<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Multi-ISP + NAT not working after migration from R77.30 to R80.10 in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Multi-ISP-NAT-not-working-after-migration-from-R77-30-to-R80-10/m-p/35175#M2865</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, I have an opened case but in parallel wanted to get more options while&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the support team finds what's going on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 08:12:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Antonio_M</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-01T08:12:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multi-ISP + NAT not working after migration from R77.30 to R80.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Multi-ISP-NAT-not-working-after-migration-from-R77-30-to-R80-10/m-p/35169#M2859</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;Hello community,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;After replacing the current 4200 gateways running 77.30 by a new ones 5200 running R88.10, the multi-isp set up no longer works. The gateways, running a Cluster XL cluster are connected to two different ISPs and perform NAT depending on the target ISP. We copied all the GAIA configurations from the old gateways to the new ones and the cpisp_update script. No IP or route changes, pure gateway replacement without config changes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;To support this NAT, we added the following dynamic objects:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="" style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;dynamic_objects -n DYN_ISP_Vodafone&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="" style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;dynamic_objects -n DYN_ISP_Colt&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="" style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;dynamic_objects -o DYN_ISP_Vodafone -r 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 -a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="" style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;dynamic_objects -o DYN_ISP_Colt -r 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 -a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;We confirmed the objects exist running the command dyn_objects -l&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;These dynamic objects are used in two different NAT rules for hiding the traffic as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;NAT Rule Vodafone:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="" style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;Original Source: “Internal Networks”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="" style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;Original Destination: “DYN_ISP_Vodafone”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="" style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;Traslated Source: “Vodafone-Public-IP”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="" style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;Traslated Destination: “Original”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;NAT Rule Colt:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="" style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;Original Source: “Internal Networks”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="" style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;Original Destination: “DYN_ISP_Colt”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="" style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;Traslated Source: “Vodafone-Colt-IP”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="" style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;Traslated Destination: “Original”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="" style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;To dynamically adjust the NAT according to the active ISP, we modified the cpisp_update script by adding the following commands at the end of the file:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;# Verify which link is up with this command: tail -f /tmp/cpisp_state&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;echo "--------------------------" &amp;gt;&amp;gt; /tmp/cpisp_state&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;echo `/bin/date +%d-%b-%Y_%Hh-%Mm-%Ss` &amp;gt;&amp;gt; /tmp/cpisp_state&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;echo "RESTARTING SCRIPT" &amp;gt;&amp;gt; /tmp/cpisp_state&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;echo "LINK1" &amp;gt;&amp;gt; /tmp/cpisp_state&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;echo $LINK1_STATE &amp;gt;&amp;gt; /tmp/cpisp_state&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;echo "LINK2" &amp;gt;&amp;gt; /tmp/cpisp_state&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;echo $LINK2_STATE &amp;gt;&amp;gt; /tmp/cpisp_state&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;echo "--------------------------" &amp;gt;&amp;gt; /tmp/cpisp_state&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;echo " " &amp;gt;&amp;gt; /tmp/cpisp_state&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;# Check if the Link is up or down&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;if ($LINK2_STATE == "down") then&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;fw tab -t dynobj_cache -x -y&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;dynamic_objects -o DYN_ISP_Vodafone -r 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 -a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;dynamic_objects -o DYN_ISP_Colt -r 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 -d&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;dynamic_objects -o DYN_ISP_Colt -r 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 -a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;endif&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;if ($LINK1_STATE == "down") then&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;fw tab -t dynobj_cache -x -y&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;dynamic_objects -o DYN_ISP_Colt -r 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 -a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;dynamic_objects -o DYN_ISP_Vodafone -r 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 -d&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;dynamic_objects -o DYN_ISP_Vodafone -r 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 -a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;endif&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;# if both Links are up, return to Load Sharing&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;if (($LINK1_STATE == "up") &amp;amp;&amp;amp; ($LINK2_STATE == "up")) then&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;fw tab -t dynobj_cache -x -y&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;dynamic_objects -o DYN_ISP_Colt -r 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 -a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;dynamic_objects -o DYN_ISP_Vodafone -r 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 -a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;endif&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;We can confirm it is a NAT issue because if we replace the above NAT rules by other using “any” instead of the dynamic object as the “Original Destination” it works, but not for the secondary ISP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;Current setup: 2 x 4200 gateways running R77.30 -&amp;gt; Multi-ISP Working&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;New setup: 2 x 5200 gateways running R80.10 Jumbo hotfix take169 -&amp;gt; Multi-ISP not working.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;Regards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2019 09:31:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Multi-ISP-NAT-not-working-after-migration-from-R77-30-to-R80-10/m-p/35169#M2859</guid>
      <dc:creator>Antonio_M</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-23T09:31:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multi-ISP + NAT not working after migration from R77.30 to R80.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Multi-ISP-NAT-not-working-after-migration-from-R77-30-to-R80-10/m-p/35170#M2860</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What does the &lt;STRONG&gt;dynamic_objects -l&lt;/STRONG&gt; command say on both sets of gateways?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:31:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Multi-ISP-NAT-not-working-after-migration-from-R77-30-to-R80-10/m-p/35170#M2860</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-23T11:31:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multi-ISP + NAT not working after migration from R77.30 to R80.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Multi-ISP-NAT-not-working-after-migration-from-R77-30-to-R80-10/m-p/35171#M2861</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;They showed 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0. It looks like the script is not correctly&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;updating the objects. I triggered the script manually by disabling one of&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the ISP. That script is working in the current gateways. Any changes on&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R80.10?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On Sat, 23 Feb 2019, 12:31 Dameon Welch-Abernathy, &amp;lt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:35:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Multi-ISP-NAT-not-working-after-migration-from-R77-30-to-R80-10/m-p/35171#M2861</guid>
      <dc:creator>Antonio_M</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-23T11:35:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multi-ISP + NAT not working after migration from R77.30 to R80.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Multi-ISP-NAT-not-working-after-migration-from-R77-30-to-R80-10/m-p/35172#M2862</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not aware of any changes here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It might be worth a TAC case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/message/39214"&gt;How To Open a Case with TAC and/or Account Services&lt;/A&gt;‌&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:42:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Multi-ISP-NAT-not-working-after-migration-from-R77-30-to-R80-10/m-p/35172#M2862</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-23T11:42:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multi-ISP + NAT not working after migration from R77.30 to R80.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Multi-ISP-NAT-not-working-after-migration-from-R77-30-to-R80-10/m-p/35173#M2863</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We managed to get the dynamic_objects working and now outgoing traffic is working, however incoming traffic for static NATs using the secondary ISP no longer works. This was working prior to the upgrade.&amp;nbsp; Any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;dynamic_objects -l&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;looks like this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="" style="color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 12pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11pt;"&gt;object name : DYN_ISP_Vodafone&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="" style="color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 12pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11pt;"&gt;range 0 : 0.0.0.0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 255.255.255.255&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="" style="color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 12pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11pt;"&gt;object name : DYN_ISP_Colt&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="" style="color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 12pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11pt;"&gt;range 0 : 0.0.0.0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 255.255.255.255&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="" style="color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 12pt;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="" style="color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 12pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11pt;"&gt;Regards.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 07:45:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Multi-ISP-NAT-not-working-after-migration-from-R77-30-to-R80-10/m-p/35173#M2863</guid>
      <dc:creator>Antonio_M</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-28T07:45:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multi-ISP + NAT not working after migration from R77.30 to R80.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Multi-ISP-NAT-not-working-after-migration-from-R77-30-to-R80-10/m-p/35174#M2864</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you open a TAC case as I previously suggested?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 22:08:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Multi-ISP-NAT-not-working-after-migration-from-R77-30-to-R80-10/m-p/35174#M2864</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-28T22:08:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multi-ISP + NAT not working after migration from R77.30 to R80.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Multi-ISP-NAT-not-working-after-migration-from-R77-30-to-R80-10/m-p/35175#M2865</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, I have an opened case but in parallel wanted to get more options while&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the support team finds what's going on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 08:12:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Multi-ISP-NAT-not-working-after-migration-from-R77-30-to-R80-10/m-p/35175#M2865</guid>
      <dc:creator>Antonio_M</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-01T08:12:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

