<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: No LACP on 2x10G bond with Cisco 3850 in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/169892#M30801</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;Chris,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R81.20 no JHF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Switch-side configuration is similar for all 4 bonds, but only 1 bond is down.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface Port-channel3&lt;BR /&gt;description chkp01&lt;BR /&gt;switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/5&lt;BR /&gt;description chkp01&lt;BR /&gt;switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q&lt;BR /&gt;channel-protocol lacp&lt;BR /&gt;channel-group 3 mode active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/6&lt;BR /&gt;description chkp01&lt;BR /&gt;switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q&lt;BR /&gt;channel-protocol lacp&lt;BR /&gt;channel-group 3 mode active&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2023 11:44:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mikhail_Razumov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-02-01T11:44:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>No LACP on 2x10G bond with Cisco 3850</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/24341#M1879</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Having issue with R80.10 GW (ClusterXL members), on 13500 units (non-VSX):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LACP issue with Cisco 3850. Bond consisting of two 10G interfaces (same card on 13500s), show&amp;nbsp; Load Sharing being "Down" (bond1):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[Expert@CICNYCP1:0]# cphaconf show_bond -a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;|Slaves |Slaves |Slaves&lt;BR /&gt;Bond name |Mode&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;|State&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;|configured&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;|in use |required&lt;BR /&gt;-----------+-------------------+------+-----------+-------+--------&lt;BR /&gt;bond1&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;| Load Sharing |&amp;nbsp; DOWN&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;| 2&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;| 2&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;| 1&lt;BR /&gt;bond2&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;| Load Sharing |&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; UP&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;| 2&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;| 2&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;| 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[Expert@CICNYCP1:0]# cat /proc/net/bonding/bond1&lt;BR /&gt;Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.2.4 (January 28, 2008)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bonding Mode: IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation&lt;BR /&gt;Transmit Hash Policy: layer2 (0)&lt;BR /&gt;MII Status: up&lt;BR /&gt;MII Polling Interval (ms): 100&lt;BR /&gt;Up Delay (ms): 200&lt;BR /&gt;Down Delay (ms): 200&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;802.3ad info&lt;BR /&gt;LACP rate: slow&lt;BR /&gt;Active Aggregator Info:&lt;BR /&gt;Aggregator ID:&amp;nbsp;2&lt;BR /&gt;Number of ports: 1&lt;BR /&gt;Actor Key: 33&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Key: 1&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Mac Address: 00:00:00:00:00:00&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Slave Interface: eth2-02&lt;BR /&gt;MII Status: up&lt;BR /&gt;Link Failure Count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Permanent HW addr: 00:1c:7f:62:4c:8f&lt;BR /&gt;Aggregator ID: 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Slave Interface: eth2-01&lt;BR /&gt;MII Status: up&lt;BR /&gt;Link Failure Count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Permanent HW addr: 00:1c:7f:62:4c:8e&lt;BR /&gt;Aggregator ID: 2&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;While Cisco claims it is up:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;# show etherchannel&amp;nbsp;1&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;summary&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Number of channel-groups in use:&amp;nbsp;1&lt;BR /&gt;Number of aggregators:&amp;nbsp;1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Group&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Port-channel&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Protocol&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Ports&lt;BR /&gt;------------+-----------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;2&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Po2(SU)&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;LACP&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Te1/0/1(P)&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;Te2/0/1(P)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The bond2, same configuration on different card's 2x10G, connected to Nexus switch, actually works fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FYI: the data shown above is a doctored sample, I do not presently have access to the systems, but am fairly sure I am reproducing it accurately. Will update this question with live data next week.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If any of you have bumped into this one before, please share the solution or troubleshooting methods.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2018 14:24:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/24341#M1879</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-21T14:24:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No LACP on 2x10G bond with Cisco 3850</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/169866#M30791</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="" href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/11879" target="_self"&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Vladimir&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm having similar issue on 6200 and 1G bond. (3 bonds work fine, 1 down).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you succeeded in finding solution?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mikhail&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2023 07:03:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/169866#M30791</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mikhail_Razumov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-01T07:03:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No LACP on 2x10G bond with Cisco 3850</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/169881#M30795</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="" href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/11879" target="_self"&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Vladimir,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;I met the same issue with 6200 and 1G bond.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;3 bonds are UP, 1 - DOWN.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Have you succeeded in resolving the issue?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Mikhail&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2023 10:11:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/169881#M30795</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mikhail_Razumov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-01T10:11:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No LACP on 2x10G bond with Cisco 3850</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/169888#M30800</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What is the version/JHF and switch side configuration used?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2023 11:20:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/169888#M30800</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-01T11:20:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No LACP on 2x10G bond with Cisco 3850</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/169892#M30801</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;Chris,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R81.20 no JHF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Switch-side configuration is similar for all 4 bonds, but only 1 bond is down.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface Port-channel3&lt;BR /&gt;description chkp01&lt;BR /&gt;switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/5&lt;BR /&gt;description chkp01&lt;BR /&gt;switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q&lt;BR /&gt;channel-protocol lacp&lt;BR /&gt;channel-group 3 mode active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/6&lt;BR /&gt;description chkp01&lt;BR /&gt;switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q&lt;BR /&gt;channel-protocol lacp&lt;BR /&gt;channel-group 3 mode active&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2023 11:44:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/169892#M30801</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mikhail_Razumov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-01T11:44:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No LACP on 2x10G bond with Cisco 3850</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/169894#M30802</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;All ports on the same NIC on the CP side?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What does the etherchannel output on the Cisco side show and anything in the logs there?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2023 11:49:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/169894#M30802</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-01T11:49:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No LACP on 2x10G bond with Cisco 3850</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/169896#M30804</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Same NIC, yes. It's 8-port built-in NIC. ports 5 and 6.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco is not in my management.&amp;nbsp;I have this output from it (look for Po3):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Group Port-channel Protocol Ports&lt;BR /&gt;------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;1 Po1(SU) LACP Gi0/1(P) Gi0/2(P)&lt;BR /&gt;2 Po2(SU) LACP Gi0/3(P) Gi0/4(P)&lt;BR /&gt;3 Po3(SU) LACP Gi0/5(P) Gi0/6(P)&lt;BR /&gt;4 Po4(SU) LACP Gi0/7(P) Gi0/8(P)&lt;BR /&gt;14 Po14(SU) LACP Gi0/23(P) Gi0/24(P)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C3560CHKP#show interfaces status&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Port Name Status Vlan Duplex Speed Type&lt;BR /&gt;Gi0/1 chkp01_L2VS connected 1 a-full a-1000 10/100/1000BaseTX&lt;BR /&gt;Gi0/2 chkp01_L2VS connected 1 a-full a-1000 10/100/1000BaseTX&lt;BR /&gt;Gi0/3 chkp02_L3VS connected 1 a-full a-1000 10/100/1000BaseTX&lt;BR /&gt;Gi0/4 chkp02_L3VS connected 1 a-full a-1000 10/100/1000BaseTX&lt;BR /&gt;Gi0/5 chkp01_L3VS connected 1 a-full a-1000 10/100/1000BaseTX&lt;BR /&gt;Gi0/6 chkp01_L3VS connected 1 a-full a-1000 10/100/1000BaseTX&lt;BR /&gt;Gi0/7 chkp02_L2VS connected 1 a-full a-1000 10/100/1000BaseTX&lt;BR /&gt;Gi0/8 chkp02_L2VS connected 1 a-full a-1000 10/100/1000BaseTX&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2023 11:55:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/169896#M30804</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mikhail_Razumov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-01T11:55:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No LACP on 2x10G bond with Cisco 3850</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/169903#M30806</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it impacting one machine or both members of a cluster?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Depending my suggestions might be as follows:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Reboot the affected machine&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Remove and re-add the bond slave interfaces on the CP side.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3. If the issue persists raise it for investigation with TAC.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2023 12:20:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/169903#M30806</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-01T12:20:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No LACP on 2x10G bond with Cisco 3850</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/169905#M30807</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Both cluster members.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rebooted many times.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Re-added bond interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe I'l have to open ticket. My hope is that Vladimir (the topicstarter) has found solution (my symptoms are similar).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2023 12:32:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/169905#M30807</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mikhail_Razumov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-01T12:32:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No LACP on 2x10G bond with Cisco 3850</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/169939#M30818</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Perhaps though the hardware / software combination is widely different.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Assuming cabling has all been retraced / VLANs confirmed etc?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2023 15:27:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/169939#M30818</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-01T15:27:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No LACP on 2x10G bond with Cisco 3850</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/170030#M30831</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Cabling retraced.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note, that both&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;subordinate interfaces in bond are UP. If it were about cables, would they be UP?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;VLANs are checked as well. Though I doubt they can influence on LACP. Can they?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2023 07:08:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/170030#M30831</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mikhail_Razumov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-02T07:08:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No LACP on 2x10G bond with Cisco 3850</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/171350#M31068</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Finally we've found that the issue is related to&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;sk120684.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;By an unknown reason it was necessary to explicitly define native vlan 1 on Cisco 3560 trunk port in order to resolve the issue. Though it must be 1 by default.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 05:58:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-LACP-on-2x10G-bond-with-Cisco-3850/m-p/171350#M31068</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mikhail_Razumov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-14T05:58:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

