<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How ISP Redundancy works in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/How-ISP-Redundancy-works/m-p/198592#M37185</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81_NextGenSecurityGateway_Guide/Topics-FWG/ISP-Redundancy-configuring.htm?tocpath=ISP%20Redundancy%20on%20a%20Security%20Gateway%7C_____1" target="_blank"&gt;https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81_NextGenSecurityGateway_Guide/Topics-FWG/ISP-Redundancy-configuring.htm?tocpath=ISP%20Redundancy%20on%20a%20Security%20Gateway%7C_____1&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 22:12:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-11-21T22:12:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How ISP Redundancy works</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/How-ISP-Redundancy-works/m-p/198584#M37184</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I currently have a customer who has enabled the ISP Redundancy mechanism.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have 2 ISPs, and the feature is already enabled, but the monitoring of the links indicates that ISP1 is practically working with all the traffic.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The ISP Redundancy is enabled in Load Sharing mode, but I would think that it should "balance" the traffic in an "equal" way, or not?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The Load Sharing mode of ISP Redundancy guarantees that both links I have will be used equally, or not?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to "define" the percentage of traffic load that each link should "process"?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for your comments.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 21:26:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/How-ISP-Redundancy-works/m-p/198584#M37184</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matlu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-21T21:26:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How ISP Redundancy works</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/How-ISP-Redundancy-works/m-p/198592#M37185</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81_NextGenSecurityGateway_Guide/Topics-FWG/ISP-Redundancy-configuring.htm?tocpath=ISP%20Redundancy%20on%20a%20Security%20Gateway%7C_____1" target="_blank"&gt;https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81_NextGenSecurityGateway_Guide/Topics-FWG/ISP-Redundancy-configuring.htm?tocpath=ISP%20Redundancy%20on%20a%20Security%20Gateway%7C_____1&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 22:12:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/How-ISP-Redundancy-works/m-p/198592#M37185</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-21T22:12:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How ISP Redundancy works</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/How-ISP-Redundancy-works/m-p/198594#M37186</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Buddy,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What is the most "practical" way to test ISP Redundancy in a Load Sharing mode?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If I have 2 ISPs, and I give ISP1 a 75 (Weight) and ISP2 a 25 (Weight).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is there any way, from the same Check Point point of view, to "make sure" that this order that was declared in the configuration is "respected"?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Greetings.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 23:09:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/How-ISP-Redundancy-works/m-p/198594#M37186</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matlu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-21T23:09:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How ISP Redundancy works</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/How-ISP-Redundancy-works/m-p/198595#M37187</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I dont know all the possible methods as far as %age goes, because I always implement HA method (find it works way better), but 75-25 split sounds reasonable.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 23:11:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/How-ISP-Redundancy-works/m-p/198595#M37187</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-21T23:11:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

