<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VPN networks - block access in community in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VPN-networks-block-access-in-community/m-p/169712#M30756</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Simply defining VPN community establishing the necessary conditions for the encrypted traffic between sites, but it is still subject to the Access Control policy rules.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can group the VPN rules under the same policy section with individual rules containing groups of networks, for compactness.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You may use a large parent rule for the Inline VPN policy, but then the parent rule should be permissive and the child rules should be restrictive. For me, this second option does not sound very appealing.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 05:53:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-01-31T05:53:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VPN networks - block access in community</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VPN-networks-block-access-in-community/m-p/169681#M30754</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi There,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to block (or provide access to specific networks in community). For example, i have one VPN community with five sites and each site has 3 networks, i need to open access:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Site1-Network1 to Site2-Network1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Site1-Network2 to Site2-Network2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Site1-Network3 to Site3-Network3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but&amp;nbsp;Site1-Network1&amp;nbsp; shouldnt get access Site2-Network2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;do i have to create separate VPN rules like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Source (Site1-Network1) to&amp;nbsp; Dest (Site2-Network1) - VPN Community&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or one big rule for VPN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Source (Site 1-5) to&amp;nbsp; Dest (Site 1-5) - VPN Community&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and next create separate security rules for each condition? like&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Source (Site1-Network1) to&amp;nbsp; Dest (Site2-Network1) - Any - Any&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just not clear for me, is it possible to play with access between networks in one VPN community or all networks inside will be accessible for each other&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 00:12:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VPN-networks-block-access-in-community/m-p/169681#M30754</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sergo89</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-31T00:12:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN networks - block access in community</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VPN-networks-block-access-in-community/m-p/169684#M30755</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Technically, you could do both, as long as there is no rule conflict. Like all vendors, rules go as Im sure you know, top to bottom, left to right. Though, but this is just me, maybe for better "separation", I would create different rules.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 01:07:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VPN-networks-block-access-in-community/m-p/169684#M30755</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-31T01:07:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN networks - block access in community</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VPN-networks-block-access-in-community/m-p/169712#M30756</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Simply defining VPN community establishing the necessary conditions for the encrypted traffic between sites, but it is still subject to the Access Control policy rules.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can group the VPN rules under the same policy section with individual rules containing groups of networks, for compactness.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You may use a large parent rule for the Inline VPN policy, but then the parent rule should be permissive and the child rules should be restrictive. For me, this second option does not sound very appealing.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 05:53:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VPN-networks-block-access-in-community/m-p/169712#M30756</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-31T05:53:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN networks - block access in community</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VPN-networks-block-access-in-community/m-p/169797#M30774</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;do you mean i can create "large parent rule" like all VPN sites - Any - Any - VPN community and next play with security rules - Net1 (site1) to Net(5) site3?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:26:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VPN-networks-block-access-in-community/m-p/169797#M30774</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sergo89</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-31T15:26:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN networks - block access in community</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VPN-networks-block-access-in-community/m-p/169799#M30775</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Im pretty sure thats what&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/11879"&gt;@Vladimir&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;meant.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VPN-networks-block-access-in-community/m-p/169799#M30775</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-31T15:31:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN networks - block access in community</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VPN-networks-block-access-in-community/m-p/169800#M30776</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Great! thank you very much guys!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:34:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VPN-networks-block-access-in-community/m-p/169800#M30776</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sergo89</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-31T15:34:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN networks - block access in community</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VPN-networks-block-access-in-community/m-p/169801#M30777</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, but I have stated earlier, the parent rule in this case will be permissive and the child rules restrictive.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You are better off having individual permissive rules grouped in the same policy section.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:37:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VPN-networks-block-access-in-community/m-p/169801#M30777</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-31T15:37:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN networks - block access in community</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VPN-networks-block-access-in-community/m-p/169804#M30778</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just to share quickly what I usually recommend to people and that seems to work real well. So, for all the interfaces, we assign zones to them and then say you can create inline parent rule, that goes like this -&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;src -&amp;gt; internal zone (referencing internal interface), dst -&amp;gt; any -&amp;gt; vpn -&amp;gt; any , services -&amp;gt; any -&amp;gt; action -&amp;gt; create new layer and call it say "internal layer"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Then, below that "parent" rule, you can set up all the child rules (as they call them) and at the bottom, you will have any any drop, which is EXPLICIT clean up rule...NOT to be confused with IMPLICIT clean up rule, always very last at the bottom of the rule base&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Having said this, we always say to customers to create VPN rules towards to top of the rulebase, not part of any inline layer, so that way, it would not "conflict" with anything.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope it makes sense, but happy to show you in my lab as well.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:44:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VPN-networks-block-access-in-community/m-p/169804#M30778</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-31T15:44:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

