<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Active/Standby Bridge Topology Table in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Active-Standby-Bridge-Topology-Table/m-p/194415#M36178</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;You can use bonded interfaces with bridge mode, yes.&lt;BR /&gt;You can also have L3 interfaces, but note the limitation around Double Inspection:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk172204" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk172204&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Specifically, make sure that traffic does not traverse both an L2 and an L3 interface.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Management traffic can do so with a configuration change:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk105899" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk105899&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2023 16:08:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-10-06T16:08:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Active/Standby Bridge Topology Table</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Active-Standby-Bridge-Topology-Table/m-p/193475#M35956</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm setting up an Active/Standby Bridge with two bridge groups.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bridge Group 1: Eth1 &amp;lt;&amp;gt; Eth2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bridge Group 2: Eth3 &amp;lt;&amp;gt; Eth4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can see the bridge interfaces when I create the gateway at SmartConsole. But when creating the cluster bridge interfaces aren't discovered.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First and foremost is this behaviour is normal?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can I achieve segregated policy packages per bridge group?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since the bridge interfaces are not available in the topology table, we can’t protect them against Anti-spoofing. Is there any method to achieve this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 13:25:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Active-Standby-Bridge-Topology-Table/m-p/193475#M35956</guid>
      <dc:creator>prashanth</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-25T13:25:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Active/Standby Bridge Topology Table</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Active-Standby-Bridge-Topology-Table/m-p/193502#M35961</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is normal and documented:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81.10/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81.10_Installation_and_Upgrade_Guide/Topics-IUG/Configuring-ClusterXL-in-Bridge-Mode-Active-Standby-with-Two-Switches.htm" target="_blank"&gt;https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81.10/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81.10_Installation_and_Upgrade_Guide/Topics-IUG/Configuring-ClusterXL-in-Bridge-Mode-Active-Standby-with-Two-Switches.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Make sure the Bridge interface and Bridge subordinate interfaces are not in the Topology.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;You cannot define the Topology of the Bridge interface. It is External by default.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To have a different policy for each bridge, you will need to use VSX (putting each bridge in a separate VS).&lt;BR /&gt;See also (for various limitations):&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk101371" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk101371&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 17:59:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Active-Standby-Bridge-Topology-Table/m-p/193502#M35961</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-25T17:59:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Active/Standby Bridge Topology Table</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Active-Standby-Bridge-Topology-Table/m-p/194277#M36148</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/7"&gt;@PhoneBoy&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Once we have converted the cluster into an Active/Standby bridge mode is it recommended to use other interface types such as Bond/L3 along with the bridge interfaces?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 01:54:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Active-Standby-Bridge-Topology-Table/m-p/194277#M36148</guid>
      <dc:creator>prashanth</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-05T01:54:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Active/Standby Bridge Topology Table</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Active-Standby-Bridge-Topology-Table/m-p/194415#M36178</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You can use bonded interfaces with bridge mode, yes.&lt;BR /&gt;You can also have L3 interfaces, but note the limitation around Double Inspection:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk172204" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk172204&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Specifically, make sure that traffic does not traverse both an L2 and an L3 interface.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Management traffic can do so with a configuration change:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk105899" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk105899&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2023 16:08:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Active-Standby-Bridge-Topology-Table/m-p/194415#M36178</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-06T16:08:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

