<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Asymmetric Routing in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Asymmetric-Routing/m-p/173736#M31614</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Learned something new. Never seen that option before&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/11879"&gt;@Vladimir&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;. Thanks for pointing that out &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":raising_hands:"&gt;🙌&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2023 16:30:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-03-06T16:30:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Asymmetric Routing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Asymmetric-Routing/m-p/173610#M31611</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We have this route-based&amp;nbsp;VPN with&amp;nbsp;partner. It is static routing with VPN site A as preferred. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Problem that sometimes&amp;nbsp;partner,&amp;nbsp;which is normally on-site&amp;nbsp;A, becomes Active on B site, while our route is still points to A. We see traffic all looks good, just the thing that we send traffic to site A and get it back through site B.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Looking at the logs i don't see drops, but&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;users say they have no connection.&amp;nbsp; Spoofing is not an issue, so not sure what exactly kills the connection.&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt; I assume Asymmetric routing is to blame one way or another.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt;Is there any way to live with Asymmetric&amp;nbsp;routing situation in Route Based VPN?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;(At the moment i have only static routing at my disposal, as have some corporate limitations on running dynamic routing on the firewalls.)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2023 17:05:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Asymmetric-Routing/m-p/173610#M31611</guid>
      <dc:creator>guesstimation</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-05T17:05:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Asymmetric Routing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Asymmetric-Routing/m-p/173613#M31612</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not sure if this would work, but in static routes, there is a way to configure IP Monitoring with "Force Interface Symmetry". You can play with that option.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2023 18:05:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Asymmetric-Routing/m-p/173613#M31612</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-05T18:05:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Asymmetric Routing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Asymmetric-Routing/m-p/173732#M31613</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, this does look like a potential way to resolve this.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2023 16:14:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Asymmetric-Routing/m-p/173732#M31613</guid>
      <dc:creator>guesstimation</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-06T16:14:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Asymmetric Routing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Asymmetric-Routing/m-p/173736#M31614</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Learned something new. Never seen that option before&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/11879"&gt;@Vladimir&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;. Thanks for pointing that out &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":raising_hands:"&gt;🙌&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2023 16:30:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Asymmetric-Routing/m-p/173736#M31614</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-06T16:30:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Asymmetric Routing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Asymmetric-Routing/m-p/173754#M31615</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What strange sorcery is this Vladimir?&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":grinning_face:"&gt;😀&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp; Never heard of "Force Interface Symmetry" for route IP Monitoring either.&amp;nbsp; Guess these are things you find out when you write &lt;A href="https://www.amazon.com/Check-Point-Firewall-Administration-R81-10/dp/180107271X" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;a book&lt;/A&gt; or something.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2023 17:57:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Asymmetric-Routing/m-p/173754#M31615</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-06T17:57:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Asymmetric Routing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Asymmetric-Routing/m-p/173756#M31616</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/597"&gt;@Timothy_Hall&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;haha, yea, things you find out when you write a book, not that I would know &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":face_with_tears_of_joy:"&gt;😂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":face_with_tears_of_joy:"&gt;😂&lt;/span&gt;. By the way, both your and&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/11879"&gt;@Vladimir&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;'s book...FANTASTIC &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":ok_hand:"&gt;👌&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":thumbs_up:"&gt;👍&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2023 18:17:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Asymmetric-Routing/m-p/173756#M31616</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-06T18:17:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Asymmetric Routing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Asymmetric-Routing/m-p/173761#M31617</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;To paraphrase Forrest Gump: Check Point is like a box of chocolates...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2023 19:56:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Asymmetric-Routing/m-p/173761#M31617</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-06T19:56:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Asymmetric Routing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Asymmetric-Routing/m-p/173766#M31618</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is an idea for CPX slogan ; - )&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2023 20:52:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Asymmetric-Routing/m-p/173766#M31618</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-06T20:52:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Asymmetric Routing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Asymmetric-Routing/m-p/173768#M31619</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yeah, I can see it going well with CP marketing:)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2023 23:14:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Asymmetric-Routing/m-p/173768#M31619</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-06T23:14:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Asymmetric Routing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Asymmetric-Routing/m-p/173769#M31620</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I know lol. But, in all honesty, me personally, I could care less what company motto/slogan is, as long as the product works and support is good.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2023 23:17:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Asymmetric-Routing/m-p/173769#M31620</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-06T23:17:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

