<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IPSEC VSX load balance in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/IPSEC-VSX-load-balance/m-p/197321#M36863</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I believe load balancing is not possible with third party.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 14:07:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-11-07T14:07:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IPSEC VSX load balance</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/IPSEC-VSX-load-balance/m-p/197207#M36818</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is my scneario, r81 Vsystem:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a vpn community IPSEC from my peer Ckp-Vs-SG to 2 different fgt peers, Fgt-A and Fgt-B.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MEP Manually:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fgt-A is the primay under MEP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fgt-B is the secondary under MEP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So now I want to send traffic to both Fgt-A and B and balance. How to set this on CKP side?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Route based it is not supported on vsx, right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The final result is active/active VPN balancing traffic between the Fortigate side.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Victor C&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2023 22:55:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/IPSEC-VSX-load-balance/m-p/197207#M36818</guid>
      <dc:creator>victor_cortez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-06T22:55:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPSEC VSX load balance</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/IPSEC-VSX-load-balance/m-p/197238#M36823</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;More detailed description would be helpful.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I understand Fgt as Fortigate at the remote site. This requires the use of DPD (DeadPeerDetection) with third party VPN gateways. Follow&amp;nbsp;&lt;A title="VPN redundancy does not work when establishing an IPsec VPN Tunnel with a third-party peer" href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk164355" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;VPN redundancy does not work when establishing an IPsec VPN Tunnel with a third-party peer&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;to configure.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2023 20:42:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/IPSEC-VSX-load-balance/m-p/197238#M36823</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-06T20:42:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPSEC VSX load balance</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/IPSEC-VSX-load-balance/m-p/197246#M36827</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I want active/active balancing traffic through both Fortigates A and B.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2023 22:56:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/IPSEC-VSX-load-balance/m-p/197246#M36827</guid>
      <dc:creator>victor_cortez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-06T22:56:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPSEC VSX load balance</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/IPSEC-VSX-load-balance/m-p/197248#M36828</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Route based (VTI) is supported on VSX with dynamic routing (BGP) in R81.x&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2023 23:46:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/IPSEC-VSX-load-balance/m-p/197248#M36828</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-06T23:46:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPSEC VSX load balance</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/IPSEC-VSX-load-balance/m-p/197321#M36863</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I believe load balancing is not possible with third party.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 14:07:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/IPSEC-VSX-load-balance/m-p/197321#M36863</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-07T14:07:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

