<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: New! R80.30 feature: Management Data Plane Separation (for gateways with 4+ cores) in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/192951#M35686</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;OK Thanks a lot&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2023 15:48:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CarlosDias</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-09-18T15:48:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>New! R80.30 feature: Management Data Plane Separation (for gateways with 4+ cores)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/47633#M3540</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="rs1810300033.png" style="width: 309px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/213i031516A0C6B3F7A5/image-dimensions/309x179?v=v2" width="309" height="179" role="button" title="rs1810300033.png" alt="rs1810300033.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I really like the all new R80.30 feature for separating management from data traffic via&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Routing Separation and&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Resource Separation&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;as described in &lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk138672" target="_self"&gt;sk138672&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Did anyone test this already?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2020 07:20:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/47633#M3540</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-27T07:20:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New! R80.30 feature: Management Data Plane Separation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/47641#M3541</link>
      <description>it is about time! finally arrived.&lt;BR /&gt;will test it soon and report back &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:16:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/47641#M3541</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-19T11:16:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New! R80.30 feature: Management Data Plane Separation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/47706#M3542</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;About time!&amp;nbsp; This is a long over due feature!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 12:55:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/47706#M3542</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tommy_Forrest</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-19T12:55:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New! R80.30 feature: Management Data Plane Separation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/47784#M3546</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;"Use of logical interfaces is not suppoted on management interface (Alias, Bridge, VPN Tunnel, 6in4 Tunnel, PPPoE, &lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Bond, VLAN&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;)"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1. It is a pity. Showstopper for us.&lt;BR /&gt;2. There is typo (suppoted&amp;nbsp; -&amp;gt; supported).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 21:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/47784#M3546</guid>
      <dc:creator>JozkoMrkvicka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-19T21:14:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New! R80.30 feature: Management Data Plane Separation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/47788#M3547</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Very interesting information.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I will test it tomorrow in our LAB:-)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 19:46:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/47788#M3547</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-19T19:46:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New! R80.30 feature: Management Data Plane Separation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/47790#M3548</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;With Resource Separation the cpu load should not rise when installing the policy. Is that correct?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="mng.PNG" style="width: 664px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/272i1711591775898F20/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="mng.PNG" alt="mng.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 20:01:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/47790#M3548</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-19T20:01:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New! R80.30 feature: Management Data Plane Separation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/47793#M3549</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/7" target="_self"&gt;Dameon,&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do I need a license for the management instance or lose a core license?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Heiko&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 20:13:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/47793#M3549</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-19T20:13:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New! R80.30 feature: Management Data Plane Separation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/47829#M3550</link>
      <description>I assume this dedicated CPU core is treated like any other core: you need a license for it. A minimum of 8 CPU cores are required to use this feature, which means your Open Server license must be for at least 8 cores. Beyond that, no special licensing requirements.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 22:07:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/47829#M3550</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-19T22:07:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New! R80.30 feature: Management Data Plane Separation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/48122#M3575</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So anything below 5900 will not be able to take advantage of it...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2019 15:01:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/48122#M3575</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-21T15:01:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New! R80.30 feature: Management Data Plane Separation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/48134#M3576</link>
      <description>Sounds about right.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2019 15:19:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/48134#M3576</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-21T15:19:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New! R80.30 feature: Management Data Plane Separation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/48140#M3577</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Danny, you may want to change the heading by adding "for gateways with 8 or more cores".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Otherwise it leads to unwarranted euphoria &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2019 15:48:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/48140#M3577</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-21T15:48:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New! R80.30 feature: Management Data Plane Separation</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/48175#M3578</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Added.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2019 21:01:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/48175#M3578</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-21T21:01:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New! R80.30 feature: Management Data Plane Separation (for gateways with 8+ cores)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/57936#M4340</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I do have a concern about the best practices from the article:&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk138672" target="_self"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk138672&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"Connectivity to the LDAP and similar servers from the Gateway should be done via the Data Plane."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've always been told that only the management/control plane of a security gateway should be making or allowing connections to the device.&amp;nbsp; The data plane should not allow or make connections, it should only play the role of traffic cop.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is everyone's thoughts on this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:05:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/57936#M4340</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nicholas_Moore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-10T17:05:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New! R80.30 feature: Management Data Plane Separation (for gateways with 8+ cores)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/83205#M6429</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;FYI this was changed to min 4 recently&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2020 15:01:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/83205#M6429</guid>
      <dc:creator>John_Michealson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-26T15:01:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New! R80.30 feature: Management Data Plane Separation (for gateways with 8+ cores)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/83241#M6434</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the info. I changed the thread title from 8&amp;nbsp; to 4 CPU cores.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2020 07:21:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/83241#M6434</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-27T07:21:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New! R80.30 feature: Management Data Plane Separation (for gateways with 4+ cores)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/84843#M6546</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#008000"&gt;I tested and worked successfully. (resource&amp;amp;routing both enabled)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#FF6600"&gt;It's not possible to use mgmt ip on identity collector and i think it should be.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;Could you please add a service/task for this issue?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;XXXXXXXXX:TACP-0&amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;show mdps state&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Management Data plane separation:&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Routing plane: Enabled&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Dedicated resource: Enabled (FW-Instance [39,38], CPU [4,28])&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Management interface: Mgmt&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Sync interface: Sync&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Management plane configured routes:&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;default via X.X.X.X&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;XXXXXXXXX:TACP-0&amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;show mdps tasks&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Management plane tasks:&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Service: cpri_d&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Service: ntpd&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Service: sshd&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Service: syslog&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Process: cloningd&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Process: httpd2&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Process: ntpd&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Process: snmpd&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Process: snmpmonitor&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Port;Protocol: 256;tcp&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Port;Protocol: 257;tcp&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Port;Protocol: 2010;tcp&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Port;Protocol: 5432;tcp&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Port;Protocol: 18181;tcp&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Port;Protocol: 18183;tcp&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Port;Protocol: 18184;tcp&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Port;Protocol: 18187;tcp&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Port;Protocol: 18191;tcp&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Port;Protocol: 18192;tcp&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Port;Protocol: 18195;tcp&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Port;Protocol: 18210;tcp&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Port;Protocol: 18211;tcp&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Port;Protocol: 18264;tcp&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 13:58:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/84843#M6546</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ramazan_Sengul</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-11T13:58:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New! R80.30 feature: Management Data Plane Separation (for gateways with 4+ cores)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/85827#M6624</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I tried mdps in the lab. I have two issues so far:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Can't make backup traffic to go over Mgmt interface, it attempts ssh connections on one of the data interfaces instead, even if I try to backup gateway to a management appliance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. TACACS traffic on port 49 goes over Mgmt interface during initial login the the gateway, which is expected, then it attempts to go over data interface for some reason during 2nd authentication when I try escalate my privileges from TACP-0 to TACP-15.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These two issues are show stoppers for us to deploy this feature.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 02:45:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/85827#M6624</guid>
      <dc:creator>azadvinskiy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-20T02:45:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New! R80.30 feature: Management Data Plane Separation (for gateways with 4+ cores)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/92562#M7136</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have exactly the same issue with R80.40 latest ongoing JHF:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Identity Collector planned to communicate with different firewalls in different zones and the only common network is the mgmt&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. We also can't apply JHF using CPUSE GUI, just CLI&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. Lastly, the default route disappears occasionally after a reboot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. Only one sync is supported&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any light at the end of the tunnel? I wish it would work more like a routing domain with more flexibility.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2020 01:55:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/92562#M7136</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex_Shpilman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-28T01:55:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New! R80.30 feature: Management Data Plane Separation (for gateways with 4+ cores)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/92602#M7142</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please move clish to mplane environment:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;'set mdps environment mplane'&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Alternatively you can move confd to mplane permanently via 'add mdps task process confd' (requires reboot)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:44:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/92602#M7142</guid>
      <dc:creator>Aviad_Hadarian</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-28T10:44:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New! R80.30 feature: Management Data Plane Separation (for gateways with 4+ cores)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/92603#M7143</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Alex,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can you share the following please?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;'dbget -rv mdps'&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also why do you need more than once interface for Sync? you can use link aggregation (bond) instead.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:47:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/New-R80-30-feature-Management-Data-Plane-Separation-for-gateways/m-p/92603#M7143</guid>
      <dc:creator>Aviad_Hadarian</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-28T10:47:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

