<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: TCP Reassembly in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/TCP-Reassembly/m-p/163135#M29097</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I see. In this case, it is best to reach out to your local Check Point representative an ask for assistance.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 08:17:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-11-25T08:17:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>TCP Reassembly</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/TCP-Reassembly/m-p/162755#M28957</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Checkmates,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do we have a documentation that states Check Point supports "fragmented packet Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) reassembly" or any equivalent or how Check Point handles "fragmented packet Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) reassembly".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please provide reference document, links&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 11:44:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/TCP-Reassembly/m-p/162755#M28957</guid>
      <dc:creator>Saul_Goodman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-22T11:44:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TCP Reassembly</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/TCP-Reassembly/m-p/162757#M28959</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Virtual defragmentation is an essential part of Stateful Inspection. It is so basic that I do not think it is explicitly described in any document other than CCSA courseware.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What are you looking for, exactly?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:10:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/TCP-Reassembly/m-p/162757#M28959</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-22T12:10:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TCP Reassembly</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/TCP-Reassembly/m-p/162764#M28961</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;any documentation/sk/admin guide/research publications of Check Point regarding how it handles "&lt;SPAN&gt;fragmented packet Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) reassembly" attack.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i need it to answer an RFP&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:41:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/TCP-Reassembly/m-p/162764#M28961</guid>
      <dc:creator>Saul_Goodman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-22T12:41:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TCP Reassembly</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/TCP-Reassembly/m-p/162778#M28968</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Look for "virtual defragmentation", there are plenty of SKs. It is not really productive to use PAN terminology when looking for Check Point answers &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 13:37:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/TCP-Reassembly/m-p/162778#M28968</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-22T13:37:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TCP Reassembly</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/TCP-Reassembly/m-p/163099#M29088</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Actually, I'm competing with PAN with this deal so that's why I'm looking for a counterpart on our end. But thanks for the reply Val&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2022 18:24:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/TCP-Reassembly/m-p/163099#M29088</guid>
      <dc:creator>Saul_Goodman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-24T18:24:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TCP Reassembly</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/TCP-Reassembly/m-p/163135#M29097</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I see. In this case, it is best to reach out to your local Check Point representative an ask for assistance.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 08:17:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/TCP-Reassembly/m-p/163135#M29097</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-25T08:17:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

