<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Upgrade cluster hardware in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Upgrade-cluster-hardware/m-p/175808#M32102</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have a cluster of two Open Servers running R80.40. We need to replace the servers with new ones. And we'd like to upgrade to R81.10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would it be less disruptive to install R80.40 on the new hardware and after the new servers are up and running in the cluster upgrade to R81.10?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm looking at sk107042 and for multi-version cluster upgrade it says VPN connections won't survive a failover and we would like to avoid that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2023 17:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>flachance</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-03-22T17:30:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Upgrade cluster hardware</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Upgrade-cluster-hardware/m-p/175808#M32102</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have a cluster of two Open Servers running R80.40. We need to replace the servers with new ones. And we'd like to upgrade to R81.10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would it be less disruptive to install R80.40 on the new hardware and after the new servers are up and running in the cluster upgrade to R81.10?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm looking at sk107042 and for multi-version cluster upgrade it says VPN connections won't survive a failover and we would like to avoid that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2023 17:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Upgrade-cluster-hardware/m-p/175808#M32102</guid>
      <dc:creator>flachance</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-22T17:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Upgrade cluster hardware</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Upgrade-cluster-hardware/m-p/175809#M32103</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thats exactly what I did once with the customer. We installed same version and then upgraded...OR, you can follow below method, its also super useful and it does work&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Security-Gateways/Replace-Upgrade-Cluster/td-p/69216" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Security-Gateways/Replace-Upgrade-Cluster/td-p/69216&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2023 17:38:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Upgrade-cluster-hardware/m-p/175809#M32103</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-22T17:38:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Upgrade cluster hardware</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Upgrade-cluster-hardware/m-p/175814#M32105</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It would be smaller steps, so easier to confirm things are working. If you're going to do this, I would install R81.20 on the new systems and downgrade them to R80.40. The R81.20 installer fixes &lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Management/Gaia-partition-misalignment/m-p/161869" target="_self"&gt;a bug which resulted in misaligned partition layouts&lt;/A&gt; on all earlier versions. This greatly impacts storage I/O performance, most noticeable with small file operations.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This doesn't affect the MVC limitation. At some point, you will have a cluster with one member at R80.40 and one member at R81.10. When you fail over, you hit all the same MVC limitations regardless of the hardware situation. That said, I don't see anything about dropping site-to-site VPN connections unless they're traditional mode. Remote access connections drop.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2023 18:52:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Upgrade-cluster-hardware/m-p/175814#M32105</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bob_Zimmerman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-22T18:52:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Upgrade cluster hardware</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Upgrade-cluster-hardware/m-p/176089#M32185</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I wasn't aware of that bug. thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2023 14:04:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Upgrade-cluster-hardware/m-p/176089#M32185</guid>
      <dc:creator>flachance</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-24T14:04:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

