<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Interoperable object question in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Interoperable-object-question/m-p/160699#M28526</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Ah, the word should, the most famous IT word, hehe. Thanks mate, we will find out next week : - )&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 17:53:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-10-28T17:53:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Interoperable object question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Interoperable-object-question/m-p/160672#M28521</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey guys,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Just wondering, anyone ever set up VPN S2S with interoperable object with dynamic IP option? If so, anything else needed to make that work?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Just wondering...if its dynamic IP, you still set up VPN domain on it as normal or anything else to be done?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Tx!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 13:46:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Interoperable-object-question/m-p/160672#M28521</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-28T13:46:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interoperable object question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Interoperable-object-question/m-p/160674#M28522</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Below are options when you select dynamic IP on interoperable object, so I assume one selected is correct one?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot_1.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/18258iD8A8191AB6EF7351/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Screenshot_1.png" alt="Screenshot_1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 13:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Interoperable-object-question/m-p/160674#M28522</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-28T13:50:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interoperable object question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Interoperable-object-question/m-p/160695#M28523</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Everything else should be the same except you cannot authenticate that peer with a pre-shared key (i.e. you must use certificates).&lt;BR /&gt;This is because PSK with DAIP is not considered secure and we do not allow the configuration.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 17:45:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Interoperable-object-question/m-p/160695#M28523</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-28T17:45:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interoperable object question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Interoperable-object-question/m-p/160697#M28524</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks phoneboy. Yes, I knew that was the case, but wondering if below would work?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot_1.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/18259i4FB02283DAFA6E2A/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Screenshot_1.png" alt="Screenshot_1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 17:50:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Interoperable-object-question/m-p/160697#M28524</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-28T17:50:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interoperable object question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Interoperable-object-question/m-p/160698#M28525</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As far as I know, it should work.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 17:52:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Interoperable-object-question/m-p/160698#M28525</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-28T17:52:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interoperable object question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Interoperable-object-question/m-p/160699#M28526</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ah, the word should, the most famous IT word, hehe. Thanks mate, we will find out next week : - )&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 17:53:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Interoperable-object-question/m-p/160699#M28526</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-28T17:53:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

