<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: R81.10 static protocol-rank support in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-10-static-protocol-rank-support/m-p/184439#M33895</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;All static routes or specific ones?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The set static-route CLISH command provides a "rank" parameter.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Refer:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81_Gaia_AdminGuide/Topics-GAG/IPv4-Static-Routes-Gaia-Clish.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81_Gaia_AdminGuide/Topics-GAG/IPv4-Static-Routes-Gaia-Clish.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/r81.10/webadminguides/en/cp_r81.10_gaia_advanced_routing_adminguide/topics-garg/routing-options-protocol-rank.htm" target="_blank"&gt;https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/r81.10/webadminguides/en/cp_r81.10_gaia_advanced_routing_adminguide/topics-garg/routing-options-protocol-rank.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:27:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-21T12:27:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>R81.10 static protocol-rank support</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-10-static-protocol-rank-support/m-p/184424#M33894</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Check Point Community&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My customer using security gateway 7000 running R81.10. they have multiple route to the same IP destination(static and OSPF). they want to priorities to static route by define rank to 5 and keep OSPF as default 10. well known best route chosen refer to lowest rank.&amp;nbsp; actualy active route on ospf.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;does the R81.10 support static protocol-rank?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Noted: the output of show protocol-rank&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Protocol Rank &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;---------------- &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;kernel 10 &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;ospf 10 &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;bgp 20 &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;ip 30&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;thank&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:33:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-10-static-protocol-rank-support/m-p/184424#M33894</guid>
      <dc:creator>User-CP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-21T09:33:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R81.10 static protocol-rank support</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-10-static-protocol-rank-support/m-p/184439#M33895</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;All static routes or specific ones?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The set static-route CLISH command provides a "rank" parameter.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Refer:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81_Gaia_AdminGuide/Topics-GAG/IPv4-Static-Routes-Gaia-Clish.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81_Gaia_AdminGuide/Topics-GAG/IPv4-Static-Routes-Gaia-Clish.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/r81.10/webadminguides/en/cp_r81.10_gaia_advanced_routing_adminguide/topics-garg/routing-options-protocol-rank.htm" target="_blank"&gt;https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/r81.10/webadminguides/en/cp_r81.10_gaia_advanced_routing_adminguide/topics-garg/routing-options-protocol-rank.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:27:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-10-static-protocol-rank-support/m-p/184439#M33895</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-21T12:27:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R81.10 static protocol-rank support</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-10-static-protocol-rank-support/m-p/184485#M33902</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hello Chis_atkinson&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you for your response,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this scenario, I try to define the static route over OSPF with the best route by set protocol-rank for static route to lower then ospf.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Important: for static route destination IP with slash /27 and ospf with slash /30.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it's the check point route algorithm prefer prefect then protocol rank?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2023 02:10:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-10-static-protocol-rank-support/m-p/184485#M33902</guid>
      <dc:creator>User-CP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-22T02:10:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R81.10 static protocol-rank support</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-10-static-protocol-rank-support/m-p/184487#M33903</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If the OSPF routes are more specific then rank won't come into the equation.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2023 02:41:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-10-static-protocol-rank-support/m-p/184487#M33903</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-22T02:41:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R81.10 static protocol-rank support</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-10-static-protocol-rank-support/m-p/184494#M33904</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;you have to have 2 exactly same networks with the same netmask in order to match the rank settings.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you have static route 10.0.0.0/24 with rank 1 and OSPF route 10.0.0.0/25 with rank 400, then traffic going to IP 10.0.0.20 chose OSPF because it is more specific. In this case rank doesnt play a role.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2023 05:46:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-10-static-protocol-rank-support/m-p/184494#M33904</guid>
      <dc:creator>JozkoMrkvicka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-22T05:46:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

