<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ClusterXL - 6200P - Cluster issue in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-6200P-Cluster-issue/m-p/193360#M35921</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have two Check Point 6200P in two different parts of a building - running ClusterXL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I feel like i am super close getting this to work - however experiencing one issue when running "cphaprob stat":&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FW02&amp;gt; cphaprob stat&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cluster Mode: High Availability (Active Up) with IGMP Membership&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ID Unique Address Assigned Load State Name&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1 192.168.10.1 100% ACTIVE FW01&lt;BR /&gt;2 (local) 192.168.10.2 0% DOWN FW02&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Active PNOTEs: LPRB, IAC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Last member state change event:&lt;BR /&gt;Event Code: CLUS-110800&lt;BR /&gt;State change: ACTIVE -&amp;gt; DOWN&lt;BR /&gt;Reason for state change: &lt;STRONG&gt;Incorrect configuration - Local cluster member has fewer cluster interfaces configured compared to other cluster member(s)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Event time: Fri Sep 22 14:55:29 2023.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have checked that the interfaces in Network Manager are the same, and the same amount on both FW`s.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can anyone please point me in the right direction?&lt;BR /&gt;Let me know if you need more information &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 14:48:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ftangen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-09-22T14:48:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ClusterXL - 6200P - Cluster issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-6200P-Cluster-issue/m-p/193360#M35921</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have two Check Point 6200P in two different parts of a building - running ClusterXL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I feel like i am super close getting this to work - however experiencing one issue when running "cphaprob stat":&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FW02&amp;gt; cphaprob stat&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cluster Mode: High Availability (Active Up) with IGMP Membership&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ID Unique Address Assigned Load State Name&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1 192.168.10.1 100% ACTIVE FW01&lt;BR /&gt;2 (local) 192.168.10.2 0% DOWN FW02&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Active PNOTEs: LPRB, IAC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Last member state change event:&lt;BR /&gt;Event Code: CLUS-110800&lt;BR /&gt;State change: ACTIVE -&amp;gt; DOWN&lt;BR /&gt;Reason for state change: &lt;STRONG&gt;Incorrect configuration - Local cluster member has fewer cluster interfaces configured compared to other cluster member(s)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Event time: Fri Sep 22 14:55:29 2023.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have checked that the interfaces in Network Manager are the same, and the same amount on both FW`s.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can anyone please point me in the right direction?&lt;BR /&gt;Let me know if you need more information &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 14:48:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-6200P-Cluster-issue/m-p/193360#M35921</guid>
      <dc:creator>ftangen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-22T14:48:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ClusterXL - 6200P - Cluster issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-6200P-Cluster-issue/m-p/193408#M35932</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Here is some more information.&lt;BR /&gt;What i find strange is that under Required Interfaces there is a difference:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="am if .png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/22554iB154FB56FA28C200/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="am if .png" alt="am if .png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="show-bond and if.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/22553i40560FD6FEBF01AF/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="show-bond and if.png" alt="show-bond and if.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2023 07:13:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-6200P-Cluster-issue/m-p/193408#M35932</guid>
      <dc:creator>ftangen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-23T07:13:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ClusterXL - 6200P - Cluster issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-6200P-Cluster-issue/m-p/193453#M35940</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Start with the cables connected to eth2 and eth3.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 06:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-6200P-Cluster-issue/m-p/193453#M35940</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-25T06:32:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ClusterXL - 6200P - Cluster issue</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-6200P-Cluster-issue/m-p/193457#M35941</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the response!&lt;BR /&gt;I ran show interface eth1-03 and 02 and it only showed traffic one way - and accoring to what i have found out that will make the cluster down.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have got the eth2 sorted out now - and hopefully we get thte eth1-03 fixed by end of today.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Will update here with the solution as soon as possible - if it worked.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 07:02:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-6200P-Cluster-issue/m-p/193457#M35941</guid>
      <dc:creator>ftangen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-25T07:02:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

