<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ISP redundancy static NAT in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redundancy-static-NAT/m-p/176817#M32382</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;R80.20 is End of Support, just FYI.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Even if you had enough IPs, how would you update&amp;nbsp;the DNS servers so people can connect to the servers when the Backup ISP is engaged?&lt;BR /&gt;Do all the servers need to be accessible on the same port (i.e. they're all web servers) or do some of them need to be accessible on different ports?&lt;BR /&gt;You might be able to do NAT based on service.&lt;BR /&gt;Not sure how that would impact the ISP Redundancy configuration.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 21:10:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-03-30T21:10:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISP redundancy static NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redundancy-static-NAT/m-p/176487#M32309</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm tasked with implementing ISP redundancy in primary/backup at one of our sites running ClusterXL on a pair of 5000 R80.20.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Primary ISP is configured with&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Static 1:1 NAT for servers on a /27 subnet. Backup ISP is providing a /29 subnet with not enough IP's to static NAT all the servers.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way that ISP redundancy can be achieved in this?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 10:50:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redundancy-static-NAT/m-p/176487#M32309</guid>
      <dc:creator>SupportAccount</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-30T10:50:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISP redundancy static NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redundancy-static-NAT/m-p/176817#M32382</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;R80.20 is End of Support, just FYI.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Even if you had enough IPs, how would you update&amp;nbsp;the DNS servers so people can connect to the servers when the Backup ISP is engaged?&lt;BR /&gt;Do all the servers need to be accessible on the same port (i.e. they're all web servers) or do some of them need to be accessible on different ports?&lt;BR /&gt;You might be able to do NAT based on service.&lt;BR /&gt;Not sure how that would impact the ISP Redundancy configuration.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 21:10:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redundancy-static-NAT/m-p/176817#M32382</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-30T21:10:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISP redundancy static NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redundancy-static-NAT/m-p/176822#M32386</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Definitely valid points by phoneboy. PAT maybe?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:08:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redundancy-static-NAT/m-p/176822#M32386</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-31T00:08:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

