<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: No of PBR limitations in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/168722#M30516</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Its R80.40 T180&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 11:07:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Licensing_User</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-01-23T11:07:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>No of PBR limitations</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/53768#M30495</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are facing the issue with No.of PBRs,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scenario... We have Juniper Switch with Virtual routers... we have installed Checkpoint IPS between Juniper Firewall and Juniper Switch... and we are routing the traffic through Checkpoint using PBR.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Support person not recommending more PBR(No.of PBR are 15)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it really limitation from Checkpoint 80.10? any suggestions please...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bala&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2019 17:11:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/53768#M30495</guid>
      <dc:creator>Balakrishna_Med</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-18T17:11:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No of PBR limitations</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/53773#M30496</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is no limit of PBR rules. Check Point officially declares in&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk100500&amp;amp;partition=General&amp;amp;product=Security#Limitations" target="_self"&gt;sk100500&lt;/A&gt; that "&lt;STRONG&gt;You can define &lt;U&gt;many&lt;/U&gt; Policy Rules.&lt;/STRONG&gt;"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Check&amp;nbsp;Point does not note how many, but &lt;EM&gt;many&lt;/EM&gt; for me means that only 15 PBR rules should be no issue at all.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2019 20:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/53773#M30496</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-18T20:42:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No of PBR limitations</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/168351#M30497</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Danny,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a similar situation with one of our clients, the only issue is "many" in our case means we need 2500 PBR.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check Point advised that "many" means 1024 only, so we have to go for a Linux PBR solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These routes will only stay for 3-6 months and will go to a single DG once the local network migration is complete.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is; will all limitations still apply if we implement PBR via Linux commands and 2500 individual rules?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;do you foresee any challenges in doing this or any work around that can be helpful, Please?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 12:59:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/168351#M30497</guid>
      <dc:creator>Licensing_User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-19T12:59:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No of PBR limitations</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/168558#M30498</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anyone please reply to the above question if they know about this, please?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 15:33:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/168558#M30498</guid>
      <dc:creator>Licensing_User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-20T15:33:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No of PBR limitations</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/168595#M30499</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you're trying to modify PBR with Linux commands (via expert mode) on the gateway, that is most definitely not supported.&lt;BR /&gt;If you're implementing the PBR on an external device, that's up to the external device.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What version/JHF are we talking about here?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 19:58:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/168595#M30499</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-20T19:58:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No of PBR limitations</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/168712#M30512</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we had a TAC case opened with ref:6-0003441780, and it was advised that the Linux commands could be used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It was our SD who was involved with CP TAC, but I will confirm the current version asap.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 10:15:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/168712#M30512</guid>
      <dc:creator>Licensing_User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-23T10:15:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No of PBR limitations</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/168722#M30516</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Its R80.40 T180&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 11:07:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/168722#M30516</guid>
      <dc:creator>Licensing_User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-23T11:07:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No of PBR limitations</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/168773#M30524</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It depends on where the PBR limit is coming from (the Linux kernel or the Gaia configuration DB).&lt;BR /&gt;That might be a question for TAC, though I am also asking out of band.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:34:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/168773#M30524</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-23T16:34:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No of PBR limitations</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/168807#M30529</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Gaia ultimately pushes these rules to kernel so same limitations should apply either way. Please open a RFE request if you need 2500 PBR rules to be supported in Gaia.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 19:46:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/168807#M30529</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sundeep_Mudgal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-23T19:46:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No of PBR limitations</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/168996#M30561</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok, Thanks for that. I did open a new TAC case, but no response yet. please let me know if you find out anything.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 23:20:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/168996#M30561</guid>
      <dc:creator>Licensing_User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-24T23:20:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No of PBR limitations</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/168999#M30564</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;TAC will ultimately tell you the same thing that&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/24175"&gt;@Sundeep_Mudgal&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;answered as his team in R&amp;amp;D is responsible for PBR functionality in Gaia.&lt;BR /&gt;Recommend raising this requirement with your local Check Point office.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 01:02:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/168999#M30564</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-25T01:02:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No of PBR limitations</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/169056#M30578</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the info&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/24175"&gt;@Sundeep_Mudgal&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 09:06:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/169056#M30578</guid>
      <dc:creator>Licensing_User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-25T09:06:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No of PBR limitations</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/169057#M30579</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/24175"&gt;@Sundeep_Mudgal&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;, it seems the RFE is a general feature request and might not be implemented. can a custom hotfix be provided if we contact local CP or a request via TAC?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 09:23:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/169057#M30579</guid>
      <dc:creator>Licensing_User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-25T09:23:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No of PBR limitations</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/169172#M30615</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;While it wouldn't hurt to file an&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://rfe.checkpoint.com" target="_self"&gt;RFE&lt;/A&gt;, this request should be handled through your local Check Point office.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2023 03:06:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/No-of-PBR-limitations/m-p/169172#M30615</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-26T03:06:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

