<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Gateway as HTTP/HTTPS Proxy in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Gateway-as-HTTP-HTTPS-Proxy/m-p/170960#M30979</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It being maestro i would also do an estimation of connection numbers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As the connection number limit in Maestro i much lower than on the regular gateway.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 09:50:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Machine_Head</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-02-10T09:50:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Gateway as HTTP/HTTPS Proxy</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Gateway-as-HTTP-HTTPS-Proxy/m-p/170946#M30974</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a requirement to use a gateway as HTTP / HTTPS proxy for around 25.000 clients. I'm not really happy in the past with the proxy feature on Check Point appliances and I know the limitation. We are in discussion with the local SEs but I want to ask here and maybe someone has experience wiht the newer releases and the proxy feature.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The gateway should be the proxy for the clients and forward the traffic to internet or another proxy and we want to do some URL-filtering on this traffic.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any suggestion are welcome.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 08:36:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Gateway-as-HTTP-HTTPS-Proxy/m-p/170946#M30974</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-10T08:36:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Gateway as HTTP/HTTPS Proxy</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Gateway-as-HTTP-HTTPS-Proxy/m-p/170952#M30975</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sizing is the primary concern since all traffic will be F2F, refer:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;sk92482 - Performance impact from enabling HTTP/HTTPS Proxy functionality&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 09:15:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Gateway-as-HTTP-HTTPS-Proxy/m-p/170952#M30975</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-10T09:15:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Gateway as HTTP/HTTPS Proxy</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Gateway-as-HTTP-HTTPS-Proxy/m-p/170953#M30976</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3630"&gt;@Chris_Atkinson&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Yes I know. We are running an Maestro environment and it's no problem to add more appliances. This is the real benefit of Maestro. Does Check Point knows such a solution with proxy feature enbled ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 09:26:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Gateway-as-HTTP-HTTPS-Proxy/m-p/170953#M30976</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-10T09:26:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Gateway as HTTP/HTTPS Proxy</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Gateway-as-HTTP-HTTPS-Proxy/m-p/170955#M30977</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In practice I've personally only seen this done across multiple discrete gateways / clusters using WPAD/PAC or DNS-RR to load-balance.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Possibly something you could replicate with multiple SGs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Would recommend having your SE engage with Solution Center to arrive at the correct approach.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 23:17:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Gateway-as-HTTP-HTTPS-Proxy/m-p/170955#M30977</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-10T23:17:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Gateway as HTTP/HTTPS Proxy</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Gateway-as-HTTP-HTTPS-Proxy/m-p/170960#M30979</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It being maestro i would also do an estimation of connection numbers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As the connection number limit in Maestro i much lower than on the regular gateway.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 09:50:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Gateway-as-HTTP-HTTPS-Proxy/m-p/170960#M30979</guid>
      <dc:creator>Machine_Head</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-10T09:50:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Gateway as HTTP/HTTPS Proxy</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Gateway-as-HTTP-HTTPS-Proxy/m-p/170985#M30982</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Whilst true to extent it depends on the exact number &amp;amp; model of gateways (and their memory population) used as to exactly how relevant that is to a given deployment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 23:18:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Gateway-as-HTTP-HTTPS-Proxy/m-p/170985#M30982</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-10T23:18:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

