<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 7000 gateway cluster moving from 1 Gig interface to 10 Gig in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/7000-gateway-cluster-moving-from-1-Gig-interface-to-10-Gig/m-p/186746#M34355</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;one thing to to consider here is whether you should set it up as a bond (LACP) with only one 10G link to start.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;That way, if you find in the future you need more, its just adding another 10G to your bond.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Avoid the same issue you ran into in the first place &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 19:27:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Scottc98</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-07-18T19:27:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>7000 gateway cluster moving from 1 Gig interface to 10 Gig</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/7000-gateway-cluster-moving-from-1-Gig-interface-to-10-Gig/m-p/168424#M30468</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi team.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am sure similar questions have been asked under different scenarios, and I apologize for repeating it again.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are planning to move our Core to FW link from 1 Gig (RJ45) to 10 Gig (SFP). We have a cluster of 2 gateways in active/standby scenarios. They are configured with static IP's on the FW and on the core are part of a vlan. Our internal routes points to the gateway IP connected to the inside interface. What will be the best approach to getting this moved over with minimal downtime.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:18:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/7000-gateway-cluster-moving-from-1-Gig-interface-to-10-Gig/m-p/168424#M30468</guid>
      <dc:creator>aboo008</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-19T18:18:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7000 gateway cluster moving from 1 Gig interface to 10 Gig</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/7000-gateway-cluster-moving-from-1-Gig-interface-to-10-Gig/m-p/168456#M30478</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I cant really speak to your specific scenario, but I can tell you that every time I dealt with this sort of scenarion, as long as below things are in check, you will be fine, 100% (not necessarily in this order):&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1) cabling&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2) speed/duplex matching&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3) IP addressing&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;4) VLAN config&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;5) routing&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 00:59:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/7000-gateway-cluster-moving-from-1-Gig-interface-to-10-Gig/m-p/168456#M30478</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-20T00:59:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7000 gateway cluster moving from 1 Gig interface to 10 Gig</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/7000-gateway-cluster-moving-from-1-Gig-interface-to-10-Gig/m-p/168474#M30483</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Perform the change on the standby member first.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are the existing connections part of a bond/etherchannel at all?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 08:20:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/7000-gateway-cluster-moving-from-1-Gig-interface-to-10-Gig/m-p/168474#M30483</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-20T08:20:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7000 gateway cluster moving from 1 Gig interface to 10 Gig</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/7000-gateway-cluster-moving-from-1-Gig-interface-to-10-Gig/m-p/169511#M30697</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey Cris, which plan in case of LACP bond interface?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;if a remember correctly LACP bond is not possible with mismatched interface speed. With Active/Backup bond it should be possible, so the trick "first standby member then the active" is good, am i right?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2023 09:15:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/7000-gateway-cluster-moving-from-1-Gig-interface-to-10-Gig/m-p/169511#M30697</guid>
      <dc:creator>CheckPointerXL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-29T09:15:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7000 gateway cluster moving from 1 Gig interface to 10 Gig</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/7000-gateway-cluster-moving-from-1-Gig-interface-to-10-Gig/m-p/169548#M30716</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If there are existing bonds and you are working with a cluster in theory there isn't a need to mix speeds.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On the standby you simply remove the old slaves and add new, failover and repeat (from memory).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2023 09:56:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/7000-gateway-cluster-moving-from-1-Gig-interface-to-10-Gig/m-p/169548#M30716</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-30T09:56:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7000 gateway cluster moving from 1 Gig interface to 10 Gig</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/7000-gateway-cluster-moving-from-1-Gig-interface-to-10-Gig/m-p/186730#M34352</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sorry for this late response but no they are not part of a etherchannel. The firewalls working in HA as a Active/Standby.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 16:33:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/7000-gateway-cluster-moving-from-1-Gig-interface-to-10-Gig/m-p/186730#M34352</guid>
      <dc:creator>aboo008</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-18T16:33:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7000 gateway cluster moving from 1 Gig interface to 10 Gig</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/7000-gateway-cluster-moving-from-1-Gig-interface-to-10-Gig/m-p/186746#M34355</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;one thing to to consider here is whether you should set it up as a bond (LACP) with only one 10G link to start.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;That way, if you find in the future you need more, its just adding another 10G to your bond.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Avoid the same issue you ran into in the first place &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 19:27:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/7000-gateway-cluster-moving-from-1-Gig-interface-to-10-Gig/m-p/186746#M34355</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scottc98</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-18T19:27:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7000 gateway cluster moving from 1 Gig interface to 10 Gig</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/7000-gateway-cluster-moving-from-1-Gig-interface-to-10-Gig/m-p/186747#M34356</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Great point&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/28302"&gt;@Scottc98&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 19:36:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/7000-gateway-cluster-moving-from-1-Gig-interface-to-10-Gig/m-p/186747#M34356</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-18T19:36:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7000 gateway cluster moving from 1 Gig interface to 10 Gig</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/7000-gateway-cluster-moving-from-1-Gig-interface-to-10-Gig/m-p/186752#M34357</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for that info, will do that with this move form 1 Gig to 10 Gig.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 19:43:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/7000-gateway-cluster-moving-from-1-Gig-interface-to-10-Gig/m-p/186752#M34357</guid>
      <dc:creator>aboo008</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-18T19:43:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7000 gateway cluster moving from 1 Gig interface to 10 Gig</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/7000-gateway-cluster-moving-from-1-Gig-interface-to-10-Gig/m-p/186754#M34358</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Still waiting to see a clear step by step instructions to move from 1 Gig interface to 10 Gig. We want to keep the IP's the same and configuration. Static routes which are not point to the 1 Gig interface should be fine and only those are pointing to the interface will need to be changed. Any other caveats tips. Thanks.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 19:44:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/7000-gateway-cluster-moving-from-1-Gig-interface-to-10-Gig/m-p/186754#M34358</guid>
      <dc:creator>aboo008</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-18T19:44:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

