<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ISP redundancy Load sharing one link failure in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redundancy-Load-sharing-one-link-failure/m-p/47327#M3514</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, but open connections that were using the 40% ISP at time of ISP failover to the 60% ISP will be killed and have to restart.&amp;nbsp; This is because the NAT address for the connection must change upon ISP failover, and a existing connection cannot have its NAT address changed once the connection is established.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 02:00:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-18T02:00:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISP redundancy Load sharing one link failure</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redundancy-Load-sharing-one-link-failure/m-p/47243#M3509</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Team,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have configure ISP redundancy &amp;gt; load sharing in Checkpoint r80.20. I have managed to send traffic 60% and 40% from 2 ISP links.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If one of the ISP link (suppose 40%) goes down, does all the traffic goes via another ISP which is handling 60% traffic?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2019 06:24:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redundancy-Load-sharing-one-link-failure/m-p/47243#M3509</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nischit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-17T06:24:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISP redundancy Load sharing one link failure</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redundancy-Load-sharing-one-link-failure/m-p/47274#M3512</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, that’s how ISP Redundancy works.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2019 16:02:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redundancy-Load-sharing-one-link-failure/m-p/47274#M3512</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-17T16:02:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISP redundancy Load sharing one link failure</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redundancy-Load-sharing-one-link-failure/m-p/47327#M3514</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, but open connections that were using the 40% ISP at time of ISP failover to the 60% ISP will be killed and have to restart.&amp;nbsp; This is because the NAT address for the connection must change upon ISP failover, and a existing connection cannot have its NAT address changed once the connection is established.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 02:00:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redundancy-Load-sharing-one-link-failure/m-p/47327#M3514</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-18T02:00:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISP redundancy Load sharing one link failure</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redundancy-Load-sharing-one-link-failure/m-p/47341#M3515</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am not sure for R80.20, but ISP load sharing disables SecureXL to large extent (only local traffic is accelerated). Keep that in mind.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 04:27:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redundancy-Load-sharing-one-link-failure/m-p/47341#M3515</guid>
      <dc:creator>HristoGrigorov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-18T04:27:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

