<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Looking for a Application for CIFS in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Looking-for-a-Application-for-CIFS/m-p/174830#M31839</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;CIFS is largely handled in the firewall, which doesn't make it a good candidate for pioneering the use of App Control.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 23:13:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-03-14T23:13:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Looking for a Application for CIFS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Looking-for-a-Application-for-CIFS/m-p/174807#M31827</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am putting together in initiative to pioneer the use of app control.&amp;nbsp; I see a lot of CIFS TCP Port 445 traffic I would secure.&amp;nbsp; I only see CIFS TCP Port 445, but I dont see anything at layer 7.&amp;nbsp; The goal is to implement layer 7 firewall rules.&amp;nbsp; Secondarily would be ports 135, 137, 138, and 139. NetBios.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:00:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Looking-for-a-Application-for-CIFS/m-p/174807#M31827</guid>
      <dc:creator>love-cw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-14T17:00:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Looking for a Application for CIFS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Looking-for-a-Application-for-CIFS/m-p/174822#M31833</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Have you looked at SMB in the AppWiki?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;sk101606 also provides additional detail on the deeper inspection possible for CIFS / SMB.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 22:47:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Looking-for-a-Application-for-CIFS/m-p/174822#M31833</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-14T22:47:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Looking for a Application for CIFS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Looking-for-a-Application-for-CIFS/m-p/174830#M31839</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;CIFS is largely handled in the firewall, which doesn't make it a good candidate for pioneering the use of App Control.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 23:13:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Looking-for-a-Application-for-CIFS/m-p/174830#M31839</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-14T23:13:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Looking for a Application for CIFS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Looking-for-a-Application-for-CIFS/m-p/174832#M31841</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I see the point Chris is making, since CIFS is sort same as SMB, so it would also use tcp port 445 and UDP ports 137 and 138 if I recall correctly. I will see if I can find anything in my R81.20 lab.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 23:24:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Looking-for-a-Application-for-CIFS/m-p/174832#M31841</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-14T23:24:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Looking for a Application for CIFS</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Looking-for-a-Application-for-CIFS/m-p/175025#M31877</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Damian is correct, the port is secured by the SMB protocol.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2023 17:42:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Looking-for-a-Application-for-CIFS/m-p/175025#M31877</guid>
      <dc:creator>love-cw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-15T17:42:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

