<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: R81.20 jumbo take 10 in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-20-jumbo-take-10/m-p/179274#M32855</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have seen instances in the past where other, not publicly documented fixes were included in a JHF.&lt;BR /&gt;Not sure if that happened in this case.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 23:59:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-04-26T23:59:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>R81.20 jumbo take 10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-20-jumbo-take-10/m-p/179264#M32852</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey guys,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If anyone out there is thinking about installing this hotfix, I would certainly recommend it. Apears once I installed it in my lab on both mgmt and gateway, everything seems to go much more smoothly than before...policy push, smart console more responsive, https inspection, desktop policy.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I know it says there is only single fix available (as per release notes), but from what I saw, it makes R81.20 definitely more stable.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 19:53:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-20-jumbo-take-10/m-p/179264#M32852</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-26T19:53:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R81.20 jumbo take 10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-20-jumbo-take-10/m-p/179274#M32855</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have seen instances in the past where other, not publicly documented fixes were included in a JHF.&lt;BR /&gt;Not sure if that happened in this case.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 23:59:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-20-jumbo-take-10/m-p/179274#M32855</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-26T23:59:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R81.20 jumbo take 10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-20-jumbo-take-10/m-p/179281#M32858</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Its possible...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 00:48:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R81-20-jumbo-take-10/m-p/179281#M32858</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-27T00:48:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

