be:ef:de:ad brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    RX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped overrun mcast
    5483651403100933 7555221204989 39      250173841 0       4169914178
    TX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped carrier collsns
    5322039635704921 6727811742195 0       0       0       0
     rx_dropped: 248075911&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 13:44:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/no-rx-missed-errors-counter-in-i40e-interface/m-p/199749#M37460</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-05T13:44:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: no rx_missed_errors counter in i40e interface?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/no-rx-missed-errors-counter-in-i40e-interface/m-p/199766#M37464</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Looks like it is rx_dropped, assuming all of those are legit ring buffer drops the overall drop rate is a miniscule 0.0033% which is well beyond the 0.1% target.&amp;nbsp; You can use &lt;STRONG&gt;sar -n EDEV&lt;/STRONG&gt; if you are curious to see if these increments are happening constantly or in clumps.&amp;nbsp; If RX-DRPs are incrementing slowly and constantly that generally means it is trash traffic, but this trash traffic normally does not increment any counters under &lt;STRONG&gt;ethtool -S&lt;/STRONG&gt; at all.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Does the RX-DRP value shown by &lt;STRONG&gt;netstat -ni&lt;/STRONG&gt; exactly follow rx-dropped?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 14:51:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/no-rx-missed-errors-counter-in-i40e-interface/m-p/199766#M37464</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-05T14:51:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: no rx_missed_errors counter in i40e interface?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/no-rx-missed-errors-counter-in-i40e-interface/m-p/199938#M37504</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/597"&gt;@Timothy_Hall&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does the RX-DRP value shown by &lt;STRONG&gt;netstat -ni&lt;/STRONG&gt; exactly follow rx-dropped?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looks like it different.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tested quick and dirty with&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;# while :; do date; netstat -ni | grep eth2-03 | awk '{print $6 " netstat -ni"}'; ethtool -S eth2-03 |grep -E '[^.]rx_dropped' | awk '{ print $2 " ethtool -S"}'; sleep 1; done&lt;BR /&gt;Thu Dec 7 08:04:19 CET 2023&lt;BR /&gt;250233343 netstat -ni&lt;BR /&gt;248130440 ethtool -S&lt;BR /&gt;Thu Dec 7 08:04:20 CET 2023&lt;BR /&gt;250233343 netstat -ni&lt;BR /&gt;248130440 ethtool -S&lt;BR /&gt;Thu Dec 7 08:04:21 CET 2023&lt;BR /&gt;250233343 netstat -ni&lt;BR /&gt;248130440 ethtool -S&lt;BR /&gt;Thu Dec 7 08:04:22 CET 2023&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;250233344&lt;/STRONG&gt; netstat -ni&lt;BR /&gt;248130440 ethtool -S&lt;BR /&gt;Thu Dec 7 08:04:23 CET 2023&lt;BR /&gt;250233344 netstat -ni&lt;BR /&gt;248130440 ethtool -S&lt;BR /&gt;Thu Dec 7 08:04:24 CET 2023&lt;BR /&gt;250233344 netstat -ni&lt;BR /&gt;248130440 ethtool -S&lt;BR /&gt;Thu Dec 7 08:04:25 CET 2023&lt;BR /&gt;250233344 netstat -ni&lt;BR /&gt;248130440 ethtool -S&lt;BR /&gt;Thu Dec 7 08:04:26 CET 2023&lt;BR /&gt;250233344 netstat -ni&lt;BR /&gt;248130440 ethtool -S&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2023 07:08:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/no-rx-missed-errors-counter-in-i40e-interface/m-p/199938#M37504</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-07T07:08:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: no rx_missed_errors counter in i40e interface?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/no-rx-missed-errors-counter-in-i40e-interface/m-p/199965#M37506</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Right, for your outputs I would interpret&amp;nbsp;the 248,130,440 reported by ethtool as legit ring buffer drops, while anything above that is trash traffic (2,102,904 delta for your last data set).&amp;nbsp; The fact that RX-DRP is still incrementing but nothing is advancing under ethtool indicates a constant stream of trash traffic (undesirable EtherTypes like IPv6 or improperly pruned VLAN tags).&amp;nbsp; Legit ring buffer drops tend to come in clumps and not slowly accumulate.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2023 12:46:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/no-rx-missed-errors-counter-in-i40e-interface/m-p/199965#M37506</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-07T12:46:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: no rx_missed_errors counter in i40e interface?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/no-rx-missed-errors-counter-in-i40e-interface/m-p/199971#M37508</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/597"&gt;@Timothy_Hall&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;The fact that RX-DRP is still incrementing but nothing is advancing under ethtool indicates a constant stream of trash traffic (undesirable EtherTypes like IPv6 or improperly pruned VLAN tags).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Full ACK. I also saw it's incremented exactly every 30 seconds.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2023 13:54:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/no-rx-missed-errors-counter-in-i40e-interface/m-p/199971#M37508</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-07T13:54:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

